Cargando…

Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion weighted (DW) MRI may facilitate target volume delineation for head-and-neck (HN) radiation treatment planning. In this study we assessed the use of a dedicated, geometrically accurate, DW-MRI sequence for target volume delineation. The delineations were compared wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schakel, Tim, Peltenburg, Boris, Dankbaar, Jan-Willem, Cardenas, Carlos E., Aristophanous, Michalis, Terhaard, Chris H.J., Hoogduin, Johannes M., Philippens, Marielle E.P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2017.12.004
_version_ 1783636782509719552
author Schakel, Tim
Peltenburg, Boris
Dankbaar, Jan-Willem
Cardenas, Carlos E.
Aristophanous, Michalis
Terhaard, Chris H.J.
Hoogduin, Johannes M.
Philippens, Marielle E.P.
author_facet Schakel, Tim
Peltenburg, Boris
Dankbaar, Jan-Willem
Cardenas, Carlos E.
Aristophanous, Michalis
Terhaard, Chris H.J.
Hoogduin, Johannes M.
Philippens, Marielle E.P.
author_sort Schakel, Tim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion weighted (DW) MRI may facilitate target volume delineation for head-and-neck (HN) radiation treatment planning. In this study we assessed the use of a dedicated, geometrically accurate, DW-MRI sequence for target volume delineation. The delineations were compared with semi-automatic segmentations on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) images and evaluated for interobserver variation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen HN cancer patients underwent both DW-MRI and FDG-PET for RT treatment planning. Target delineation on DW-MRI was performed by three observers, while for PET a semi-automatic segmentation was performed using a Gaussian mixture model. For interobserver variation and intermodality variation, volumes, overlap metrics and Hausdorff distances were calculated from the delineations. RESULTS: The median volumes delineated by the three observers on DW-MRI were 10.8, 10.5 and 9.0 cm(3) respectively, and was larger than the median PET volume (8.0 cm(3)). The median conformity index of DW-MRI for interobserver variation was 0.73 (range 0.38–0.80). Compared to PET, the delineations on DW-MRI by the three observers showed a median dice similarity coefficient of 0.71, 0.69 and 0.72 respectively. The mean Hausdorff distance was small with median (range) distances between PET and DW-MRI of 2.3 (1.5–6.8), 2.5 (1.6–6.9) and 2.0 (1.35–7.6) mm respectively. Over all patients, the median 95th percentile distances were 6.0 (3.0–13.4), 6.6 (4.0–24.0) and 5.3 (3.4–26.0) mm. CONCLUSION: Using a dedicated DW-MRI sequence, target volumes could be defined with good interobserver agreement and a good overlap with PET. Target volume delineation using DW-MRI is promising in head-and-neck radiotherapy, combined with other modalities, it can lead to more precise target volume delineation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78076282021-01-14 Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography Schakel, Tim Peltenburg, Boris Dankbaar, Jan-Willem Cardenas, Carlos E. Aristophanous, Michalis Terhaard, Chris H.J. Hoogduin, Johannes M. Philippens, Marielle E.P. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion weighted (DW) MRI may facilitate target volume delineation for head-and-neck (HN) radiation treatment planning. In this study we assessed the use of a dedicated, geometrically accurate, DW-MRI sequence for target volume delineation. The delineations were compared with semi-automatic segmentations on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) images and evaluated for interobserver variation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen HN cancer patients underwent both DW-MRI and FDG-PET for RT treatment planning. Target delineation on DW-MRI was performed by three observers, while for PET a semi-automatic segmentation was performed using a Gaussian mixture model. For interobserver variation and intermodality variation, volumes, overlap metrics and Hausdorff distances were calculated from the delineations. RESULTS: The median volumes delineated by the three observers on DW-MRI were 10.8, 10.5 and 9.0 cm(3) respectively, and was larger than the median PET volume (8.0 cm(3)). The median conformity index of DW-MRI for interobserver variation was 0.73 (range 0.38–0.80). Compared to PET, the delineations on DW-MRI by the three observers showed a median dice similarity coefficient of 0.71, 0.69 and 0.72 respectively. The mean Hausdorff distance was small with median (range) distances between PET and DW-MRI of 2.3 (1.5–6.8), 2.5 (1.6–6.9) and 2.0 (1.35–7.6) mm respectively. Over all patients, the median 95th percentile distances were 6.0 (3.0–13.4), 6.6 (4.0–24.0) and 5.3 (3.4–26.0) mm. CONCLUSION: Using a dedicated DW-MRI sequence, target volumes could be defined with good interobserver agreement and a good overlap with PET. Target volume delineation using DW-MRI is promising in head-and-neck radiotherapy, combined with other modalities, it can lead to more precise target volume delineation. Elsevier 2018-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7807628/ /pubmed/33458363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2017.12.004 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Schakel, Tim
Peltenburg, Boris
Dankbaar, Jan-Willem
Cardenas, Carlos E.
Aristophanous, Michalis
Terhaard, Chris H.J.
Hoogduin, Johannes M.
Philippens, Marielle E.P.
Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
title Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
title_full Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
title_fullStr Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
title_short Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
title_sort evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented (18)f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2017.12.004
work_keys_str_mv AT schakeltim evaluationofdiffusionweightedimagingfortumordelineationinheadandneckradiotherapybycomparisonwithautomaticallysegmented18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomography
AT peltenburgboris evaluationofdiffusionweightedimagingfortumordelineationinheadandneckradiotherapybycomparisonwithautomaticallysegmented18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomography
AT dankbaarjanwillem evaluationofdiffusionweightedimagingfortumordelineationinheadandneckradiotherapybycomparisonwithautomaticallysegmented18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomography
AT cardenascarlose evaluationofdiffusionweightedimagingfortumordelineationinheadandneckradiotherapybycomparisonwithautomaticallysegmented18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomography
AT aristophanousmichalis evaluationofdiffusionweightedimagingfortumordelineationinheadandneckradiotherapybycomparisonwithautomaticallysegmented18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomography
AT terhaardchrishj evaluationofdiffusionweightedimagingfortumordelineationinheadandneckradiotherapybycomparisonwithautomaticallysegmented18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomography
AT hoogduinjohannesm evaluationofdiffusionweightedimagingfortumordelineationinheadandneckradiotherapybycomparisonwithautomaticallysegmented18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomography
AT philippensmarielleep evaluationofdiffusionweightedimagingfortumordelineationinheadandneckradiotherapybycomparisonwithautomaticallysegmented18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomography