Cargando…

A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is one of the most effective cancer treatment techniques, however, delivering the optimal radiation dosage is challenging due to movements of the patient during treatment. Immobilisation devices are typically used to minimise motion. This paper reviews published...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asfia, Amirhossein, Novak, James I., Mohammed, Mazher Iqbal, Rolfe, Bernard, Kron, Tomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.03.003
_version_ 1783636791718313984
author Asfia, Amirhossein
Novak, James I.
Mohammed, Mazher Iqbal
Rolfe, Bernard
Kron, Tomas
author_facet Asfia, Amirhossein
Novak, James I.
Mohammed, Mazher Iqbal
Rolfe, Bernard
Kron, Tomas
author_sort Asfia, Amirhossein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is one of the most effective cancer treatment techniques, however, delivering the optimal radiation dosage is challenging due to movements of the patient during treatment. Immobilisation devices are typically used to minimise motion. This paper reviews published research investigating the use of 3D printing (additive manufacturing) to produce patient-specific immobilisation devices, and compares these to traditional devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted across thirty-eight databases, with results limited to those published between January 2000 and January 2019. A total of eighteen papers suitably detailed the use of 3D printing to manufacture and test immobilisers, and were included in this review. This included ten journal papers, five posters, two conference papers and one thesis. RESULTS: 61% of relevant studies featured human subjects, 22% focussed on animal subjects, 11% used phantoms, and one study utilised experimental test methods. Advantages of 3D printed immobilisers reported in literature included improved patient experience and comfort over traditional methods, as well as high levels of accuracy between immobiliser and patient, repeatable setup, and similar beam attenuation properties to thermoformed immobilisers. Disadvantages included the slow 3D printing process and the potential for inaccuracies in the digitisation of patient geometry. CONCLUSION: It was found that a lack of technical knowledge, combined with disparate studies with small patient samples, required further research in order to validate claims supporting the benefits of 3D printing to improve patient comfort or treatment accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78076712021-01-14 A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy Asfia, Amirhossein Novak, James I. Mohammed, Mazher Iqbal Rolfe, Bernard Kron, Tomas Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is one of the most effective cancer treatment techniques, however, delivering the optimal radiation dosage is challenging due to movements of the patient during treatment. Immobilisation devices are typically used to minimise motion. This paper reviews published research investigating the use of 3D printing (additive manufacturing) to produce patient-specific immobilisation devices, and compares these to traditional devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted across thirty-eight databases, with results limited to those published between January 2000 and January 2019. A total of eighteen papers suitably detailed the use of 3D printing to manufacture and test immobilisers, and were included in this review. This included ten journal papers, five posters, two conference papers and one thesis. RESULTS: 61% of relevant studies featured human subjects, 22% focussed on animal subjects, 11% used phantoms, and one study utilised experimental test methods. Advantages of 3D printed immobilisers reported in literature included improved patient experience and comfort over traditional methods, as well as high levels of accuracy between immobiliser and patient, repeatable setup, and similar beam attenuation properties to thermoformed immobilisers. Disadvantages included the slow 3D printing process and the potential for inaccuracies in the digitisation of patient geometry. CONCLUSION: It was found that a lack of technical knowledge, combined with disparate studies with small patient samples, required further research in order to validate claims supporting the benefits of 3D printing to improve patient comfort or treatment accuracy. Elsevier 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7807671/ /pubmed/33458304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.03.003 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Asfia, Amirhossein
Novak, James I.
Mohammed, Mazher Iqbal
Rolfe, Bernard
Kron, Tomas
A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy
title A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy
title_full A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy
title_fullStr A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy
title_short A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy
title_sort review of 3d printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.03.003
work_keys_str_mv AT asfiaamirhossein areviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy
AT novakjamesi areviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy
AT mohammedmazheriqbal areviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy
AT rolfebernard areviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy
AT krontomas areviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy
AT asfiaamirhossein reviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy
AT novakjamesi reviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy
AT mohammedmazheriqbal reviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy
AT rolfebernard reviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy
AT krontomas reviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy