Cargando…
An on-site dosimetry audit for high-energy electron beams
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: External dosimetry audits are powerful quality assurance instruments for radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to implement an electron dosimetry audit based on a contemporary code of practice within the requirements for calibration laboratories performing proficiency tests...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2018.02.001 |
_version_ | 1783636789448146944 |
---|---|
author | de Prez, Leon Heukelom, Stan Jansen, Bartel Jansen, Wim van de Kamer, Jeroen van Klink, Wenze Kok, Elfried Perik, Thijs de Pooter, Jacco Wittkämper, Frits |
author_facet | de Prez, Leon Heukelom, Stan Jansen, Bartel Jansen, Wim van de Kamer, Jeroen van Klink, Wenze Kok, Elfried Perik, Thijs de Pooter, Jacco Wittkämper, Frits |
author_sort | de Prez, Leon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: External dosimetry audits are powerful quality assurance instruments for radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to implement an electron dosimetry audit based on a contemporary code of practice within the requirements for calibration laboratories performing proficiency tests. This involved the determination of suitable acceptance criteria based on thorough uncertainty analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subject of the audit was the determination of absorbed dose to water, D(w), and the beam quality specifier, R(50,dos). Fifteen electron beams were measured in four institutes according to the Belgian-Dutch code of practice for high-energy electron beams. The expanded uncertainty (k = 2) for the D(w) values was 3.6% for a Roos chamber calibrated in (60)Co and 3.2% for a Roos chamber cross-calibrated against a Farmer chamber. The expanded uncertainty for the beam quality specifier, R(50,dos), was 0.14 cm. The audit acceptance levels were based on the expanded uncertainties for the comparison results and estimated to be 2.4%. RESULTS: The audit was implemented and validated successfully. All D(w) audit results were satisfactory with differences in D(w) values mostly smaller than 0.5% and always smaller than 1%. Except for one, differences in R(50,dos) were smaller than 0.2 cm and always smaller than 0.3 cm. CONCLUSIONS: An electron dosimetry audit based on absorbed dose to water and present-day requirements for calibration laboratories performing proficiency tests was successfully implemented. It proved international traceability of the participants value with an uncertainty better than 3.6% (k = 2). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7807662 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78076622021-01-14 An on-site dosimetry audit for high-energy electron beams de Prez, Leon Heukelom, Stan Jansen, Bartel Jansen, Wim van de Kamer, Jeroen van Klink, Wenze Kok, Elfried Perik, Thijs de Pooter, Jacco Wittkämper, Frits Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: External dosimetry audits are powerful quality assurance instruments for radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to implement an electron dosimetry audit based on a contemporary code of practice within the requirements for calibration laboratories performing proficiency tests. This involved the determination of suitable acceptance criteria based on thorough uncertainty analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subject of the audit was the determination of absorbed dose to water, D(w), and the beam quality specifier, R(50,dos). Fifteen electron beams were measured in four institutes according to the Belgian-Dutch code of practice for high-energy electron beams. The expanded uncertainty (k = 2) for the D(w) values was 3.6% for a Roos chamber calibrated in (60)Co and 3.2% for a Roos chamber cross-calibrated against a Farmer chamber. The expanded uncertainty for the beam quality specifier, R(50,dos), was 0.14 cm. The audit acceptance levels were based on the expanded uncertainties for the comparison results and estimated to be 2.4%. RESULTS: The audit was implemented and validated successfully. All D(w) audit results were satisfactory with differences in D(w) values mostly smaller than 0.5% and always smaller than 1%. Except for one, differences in R(50,dos) were smaller than 0.2 cm and always smaller than 0.3 cm. CONCLUSIONS: An electron dosimetry audit based on absorbed dose to water and present-day requirements for calibration laboratories performing proficiency tests was successfully implemented. It proved international traceability of the participants value with an uncertainty better than 3.6% (k = 2). Elsevier 2018-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7807662/ /pubmed/33458368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2018.02.001 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article de Prez, Leon Heukelom, Stan Jansen, Bartel Jansen, Wim van de Kamer, Jeroen van Klink, Wenze Kok, Elfried Perik, Thijs de Pooter, Jacco Wittkämper, Frits An on-site dosimetry audit for high-energy electron beams |
title | An on-site dosimetry audit for high-energy electron beams |
title_full | An on-site dosimetry audit for high-energy electron beams |
title_fullStr | An on-site dosimetry audit for high-energy electron beams |
title_full_unstemmed | An on-site dosimetry audit for high-energy electron beams |
title_short | An on-site dosimetry audit for high-energy electron beams |
title_sort | on-site dosimetry audit for high-energy electron beams |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2018.02.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deprezleon anonsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT heukelomstan anonsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT jansenbartel anonsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT jansenwim anonsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT vandekamerjeroen anonsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT vanklinkwenze anonsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT kokelfried anonsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT perikthijs anonsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT depooterjacco anonsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT wittkamperfrits anonsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT deprezleon onsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT heukelomstan onsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT jansenbartel onsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT jansenwim onsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT vandekamerjeroen onsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT vanklinkwenze onsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT kokelfried onsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT perikthijs onsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT depooterjacco onsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams AT wittkamperfrits onsitedosimetryauditforhighenergyelectronbeams |