Cargando…
Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy centers frequently lack simple tools for periodic treatment plan verification and feedback on current plan quality. It is difficult to measure treatment quality over different years or during the planning process. Here, we implemented plan quality assurance (QA)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.10.006 |
_version_ | 1783636768006864896 |
---|---|
author | Vaniqui, Ana Canters, Richard Vaassen, Femke Hazelaar, Colien Lubken, Indra Kremer, Kirsten Wolfs, Cecile van Elmpt, Wouter |
author_facet | Vaniqui, Ana Canters, Richard Vaassen, Femke Hazelaar, Colien Lubken, Indra Kremer, Kirsten Wolfs, Cecile van Elmpt, Wouter |
author_sort | Vaniqui, Ana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy centers frequently lack simple tools for periodic treatment plan verification and feedback on current plan quality. It is difficult to measure treatment quality over different years or during the planning process. Here, we implemented plan quality assurance (QA) by developing a database of dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics and a prediction model. These tools were used to assess automatically optimized treatment plans for rectal cancer patients, based on cohort analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A treatment plan QA framework was established and an overlap volume histogram based model was used to predict DVH parameters for cohorts of patients treated in 2018 and 2019 and grouped according to planning technique. A training cohort of 22 re-optimized treatment plans was used to make the prediction model. The prediction model was validated on 95 automatically generated treatment plans (automatically optimized cohort) and 93 manually optimized plans (manually optimized cohort). RESULTS: For the manually optimized cohort, on average the prediction deviated less than 0.3 ± 1.4 Gy and −4.3 ± 5.5 Gy, for the mean doses to the bowel bag and bladder, respectively; for the automatically optimized cohort a smaller deviation was observed: −0.1 ± 1.1 Gy and −0.2 ± 2.5 Gy, respectively. The interquartile range of DVH parameters was on average smaller for the automatically optimized cohort, indicating less variation within each parameter compared to manual planning. CONCLUSION: An automated framework to monitor treatment quality with a DVH prediction model was successfully implemented clinically and revealed less variation in DVH parameters for automated in comparison to manually optimized plans. The framework also allowed for individual feedback and DVH estimation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7807565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78075652021-01-14 Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics Vaniqui, Ana Canters, Richard Vaassen, Femke Hazelaar, Colien Lubken, Indra Kremer, Kirsten Wolfs, Cecile van Elmpt, Wouter Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy centers frequently lack simple tools for periodic treatment plan verification and feedback on current plan quality. It is difficult to measure treatment quality over different years or during the planning process. Here, we implemented plan quality assurance (QA) by developing a database of dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics and a prediction model. These tools were used to assess automatically optimized treatment plans for rectal cancer patients, based on cohort analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A treatment plan QA framework was established and an overlap volume histogram based model was used to predict DVH parameters for cohorts of patients treated in 2018 and 2019 and grouped according to planning technique. A training cohort of 22 re-optimized treatment plans was used to make the prediction model. The prediction model was validated on 95 automatically generated treatment plans (automatically optimized cohort) and 93 manually optimized plans (manually optimized cohort). RESULTS: For the manually optimized cohort, on average the prediction deviated less than 0.3 ± 1.4 Gy and −4.3 ± 5.5 Gy, for the mean doses to the bowel bag and bladder, respectively; for the automatically optimized cohort a smaller deviation was observed: −0.1 ± 1.1 Gy and −0.2 ± 2.5 Gy, respectively. The interquartile range of DVH parameters was on average smaller for the automatically optimized cohort, indicating less variation within each parameter compared to manual planning. CONCLUSION: An automated framework to monitor treatment quality with a DVH prediction model was successfully implemented clinically and revealed less variation in DVH parameters for automated in comparison to manually optimized plans. The framework also allowed for individual feedback and DVH estimation. Elsevier 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7807565/ /pubmed/33458347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.10.006 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Vaniqui, Ana Canters, Richard Vaassen, Femke Hazelaar, Colien Lubken, Indra Kremer, Kirsten Wolfs, Cecile van Elmpt, Wouter Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics |
title | Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics |
title_full | Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics |
title_fullStr | Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics |
title_short | Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics |
title_sort | treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.10.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaniquiana treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics AT cantersrichard treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics AT vaassenfemke treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics AT hazelaarcolien treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics AT lubkenindra treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics AT kremerkirsten treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics AT wolfscecile treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics AT vanelmptwouter treatmentplanqualityassessmentforradiotherapyofrectalcancerpatientsusingpredictionoforganatriskdosemetrics |