Cargando…

Structure delineation in the presence of metal – A comparative phantom study using single and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artefact reduction

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Metal artefacts in computed tomography (CT) images impairs structure delineation. These artefacts can potentially be reduced with dual-energy CT (DECT) with or without using metal artefact reduction (MAR). The purpose was to investigate how structure delineation in DECT with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pettersson, Erik, Bäck, Anna, Björk-Eriksson, Thomas, Lindencrona, Ulrika, Petruson, Karin, Thilander-Klang, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2019.01.001
_version_ 1783636765732503552
author Pettersson, Erik
Bäck, Anna
Björk-Eriksson, Thomas
Lindencrona, Ulrika
Petruson, Karin
Thilander-Klang, Anne
author_facet Pettersson, Erik
Bäck, Anna
Björk-Eriksson, Thomas
Lindencrona, Ulrika
Petruson, Karin
Thilander-Klang, Anne
author_sort Pettersson, Erik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Metal artefacts in computed tomography (CT) images impairs structure delineation. These artefacts can potentially be reduced with dual-energy CT (DECT) with or without using metal artefact reduction (MAR). The purpose was to investigate how structure delineation in DECT with or without MAR and single-energy CT (SECT) images were affected by metals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom with known irregular structures was developed. Reference structures were determined from a low-noise scan without metal. Bilateral hip prostheses were simulated with steel or titanium inserts. The phantom was scanned with SECT and fast-kV switching DECT with optional MAR. Four radiation oncologists delineated the structures in two phantom set-ups. Delineated structures were evaluated with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance relative to the reference structures. RESULTS: With titanium inserts, more structures were detected for non-MAR DECT compared to SECT while the same or less were detected with steel inserts. MAR improved delineation in DECT images. For steel inserts, three structures in the region of artefacts, were delineated by at least two oncologists with MAR-DECT compared to none with non-MAR DECT or SECT. The highest values of DSC for MAR-DECT were 0.69, 0.81 and 0.77 for those structures. CONCLUSIONS: Delineation was improved with non-MAR DECT compared to SECT, especially for titanium inserts. A larger improvement was seen with the use of MAR for both steel and titanium inserts. The improvement was dependent on the location of the structure relative to the inserts, and the structure contrast relative to the background.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78075542021-01-14 Structure delineation in the presence of metal – A comparative phantom study using single and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artefact reduction Pettersson, Erik Bäck, Anna Björk-Eriksson, Thomas Lindencrona, Ulrika Petruson, Karin Thilander-Klang, Anne Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Metal artefacts in computed tomography (CT) images impairs structure delineation. These artefacts can potentially be reduced with dual-energy CT (DECT) with or without using metal artefact reduction (MAR). The purpose was to investigate how structure delineation in DECT with or without MAR and single-energy CT (SECT) images were affected by metals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom with known irregular structures was developed. Reference structures were determined from a low-noise scan without metal. Bilateral hip prostheses were simulated with steel or titanium inserts. The phantom was scanned with SECT and fast-kV switching DECT with optional MAR. Four radiation oncologists delineated the structures in two phantom set-ups. Delineated structures were evaluated with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance relative to the reference structures. RESULTS: With titanium inserts, more structures were detected for non-MAR DECT compared to SECT while the same or less were detected with steel inserts. MAR improved delineation in DECT images. For steel inserts, three structures in the region of artefacts, were delineated by at least two oncologists with MAR-DECT compared to none with non-MAR DECT or SECT. The highest values of DSC for MAR-DECT were 0.69, 0.81 and 0.77 for those structures. CONCLUSIONS: Delineation was improved with non-MAR DECT compared to SECT, especially for titanium inserts. A larger improvement was seen with the use of MAR for both steel and titanium inserts. The improvement was dependent on the location of the structure relative to the inserts, and the structure contrast relative to the background. Elsevier 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7807554/ /pubmed/33458424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2019.01.001 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Pettersson, Erik
Bäck, Anna
Björk-Eriksson, Thomas
Lindencrona, Ulrika
Petruson, Karin
Thilander-Klang, Anne
Structure delineation in the presence of metal – A comparative phantom study using single and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artefact reduction
title Structure delineation in the presence of metal – A comparative phantom study using single and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artefact reduction
title_full Structure delineation in the presence of metal – A comparative phantom study using single and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artefact reduction
title_fullStr Structure delineation in the presence of metal – A comparative phantom study using single and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artefact reduction
title_full_unstemmed Structure delineation in the presence of metal – A comparative phantom study using single and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artefact reduction
title_short Structure delineation in the presence of metal – A comparative phantom study using single and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artefact reduction
title_sort structure delineation in the presence of metal – a comparative phantom study using single and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artefact reduction
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2019.01.001
work_keys_str_mv AT petterssonerik structuredelineationinthepresenceofmetalacomparativephantomstudyusingsingleanddualenergycomputedtomographywithandwithoutmetalartefactreduction
AT backanna structuredelineationinthepresenceofmetalacomparativephantomstudyusingsingleanddualenergycomputedtomographywithandwithoutmetalartefactreduction
AT bjorkerikssonthomas structuredelineationinthepresenceofmetalacomparativephantomstudyusingsingleanddualenergycomputedtomographywithandwithoutmetalartefactreduction
AT lindencronaulrika structuredelineationinthepresenceofmetalacomparativephantomstudyusingsingleanddualenergycomputedtomographywithandwithoutmetalartefactreduction
AT petrusonkarin structuredelineationinthepresenceofmetalacomparativephantomstudyusingsingleanddualenergycomputedtomographywithandwithoutmetalartefactreduction
AT thilanderklanganne structuredelineationinthepresenceofmetalacomparativephantomstudyusingsingleanddualenergycomputedtomographywithandwithoutmetalartefactreduction