Cargando…

Evaluating the impact of cone-beam computed tomography scatter mitigation strategies on radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The scatter induced image quality degradation of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) prevents more advanced applications in radiotherapy. We evaluated the dose calculation accuracy on CBCT of various disease sites using different scatter mitigation strategies. MATERIALS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schröder, Lukas, Stankovic, Uros, Remeijer, Peter, Sonke, Jan-Jakob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2019.04.001
_version_ 1783636830712758272
author Schröder, Lukas
Stankovic, Uros
Remeijer, Peter
Sonke, Jan-Jakob
author_facet Schröder, Lukas
Stankovic, Uros
Remeijer, Peter
Sonke, Jan-Jakob
author_sort Schröder, Lukas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The scatter induced image quality degradation of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) prevents more advanced applications in radiotherapy. We evaluated the dose calculation accuracy on CBCT of various disease sites using different scatter mitigation strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT scans of two patient cohorts (C1, C2) were reconstructed using a uniform (USC) and an iterative scatter correction (ISC) method, combined with an anti-scatter grid (ASG). Head and neck (H&N), lung, pelvic region, and prostate patients were included. To achieve a high accuracy Hounsfield unit and physical density calibrations were performed. The dose distributions of the original treatment plans were analyzed with the γ evaluation method using criteria of 1%/2 mm using the planning CT as the reference. The investigated parameters were the mean γ (γ(mean)), the points in agreement (P(γ≤1)) and the 99th percentile (γ(1%)). RESULTS: Significant differences between USC and ISC in C1 were found for the lung and prostate, where the latter using the ISC produced the best results with medians of 0.38, 98%, and 1.1 for γ(mean), P(γ≤1) and γ(1%), respectively. For C2 the ISC with ASG showed an improvement for all imaging sites. The lung demonstrated the largest relative increase in accuracy with improvements between 48% and 54% for the medians of γ(mean), P(γ≤1) and γ(1%). CONCLUSIONS: The introduced method demonstrated high dosimetric accuracy for H&N, prostate and pelvic region if an ASG is applied. A significantly lower accuracy was seen for lung. The ISC yielded a higher robustness against scatter variations than the USC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78078722021-01-14 Evaluating the impact of cone-beam computed tomography scatter mitigation strategies on radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy Schröder, Lukas Stankovic, Uros Remeijer, Peter Sonke, Jan-Jakob Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The scatter induced image quality degradation of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) prevents more advanced applications in radiotherapy. We evaluated the dose calculation accuracy on CBCT of various disease sites using different scatter mitigation strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT scans of two patient cohorts (C1, C2) were reconstructed using a uniform (USC) and an iterative scatter correction (ISC) method, combined with an anti-scatter grid (ASG). Head and neck (H&N), lung, pelvic region, and prostate patients were included. To achieve a high accuracy Hounsfield unit and physical density calibrations were performed. The dose distributions of the original treatment plans were analyzed with the γ evaluation method using criteria of 1%/2 mm using the planning CT as the reference. The investigated parameters were the mean γ (γ(mean)), the points in agreement (P(γ≤1)) and the 99th percentile (γ(1%)). RESULTS: Significant differences between USC and ISC in C1 were found for the lung and prostate, where the latter using the ISC produced the best results with medians of 0.38, 98%, and 1.1 for γ(mean), P(γ≤1) and γ(1%), respectively. For C2 the ISC with ASG showed an improvement for all imaging sites. The lung demonstrated the largest relative increase in accuracy with improvements between 48% and 54% for the medians of γ(mean), P(γ≤1) and γ(1%). CONCLUSIONS: The introduced method demonstrated high dosimetric accuracy for H&N, prostate and pelvic region if an ASG is applied. A significantly lower accuracy was seen for lung. The ISC yielded a higher robustness against scatter variations than the USC. Elsevier 2019-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7807872/ /pubmed/33458266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2019.04.001 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Schröder, Lukas
Stankovic, Uros
Remeijer, Peter
Sonke, Jan-Jakob
Evaluating the impact of cone-beam computed tomography scatter mitigation strategies on radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy
title Evaluating the impact of cone-beam computed tomography scatter mitigation strategies on radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy
title_full Evaluating the impact of cone-beam computed tomography scatter mitigation strategies on radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy
title_fullStr Evaluating the impact of cone-beam computed tomography scatter mitigation strategies on radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the impact of cone-beam computed tomography scatter mitigation strategies on radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy
title_short Evaluating the impact of cone-beam computed tomography scatter mitigation strategies on radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy
title_sort evaluating the impact of cone-beam computed tomography scatter mitigation strategies on radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2019.04.001
work_keys_str_mv AT schroderlukas evaluatingtheimpactofconebeamcomputedtomographyscattermitigationstrategiesonradiotherapydosecalculationaccuracy
AT stankovicuros evaluatingtheimpactofconebeamcomputedtomographyscattermitigationstrategiesonradiotherapydosecalculationaccuracy
AT remeijerpeter evaluatingtheimpactofconebeamcomputedtomographyscattermitigationstrategiesonradiotherapydosecalculationaccuracy
AT sonkejanjakob evaluatingtheimpactofconebeamcomputedtomographyscattermitigationstrategiesonradiotherapydosecalculationaccuracy