Cargando…

Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The limited image quality in Cone Beam CT (CBCT) stemming primarily from scattered radiation hinders accurate CBCT based dose calculation in radiotherapy. We investigated the use of a stoichiometric calibration for dose calculation on CBCT images of lung cancer patients. MATE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaplan, Laura Patricia, Elstrøm, Ulrik Vindelev, Møller, Ditte Sloth, Hoffmann, Lone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2018.09.001
_version_ 1783636788989919232
author Kaplan, Laura Patricia
Elstrøm, Ulrik Vindelev
Møller, Ditte Sloth
Hoffmann, Lone
author_facet Kaplan, Laura Patricia
Elstrøm, Ulrik Vindelev
Møller, Ditte Sloth
Hoffmann, Lone
author_sort Kaplan, Laura Patricia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The limited image quality in Cone Beam CT (CBCT) stemming primarily from scattered radiation hinders accurate CBCT based dose calculation in radiotherapy. We investigated the use of a stoichiometric calibration for dose calculation on CBCT images of lung cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT calibrations were performed with thorax scan protocols, using a phantom with approximately the diameter of an average human thorax and a central cavity simulating the thoracic cavity. Thus scatter conditions resembling those in clinical thorax CBCT scans were simulated. A published stoichiometric parametrization was used. A treatment plan was simulated on CBCT and CT scans of an anthropomorphic phantom, the dose distributions were calculated, and clinically relevant DVH parameters were compared. Twelve lung cancer patients had surveillance CT scans (s-CT) taken twice during their treatment course in addition to daily setup CBCTs. Dose calculations were performed on the s-CTs and the corresponding CBCTs taken on the same day, and DVH parameters were compared. RESULTS: Eighty percent of CBCT DVH parameters found for the phantom were within ±1% of CT doses, and 98% were within ±3%. For patients, the median CT/CBCT dose difference was within ±2%, and 98% of DVH parameters were within ±4%. Minimum dose to the tumor was underestimated (median 1.9%) on CBCT, while maximum doses to most organs at risk were slightly overestimated. CONCLUSION: Direct dose calculations on CBCTs of lung cancer patients were feasible within ∼4% accuracy using a simple calibration method, which is easily implemented in a clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78076592021-01-14 Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region Kaplan, Laura Patricia Elstrøm, Ulrik Vindelev Møller, Ditte Sloth Hoffmann, Lone Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The limited image quality in Cone Beam CT (CBCT) stemming primarily from scattered radiation hinders accurate CBCT based dose calculation in radiotherapy. We investigated the use of a stoichiometric calibration for dose calculation on CBCT images of lung cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT calibrations were performed with thorax scan protocols, using a phantom with approximately the diameter of an average human thorax and a central cavity simulating the thoracic cavity. Thus scatter conditions resembling those in clinical thorax CBCT scans were simulated. A published stoichiometric parametrization was used. A treatment plan was simulated on CBCT and CT scans of an anthropomorphic phantom, the dose distributions were calculated, and clinically relevant DVH parameters were compared. Twelve lung cancer patients had surveillance CT scans (s-CT) taken twice during their treatment course in addition to daily setup CBCTs. Dose calculations were performed on the s-CTs and the corresponding CBCTs taken on the same day, and DVH parameters were compared. RESULTS: Eighty percent of CBCT DVH parameters found for the phantom were within ±1% of CT doses, and 98% were within ±3%. For patients, the median CT/CBCT dose difference was within ±2%, and 98% of DVH parameters were within ±4%. Minimum dose to the tumor was underestimated (median 1.9%) on CBCT, while maximum doses to most organs at risk were slightly overestimated. CONCLUSION: Direct dose calculations on CBCTs of lung cancer patients were feasible within ∼4% accuracy using a simple calibration method, which is easily implemented in a clinical setting. Elsevier 2018-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7807659/ /pubmed/33458404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2018.09.001 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society of Radiotherapy & Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Kaplan, Laura Patricia
Elstrøm, Ulrik Vindelev
Møller, Ditte Sloth
Hoffmann, Lone
Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region
title Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region
title_full Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region
title_fullStr Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region
title_full_unstemmed Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region
title_short Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region
title_sort cone beam ct based dose calculation in the thorax region
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2018.09.001
work_keys_str_mv AT kaplanlaurapatricia conebeamctbaseddosecalculationinthethoraxregion
AT elstrømulrikvindelev conebeamctbaseddosecalculationinthethoraxregion
AT møllerdittesloth conebeamctbaseddosecalculationinthethoraxregion
AT hoffmannlone conebeamctbaseddosecalculationinthethoraxregion