Cargando…
A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is one of the most effective cancer treatment techniques, however, delivering the optimal radiation dosage is challenging due to movements of the patient during treatment. Immobilisation devices are typically used to minimise motion. This paper reviews published...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.03.003 |
_version_ | 1783636791718313984 |
---|---|
author | Asfia, Amirhossein Novak, James I. Mohammed, Mazher Iqbal Rolfe, Bernard Kron, Tomas |
author_facet | Asfia, Amirhossein Novak, James I. Mohammed, Mazher Iqbal Rolfe, Bernard Kron, Tomas |
author_sort | Asfia, Amirhossein |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is one of the most effective cancer treatment techniques, however, delivering the optimal radiation dosage is challenging due to movements of the patient during treatment. Immobilisation devices are typically used to minimise motion. This paper reviews published research investigating the use of 3D printing (additive manufacturing) to produce patient-specific immobilisation devices, and compares these to traditional devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted across thirty-eight databases, with results limited to those published between January 2000 and January 2019. A total of eighteen papers suitably detailed the use of 3D printing to manufacture and test immobilisers, and were included in this review. This included ten journal papers, five posters, two conference papers and one thesis. RESULTS: 61% of relevant studies featured human subjects, 22% focussed on animal subjects, 11% used phantoms, and one study utilised experimental test methods. Advantages of 3D printed immobilisers reported in literature included improved patient experience and comfort over traditional methods, as well as high levels of accuracy between immobiliser and patient, repeatable setup, and similar beam attenuation properties to thermoformed immobilisers. Disadvantages included the slow 3D printing process and the potential for inaccuracies in the digitisation of patient geometry. CONCLUSION: It was found that a lack of technical knowledge, combined with disparate studies with small patient samples, required further research in order to validate claims supporting the benefits of 3D printing to improve patient comfort or treatment accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7807671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78076712021-01-14 A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy Asfia, Amirhossein Novak, James I. Mohammed, Mazher Iqbal Rolfe, Bernard Kron, Tomas Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is one of the most effective cancer treatment techniques, however, delivering the optimal radiation dosage is challenging due to movements of the patient during treatment. Immobilisation devices are typically used to minimise motion. This paper reviews published research investigating the use of 3D printing (additive manufacturing) to produce patient-specific immobilisation devices, and compares these to traditional devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted across thirty-eight databases, with results limited to those published between January 2000 and January 2019. A total of eighteen papers suitably detailed the use of 3D printing to manufacture and test immobilisers, and were included in this review. This included ten journal papers, five posters, two conference papers and one thesis. RESULTS: 61% of relevant studies featured human subjects, 22% focussed on animal subjects, 11% used phantoms, and one study utilised experimental test methods. Advantages of 3D printed immobilisers reported in literature included improved patient experience and comfort over traditional methods, as well as high levels of accuracy between immobiliser and patient, repeatable setup, and similar beam attenuation properties to thermoformed immobilisers. Disadvantages included the slow 3D printing process and the potential for inaccuracies in the digitisation of patient geometry. CONCLUSION: It was found that a lack of technical knowledge, combined with disparate studies with small patient samples, required further research in order to validate claims supporting the benefits of 3D printing to improve patient comfort or treatment accuracy. Elsevier 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7807671/ /pubmed/33458304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.03.003 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Asfia, Amirhossein Novak, James I. Mohammed, Mazher Iqbal Rolfe, Bernard Kron, Tomas A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy |
title | A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy |
title_full | A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy |
title_short | A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy |
title_sort | review of 3d printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.03.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asfiaamirhossein areviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy AT novakjamesi areviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy AT mohammedmazheriqbal areviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy AT rolfebernard areviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy AT krontomas areviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy AT asfiaamirhossein reviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy AT novakjamesi reviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy AT mohammedmazheriqbal reviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy AT rolfebernard reviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy AT krontomas reviewof3dprintedpatientspecificimmobilisationdevicesinradiotherapy |