Cargando…

Dose accumulation to assess the validity of treatment plans with reduced margins in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Literature has reported reduced treatment toxicity in head-and-neck radiotherapy (HNRT) when reducing the planning target volume (PTV) margin from 5 to 3 mm but loco-regional control was not always preserved. This study used deformable image registration (DIR)-facilitated dos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lowther, Nicholas J., Marsh, Steven H., Louwe, Robert J.W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.05.004
_version_ 1783636797728751616
author Lowther, Nicholas J.
Marsh, Steven H.
Louwe, Robert J.W.
author_facet Lowther, Nicholas J.
Marsh, Steven H.
Louwe, Robert J.W.
author_sort Lowther, Nicholas J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Literature has reported reduced treatment toxicity in head-and-neck radiotherapy (HNRT) when reducing the planning target volume (PTV) margin from 5 to 3 mm but loco-regional control was not always preserved. This study used deformable image registration (DIR)-facilitated dose accumulation to assess clinical target volume (CTV) coverage in the presence of anatomical changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: VMAT plans for 12 patients were optimized using 3 or 5 mm PTV and planning risk volume (PRV) margins. The planning computed tomography (pCT) scan was registered to each daily cone beam CT (CBCT) using DIR. The inverse registration was used to reconstruct and accumulate dose ([Formula: see text]). CTV coverage was assessed using the dose-volume histogram (DVH) metric [Formula: see text] and by individual voxel analysis. Both approaches included an uncertainty estimate using the 95% level of confidence. RESULTS: [Formula: see text] was less than 95% of the prescribed dose [Formula: see text] for three cases including only one case where this was at the 95% level of confidence. However for many patients, the accumulated dose included a substantial volume of voxels receiving less than 95% [Formula: see text] independent of margin expansion, which predominantly occurred in the subdermal region. Loss in target coverage was very patient specific but tightness of target volume coverage at planning was a common factor leading to underdosage. CONCLUSION: This study agrees with previous literature that PTV/PRV margin reduction did not significantly reduce CTV coverage during treatment, but also highlighted that tight coverage of target volumes at planning increases the risk of clinically unacceptable dose delivery. Patient-specific verification of dose delivery to assess the dose delivered to each voxel is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78076972021-01-14 Dose accumulation to assess the validity of treatment plans with reduced margins in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer Lowther, Nicholas J. Marsh, Steven H. Louwe, Robert J.W. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Literature has reported reduced treatment toxicity in head-and-neck radiotherapy (HNRT) when reducing the planning target volume (PTV) margin from 5 to 3 mm but loco-regional control was not always preserved. This study used deformable image registration (DIR)-facilitated dose accumulation to assess clinical target volume (CTV) coverage in the presence of anatomical changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: VMAT plans for 12 patients were optimized using 3 or 5 mm PTV and planning risk volume (PRV) margins. The planning computed tomography (pCT) scan was registered to each daily cone beam CT (CBCT) using DIR. The inverse registration was used to reconstruct and accumulate dose ([Formula: see text]). CTV coverage was assessed using the dose-volume histogram (DVH) metric [Formula: see text] and by individual voxel analysis. Both approaches included an uncertainty estimate using the 95% level of confidence. RESULTS: [Formula: see text] was less than 95% of the prescribed dose [Formula: see text] for three cases including only one case where this was at the 95% level of confidence. However for many patients, the accumulated dose included a substantial volume of voxels receiving less than 95% [Formula: see text] independent of margin expansion, which predominantly occurred in the subdermal region. Loss in target coverage was very patient specific but tightness of target volume coverage at planning was a common factor leading to underdosage. CONCLUSION: This study agrees with previous literature that PTV/PRV margin reduction did not significantly reduce CTV coverage during treatment, but also highlighted that tight coverage of target volumes at planning increases the risk of clinically unacceptable dose delivery. Patient-specific verification of dose delivery to assess the dose delivered to each voxel is recommended. Elsevier 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7807697/ /pubmed/33458315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.05.004 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Lowther, Nicholas J.
Marsh, Steven H.
Louwe, Robert J.W.
Dose accumulation to assess the validity of treatment plans with reduced margins in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer
title Dose accumulation to assess the validity of treatment plans with reduced margins in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer
title_full Dose accumulation to assess the validity of treatment plans with reduced margins in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer
title_fullStr Dose accumulation to assess the validity of treatment plans with reduced margins in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer
title_full_unstemmed Dose accumulation to assess the validity of treatment plans with reduced margins in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer
title_short Dose accumulation to assess the validity of treatment plans with reduced margins in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer
title_sort dose accumulation to assess the validity of treatment plans with reduced margins in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.05.004
work_keys_str_mv AT lowthernicholasj doseaccumulationtoassessthevalidityoftreatmentplanswithreducedmarginsinradiotherapyofheadandneckcancer
AT marshstevenh doseaccumulationtoassessthevalidityoftreatmentplanswithreducedmarginsinradiotherapyofheadandneckcancer
AT louwerobertjw doseaccumulationtoassessthevalidityoftreatmentplanswithreducedmarginsinradiotherapyofheadandneckcancer