The accuracy of Magnetic Resonance – Cone Beam Computed Tomography soft-tissue matching for prostate radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic Resonance (MR)-Only radiotherapy requires a method for matching image with on-treatment Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of MR-CBCT soft-tissue matching for prostate MR-only radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three patient cohorts were used, with all patients receiving MR and CT scans. For the first cohort (10 patients) the first fraction CBCT was automatically rigidly registered to the CT and MR scans and the MR-CT registration predicted using the MR-CBCT and CT-CBCT registrations. This was compared to the automatic MR-CT registration. For the second and third cohorts (five patients each) the first fraction CBCT was independently matched to the CT and MR by four radiographers, the MR-CBCT and CT-CBCT matches compared and the inter-observer variability assessed. The second cohort used a CT-based structure set and the third a MR-based structure set with the MR relabelled as a ‘CT’. RESULTS: The mean difference between predicted and actual MR-CT registrations was [Formula: see text] (s.e.m.). Radiographer MR-CBCT registrations were not significantly different to CT-CBCT, with mean differences in soft-tissue match [Formula: see text] and all except one difference [Formula: see text]. This was less than the MR-CBCT inter-observer limits of agreement [Formula: see text] (vertical, longitudinal, lateral), which were similar ([Formula: see text]) to CT-CBCT. CONCLUSIONS: MR-CBCT soft-tissue matching is not significantly different to CT-CBCT. Relabelling the MR as a ‘CT’ does not appear to change the automatic registration. This suggests that MR-CBCT soft-tissue matching is feasible and accurate.