Cargando…

Multivariate log file analysis for multi-leaf collimator failure prediction in radiotherapy delivery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Motor failure in multi-leaf collimators (MLC) is a common reason for unscheduled accelerator maintenance, disrupting the workflow of a radiotherapy treatment centre. Predicting MLC replacement needs ahead of time would allow for proactive maintenance scheduling, reducing the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wojtasik, Arkadiusz Mariusz, Bolt, Matthew, Clark, Catharine H., Nisbet, Andrew, Chen, Tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.07.011
_version_ 1783636791449878528
author Wojtasik, Arkadiusz Mariusz
Bolt, Matthew
Clark, Catharine H.
Nisbet, Andrew
Chen, Tao
author_facet Wojtasik, Arkadiusz Mariusz
Bolt, Matthew
Clark, Catharine H.
Nisbet, Andrew
Chen, Tao
author_sort Wojtasik, Arkadiusz Mariusz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Motor failure in multi-leaf collimators (MLC) is a common reason for unscheduled accelerator maintenance, disrupting the workflow of a radiotherapy treatment centre. Predicting MLC replacement needs ahead of time would allow for proactive maintenance scheduling, reducing the impact MLC replacement has on treatment workflow. We propose a multivariate approach to analysis of trajectory log data, which can be used to predict upcoming MLC replacement needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trajectory log files from two accelerators, spanning six and seven months respectively, have been collected and analysed. The average error in each of the parameters for each log file was calculated and used for further analysis. A performance index (PI) was generated by applying moving window principal component analysis to the prepared data. Drops in the PI were thought to indicate an upcoming MLC replacement requirement; therefore, PI was tracked with exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control charts complete with a lower control limit. RESULTS: The best compromise of fault detection and minimising false alarm rate was achieved using a weighting parameter (λ) of 0.05 and a control limit based on three standard deviations and an 80 data point window. The approach identified eight out of thirteen logged MLC replacements, one to three working days in advance whilst, on average, raising a false alarm, on average, 1.1 times a month. CONCLUSIONS: This approach to analysing trajectory log data has been shown to enable prediction of certain upcoming MLC failures, albeit at a cost of false alarms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78076702021-01-14 Multivariate log file analysis for multi-leaf collimator failure prediction in radiotherapy delivery Wojtasik, Arkadiusz Mariusz Bolt, Matthew Clark, Catharine H. Nisbet, Andrew Chen, Tao Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Motor failure in multi-leaf collimators (MLC) is a common reason for unscheduled accelerator maintenance, disrupting the workflow of a radiotherapy treatment centre. Predicting MLC replacement needs ahead of time would allow for proactive maintenance scheduling, reducing the impact MLC replacement has on treatment workflow. We propose a multivariate approach to analysis of trajectory log data, which can be used to predict upcoming MLC replacement needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trajectory log files from two accelerators, spanning six and seven months respectively, have been collected and analysed. The average error in each of the parameters for each log file was calculated and used for further analysis. A performance index (PI) was generated by applying moving window principal component analysis to the prepared data. Drops in the PI were thought to indicate an upcoming MLC replacement requirement; therefore, PI was tracked with exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control charts complete with a lower control limit. RESULTS: The best compromise of fault detection and minimising false alarm rate was achieved using a weighting parameter (λ) of 0.05 and a control limit based on three standard deviations and an 80 data point window. The approach identified eight out of thirteen logged MLC replacements, one to three working days in advance whilst, on average, raising a false alarm, on average, 1.1 times a month. CONCLUSIONS: This approach to analysing trajectory log data has been shown to enable prediction of certain upcoming MLC failures, albeit at a cost of false alarms. Elsevier 2020-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7807670/ /pubmed/33458329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.07.011 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society of Radiotherapy & Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Wojtasik, Arkadiusz Mariusz
Bolt, Matthew
Clark, Catharine H.
Nisbet, Andrew
Chen, Tao
Multivariate log file analysis for multi-leaf collimator failure prediction in radiotherapy delivery
title Multivariate log file analysis for multi-leaf collimator failure prediction in radiotherapy delivery
title_full Multivariate log file analysis for multi-leaf collimator failure prediction in radiotherapy delivery
title_fullStr Multivariate log file analysis for multi-leaf collimator failure prediction in radiotherapy delivery
title_full_unstemmed Multivariate log file analysis for multi-leaf collimator failure prediction in radiotherapy delivery
title_short Multivariate log file analysis for multi-leaf collimator failure prediction in radiotherapy delivery
title_sort multivariate log file analysis for multi-leaf collimator failure prediction in radiotherapy delivery
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.07.011
work_keys_str_mv AT wojtasikarkadiuszmariusz multivariatelogfileanalysisformultileafcollimatorfailurepredictioninradiotherapydelivery
AT boltmatthew multivariatelogfileanalysisformultileafcollimatorfailurepredictioninradiotherapydelivery
AT clarkcatharineh multivariatelogfileanalysisformultileafcollimatorfailurepredictioninradiotherapydelivery
AT nisbetandrew multivariatelogfileanalysisformultileafcollimatorfailurepredictioninradiotherapydelivery
AT chentao multivariatelogfileanalysisformultileafcollimatorfailurepredictioninradiotherapydelivery