Cargando…

Measuring implanted patient response to tone pips

BACKGROUND: An electrical potential not previously reported—electrical cochlear response (ECR)—observed only in implanted patients is described. Its amplitude and growth slope are a measurement of the stimulation achieved by a tone pip on the auditory nerve. The stimulation and recording system cons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cornejo, Juan M., Quintana, Agar K., Beltran, Nohra E., Granados, Pilar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00844-6
_version_ 1783636796552249344
author Cornejo, Juan M.
Quintana, Agar K.
Beltran, Nohra E.
Granados, Pilar
author_facet Cornejo, Juan M.
Quintana, Agar K.
Beltran, Nohra E.
Granados, Pilar
author_sort Cornejo, Juan M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An electrical potential not previously reported—electrical cochlear response (ECR)—observed only in implanted patients is described. Its amplitude and growth slope are a measurement of the stimulation achieved by a tone pip on the auditory nerve. The stimulation and recording system constructed for this purpose, the features of this potential obtained in a group of 43 children, and its possible clinical use are described. The ECR is obtained by averaging the EEG epochs acquired each time the cochlear implant (CI) processes a tone pip of known frequency and intensity when the patient is sleeping and using the CI in everyday mode. The ECR is sensitive to tone pip intensity level, microphone sensitivity, sound processor gain, dynamic range of electrical current, and responsiveness to electrical current of the auditory nerve portion involved with the electrode under test. It allows individual evaluation of intracochlear electrodes by choosing, one at the time, the central frequency of the electrode as the test tone pip frequency, so the ECR measurement due to a variable intensity tone pip allows to establish the suitability of the dynamic range of the electrode current. RESULTS: There is a difference in ECR measurements when patients are grouped based on their auditory behavior. The ECR slope and amplitude for the Sensitive group is 0.2 μV/dB(HL) and 10 μV at 50 dB(HL) compared with 0.04 μV/dB(HL) and 3 μV at 50dB(HL) for the Inconsistent group. The clinical cases show that adjusting the dynamic range of current based on the ECR improved the patient’s auditory behavior. CONCLUSIONS: ECR can be recorded regardless of the artifact due to the electromyographic activity of the patient and the functioning of the CI. Its amplitude and growth slope versus the intensity of the stimulus differs between electrodes. The relationship between minimum ECR detection intensity level and auditory threshold suggests the possibility of estimating patient auditory thresholds this way. ECR does not depend on the subject’s age, cooperation, or health status. It can be obtained at any time after implant surgery and the test procedure is the same regardless of device manufacturer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78076922021-01-14 Measuring implanted patient response to tone pips Cornejo, Juan M. Quintana, Agar K. Beltran, Nohra E. Granados, Pilar Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: An electrical potential not previously reported—electrical cochlear response (ECR)—observed only in implanted patients is described. Its amplitude and growth slope are a measurement of the stimulation achieved by a tone pip on the auditory nerve. The stimulation and recording system constructed for this purpose, the features of this potential obtained in a group of 43 children, and its possible clinical use are described. The ECR is obtained by averaging the EEG epochs acquired each time the cochlear implant (CI) processes a tone pip of known frequency and intensity when the patient is sleeping and using the CI in everyday mode. The ECR is sensitive to tone pip intensity level, microphone sensitivity, sound processor gain, dynamic range of electrical current, and responsiveness to electrical current of the auditory nerve portion involved with the electrode under test. It allows individual evaluation of intracochlear electrodes by choosing, one at the time, the central frequency of the electrode as the test tone pip frequency, so the ECR measurement due to a variable intensity tone pip allows to establish the suitability of the dynamic range of the electrode current. RESULTS: There is a difference in ECR measurements when patients are grouped based on their auditory behavior. The ECR slope and amplitude for the Sensitive group is 0.2 μV/dB(HL) and 10 μV at 50 dB(HL) compared with 0.04 μV/dB(HL) and 3 μV at 50dB(HL) for the Inconsistent group. The clinical cases show that adjusting the dynamic range of current based on the ECR improved the patient’s auditory behavior. CONCLUSIONS: ECR can be recorded regardless of the artifact due to the electromyographic activity of the patient and the functioning of the CI. Its amplitude and growth slope versus the intensity of the stimulus differs between electrodes. The relationship between minimum ECR detection intensity level and auditory threshold suggests the possibility of estimating patient auditory thresholds this way. ECR does not depend on the subject’s age, cooperation, or health status. It can be obtained at any time after implant surgery and the test procedure is the same regardless of device manufacturer. BioMed Central 2021-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7807692/ /pubmed/33446195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00844-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Cornejo, Juan M.
Quintana, Agar K.
Beltran, Nohra E.
Granados, Pilar
Measuring implanted patient response to tone pips
title Measuring implanted patient response to tone pips
title_full Measuring implanted patient response to tone pips
title_fullStr Measuring implanted patient response to tone pips
title_full_unstemmed Measuring implanted patient response to tone pips
title_short Measuring implanted patient response to tone pips
title_sort measuring implanted patient response to tone pips
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00844-6
work_keys_str_mv AT cornejojuanm measuringimplantedpatientresponsetotonepips
AT quintanaagark measuringimplantedpatientresponsetotonepips
AT beltrannohrae measuringimplantedpatientresponsetotonepips
AT granadospilar measuringimplantedpatientresponsetotonepips