Cargando…

Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) is a parameter to model the round-leaf-end effect of multi-leaf collimators (MLC) that is important for treatment planning dose calculations in radiotherapy. In this study we investigated on the relationship between the DLG values and the dose calcul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jinkoo, Han, James S., Hsia, An Ting, Li, Shidong, Xu, Zhigang, Ryu, Samuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2018.01.003
_version_ 1783636829754359808
author Kim, Jinkoo
Han, James S.
Hsia, An Ting
Li, Shidong
Xu, Zhigang
Ryu, Samuel
author_facet Kim, Jinkoo
Han, James S.
Hsia, An Ting
Li, Shidong
Xu, Zhigang
Ryu, Samuel
author_sort Kim, Jinkoo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) is a parameter to model the round-leaf-end effect of multi-leaf collimators (MLC) that is important for treatment planning dose calculations in radiotherapy. In this study we investigated on the relationship between the DLG values and the dose calculation errors for a high-definition MLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three sets of experiments were conducted: (1) physical DLG measurements using sweeping-gap technique, (2) DLG adjustment based on spine radiosurgery plan measurements, and (3) DLG verification using films and ion-chambers (IC). All experiments were conducted on a Varian Edge machine equipped with HD120 MLC for 6X, 6XFFF, and 10XFFF (FFF: flattening filter free). The Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm was used for all dose calculations. RESULTS: The measured physical DLGs were 0.39 mm, 0.27 mm, and 0.42 mm for 6X, 6XFFF, and 10XFFF respectively. The calculated doses were lower by 4.2% (6X), 3.7% (6XFFF), and 6.8% (10XFFF) than the measured, while the adjusted DLG values with minimum errors were 1.1 mm, 0.9 mm, and 1.5 mm. The IC measurement errors were < 1%, and the film gamma pass rates (3%/3 mm) were greater than 97% for the spine plans. CONCLUSIONS: The calculated doses were systematically lower than measured doses with the physical DLG values. It was necessary to increase the DLG values to minimize the dose calculation uncertainty. The optimal DLG values may be specific to individual MLCs and beams and, thus, careful evaluation and verification are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78078682021-01-14 Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy Kim, Jinkoo Han, James S. Hsia, An Ting Li, Shidong Xu, Zhigang Ryu, Samuel Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) is a parameter to model the round-leaf-end effect of multi-leaf collimators (MLC) that is important for treatment planning dose calculations in radiotherapy. In this study we investigated on the relationship between the DLG values and the dose calculation errors for a high-definition MLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three sets of experiments were conducted: (1) physical DLG measurements using sweeping-gap technique, (2) DLG adjustment based on spine radiosurgery plan measurements, and (3) DLG verification using films and ion-chambers (IC). All experiments were conducted on a Varian Edge machine equipped with HD120 MLC for 6X, 6XFFF, and 10XFFF (FFF: flattening filter free). The Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm was used for all dose calculations. RESULTS: The measured physical DLGs were 0.39 mm, 0.27 mm, and 0.42 mm for 6X, 6XFFF, and 10XFFF respectively. The calculated doses were lower by 4.2% (6X), 3.7% (6XFFF), and 6.8% (10XFFF) than the measured, while the adjusted DLG values with minimum errors were 1.1 mm, 0.9 mm, and 1.5 mm. The IC measurement errors were < 1%, and the film gamma pass rates (3%/3 mm) were greater than 97% for the spine plans. CONCLUSIONS: The calculated doses were systematically lower than measured doses with the physical DLG values. It was necessary to increase the DLG values to minimize the dose calculation uncertainty. The optimal DLG values may be specific to individual MLCs and beams and, thus, careful evaluation and verification are warranted. Elsevier 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7807868/ /pubmed/33458366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2018.01.003 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Kim, Jinkoo
Han, James S.
Hsia, An Ting
Li, Shidong
Xu, Zhigang
Ryu, Samuel
Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy
title Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy
title_full Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy
title_fullStr Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy
title_short Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy
title_sort relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2018.01.003
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjinkoo relationshipbetweendosimetricleafgapanddosecalculationerrorsforhighdefinitionmultileafcollimatorsinradiotherapy
AT hanjamess relationshipbetweendosimetricleafgapanddosecalculationerrorsforhighdefinitionmultileafcollimatorsinradiotherapy
AT hsiaanting relationshipbetweendosimetricleafgapanddosecalculationerrorsforhighdefinitionmultileafcollimatorsinradiotherapy
AT lishidong relationshipbetweendosimetricleafgapanddosecalculationerrorsforhighdefinitionmultileafcollimatorsinradiotherapy
AT xuzhigang relationshipbetweendosimetricleafgapanddosecalculationerrorsforhighdefinitionmultileafcollimatorsinradiotherapy
AT ryusamuel relationshipbetweendosimetricleafgapanddosecalculationerrorsforhighdefinitionmultileafcollimatorsinradiotherapy