Cargando…

Validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in radiation therapy planning of prostate cancer (PC) to reduce target volume delineation uncertainty. This study aimed to assess and validate the performance of a fully automated segmentation tool (AST) in MRI based radia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuisma, Anna, Ranta, Iiro, Keyriläinen, Jani, Suilamo, Sami, Wright, Pauliina, Pesola, Marko, Warner, Lizette, Löyttyniemi, Eliisa, Minn, Heikki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.02.004
_version_ 1783636815144550400
author Kuisma, Anna
Ranta, Iiro
Keyriläinen, Jani
Suilamo, Sami
Wright, Pauliina
Pesola, Marko
Warner, Lizette
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Minn, Heikki
author_facet Kuisma, Anna
Ranta, Iiro
Keyriläinen, Jani
Suilamo, Sami
Wright, Pauliina
Pesola, Marko
Warner, Lizette
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Minn, Heikki
author_sort Kuisma, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in radiation therapy planning of prostate cancer (PC) to reduce target volume delineation uncertainty. This study aimed to assess and validate the performance of a fully automated segmentation tool (AST) in MRI based radiation therapy planning of PC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pelvic structures of 65 PC patients delineated in an MRI-only workflow according to established guidelines were included in the analysis. Automatic vs manual segmentation by an experienced oncologist was compared with geometrical parameters, such as the dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Fifteen patients had a second MRI within 15 days to assess repeatability of the AST for prostate and seminal vesicles. Furthermore, we investigated whether hormonal therapy or body mass index (BMI) affected the AST results. RESULTS: The AST showed high agreement with manual segmentation expressed as DSC (mean, SD) for delineating prostate (0.84, 0.04), bladder (0.92, 0.04) and rectum (0.86, 0.04). For seminal vesicles (0.56, 0.17) and penile bulb (0.69, 0.12) the respective agreement was moderate. Performance of AST was not influenced by neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, although those on treatment had significantly smaller prostates than the hormone-naïve patients (p < 0.0001). In repeat assessment, consistency of prostate delineation resulted in mean DSC of 0.89, (SD 0.03) between the paired MRI scans for AST, while mean DSC of manual delineation was 0.82, (SD 0.05). CONCLUSION: Fully automated MRI segmentation tool showed good agreement and repeatability compared with manual segmentation and was found clinically robust in patients with PC. However, manual review and adjustment of some structures in individual cases remain important in clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78077742021-01-14 Validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer Kuisma, Anna Ranta, Iiro Keyriläinen, Jani Suilamo, Sami Wright, Pauliina Pesola, Marko Warner, Lizette Löyttyniemi, Eliisa Minn, Heikki Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in radiation therapy planning of prostate cancer (PC) to reduce target volume delineation uncertainty. This study aimed to assess and validate the performance of a fully automated segmentation tool (AST) in MRI based radiation therapy planning of PC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pelvic structures of 65 PC patients delineated in an MRI-only workflow according to established guidelines were included in the analysis. Automatic vs manual segmentation by an experienced oncologist was compared with geometrical parameters, such as the dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Fifteen patients had a second MRI within 15 days to assess repeatability of the AST for prostate and seminal vesicles. Furthermore, we investigated whether hormonal therapy or body mass index (BMI) affected the AST results. RESULTS: The AST showed high agreement with manual segmentation expressed as DSC (mean, SD) for delineating prostate (0.84, 0.04), bladder (0.92, 0.04) and rectum (0.86, 0.04). For seminal vesicles (0.56, 0.17) and penile bulb (0.69, 0.12) the respective agreement was moderate. Performance of AST was not influenced by neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, although those on treatment had significantly smaller prostates than the hormone-naïve patients (p < 0.0001). In repeat assessment, consistency of prostate delineation resulted in mean DSC of 0.89, (SD 0.03) between the paired MRI scans for AST, while mean DSC of manual delineation was 0.82, (SD 0.05). CONCLUSION: Fully automated MRI segmentation tool showed good agreement and repeatability compared with manual segmentation and was found clinically robust in patients with PC. However, manual review and adjustment of some structures in individual cases remain important in clinical use. Elsevier 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7807774/ /pubmed/33458302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.02.004 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Kuisma, Anna
Ranta, Iiro
Keyriläinen, Jani
Suilamo, Sami
Wright, Pauliina
Pesola, Marko
Warner, Lizette
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Minn, Heikki
Validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer
title Validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer
title_full Validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer
title_fullStr Validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer
title_short Validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer
title_sort validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.02.004
work_keys_str_mv AT kuismaanna validationofautomatedmagneticresonanceimagesegmentationforradiationtherapyplanninginprostatecancer
AT rantaiiro validationofautomatedmagneticresonanceimagesegmentationforradiationtherapyplanninginprostatecancer
AT keyrilainenjani validationofautomatedmagneticresonanceimagesegmentationforradiationtherapyplanninginprostatecancer
AT suilamosami validationofautomatedmagneticresonanceimagesegmentationforradiationtherapyplanninginprostatecancer
AT wrightpauliina validationofautomatedmagneticresonanceimagesegmentationforradiationtherapyplanninginprostatecancer
AT pesolamarko validationofautomatedmagneticresonanceimagesegmentationforradiationtherapyplanninginprostatecancer
AT warnerlizette validationofautomatedmagneticresonanceimagesegmentationforradiationtherapyplanninginprostatecancer
AT loyttyniemieliisa validationofautomatedmagneticresonanceimagesegmentationforradiationtherapyplanninginprostatecancer
AT minnheikki validationofautomatedmagneticresonanceimagesegmentationforradiationtherapyplanninginprostatecancer