Cargando…

Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy centers frequently lack simple tools for periodic treatment plan verification and feedback on current plan quality. It is difficult to measure treatment quality over different years or during the planning process. Here, we implemented plan quality assurance (QA)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaniqui, Ana, Canters, Richard, Vaassen, Femke, Hazelaar, Colien, Lubken, Indra, Kremer, Kirsten, Wolfs, Cecile, van Elmpt, Wouter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.10.006
_version_ 1783636768006864896
author Vaniqui, Ana
Canters, Richard
Vaassen, Femke
Hazelaar, Colien
Lubken, Indra
Kremer, Kirsten
Wolfs, Cecile
van Elmpt, Wouter
author_facet Vaniqui, Ana
Canters, Richard
Vaassen, Femke
Hazelaar, Colien
Lubken, Indra
Kremer, Kirsten
Wolfs, Cecile
van Elmpt, Wouter
author_sort Vaniqui, Ana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy centers frequently lack simple tools for periodic treatment plan verification and feedback on current plan quality. It is difficult to measure treatment quality over different years or during the planning process. Here, we implemented plan quality assurance (QA) by developing a database of dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics and a prediction model. These tools were used to assess automatically optimized treatment plans for rectal cancer patients, based on cohort analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A treatment plan QA framework was established and an overlap volume histogram based model was used to predict DVH parameters for cohorts of patients treated in 2018 and 2019 and grouped according to planning technique. A training cohort of 22 re-optimized treatment plans was used to make the prediction model. The prediction model was validated on 95 automatically generated treatment plans (automatically optimized cohort) and 93 manually optimized plans (manually optimized cohort). RESULTS: For the manually optimized cohort, on average the prediction deviated less than 0.3 ± 1.4 Gy and −4.3 ± 5.5 Gy, for the mean doses to the bowel bag and bladder, respectively; for the automatically optimized cohort a smaller deviation was observed: −0.1 ± 1.1 Gy and −0.2 ± 2.5 Gy, respectively. The interquartile range of DVH parameters was on average smaller for the automatically optimized cohort, indicating less variation within each parameter compared to manual planning. CONCLUSION: An automated framework to monitor treatment quality with a DVH prediction model was successfully implemented clinically and revealed less variation in DVH parameters for automated in comparison to manually optimized plans. The framework also allowed for individual feedback and DVH estimation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78075652021-01-14 Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics Vaniqui, Ana Canters, Richard Vaassen, Femke Hazelaar, Colien Lubken, Indra Kremer, Kirsten Wolfs, Cecile van Elmpt, Wouter Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy centers frequently lack simple tools for periodic treatment plan verification and feedback on current plan quality. It is difficult to measure treatment quality over different years or during the planning process. Here, we implemented plan quality assurance (QA) by developing a database of dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics and a prediction model. These tools were used to assess automatically optimized treatment plans for rectal cancer patients, based on cohort analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A treatment plan QA framework was established and an overlap volume histogram based model was used to predict DVH parameters for cohorts of patients treated in 2018 and 2019 and grouped according to planning technique. A training cohort of 22 re-optimized treatment plans was used to make the prediction model. The prediction model was validated on 95 automatically generated treatment plans (automatically optimized cohort) and 93 manually optimized plans (manually optimized cohort). RESULTS: For the manually optimized cohort, on average the prediction deviated less than 0.3 ± 1.4 Gy and −4.3 ± 5.5 Gy, for the mean doses to the bowel bag and bladder, respectively; for the automatically optimized cohort a smaller deviation was observed: −0.1 ± 1.1 Gy and −0.2 ± 2.5 Gy, respectively. The interquartile range of DVH parameters was on average smaller for the automatically optimized cohort, indicating less variation within each parameter compared to manual planning. CONCLUSION: An automated framework to monitor treatment quality with a DVH prediction model was successfully implemented clinically and revealed less variation in DVH parameters for automated in comparison to manually optimized plans. The framework also allowed for individual feedback and DVH estimation. Elsevier 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7807565/ /pubmed/33458347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.10.006 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Vaniqui, Ana
Canters, Richard
Vaassen, Femke
Hazelaar, Colien
Lubken, Indra
Kremer, Kirsten
Wolfs, Cecile
van Elmpt, Wouter
Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics
title Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics
title_full Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics
title_fullStr Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics
title_full_unstemmed Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics
title_short Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics
title_sort treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.10.006
work_keys_str_mv AT vaniquiana treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics
AT cantersrichard treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics
AT vaassenfemke treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics
AT hazelaarcolien treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics
AT lubkenindra treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics
AT kremerkirsten treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics
AT wolfscecile treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics
AT vanelmptwouter treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics