Cargando…

A treatment planning study of combined carbon ion-beam plus photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Combined photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and sequential dose-escalated carbon ion beam therapy (IBT) is a technically advanced treatment option for head and neck malignancies. We proposed and evaluated an integrated planning strategy as opposed to an establishe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuppert, Christopher, Paul, Angela, Nill, Simeon, Schwahofer, Andrea, Debus, Jürgen, Sterzing, Florian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.06.008
_version_ 1783636831434178560
author Schuppert, Christopher
Paul, Angela
Nill, Simeon
Schwahofer, Andrea
Debus, Jürgen
Sterzing, Florian
author_facet Schuppert, Christopher
Paul, Angela
Nill, Simeon
Schwahofer, Andrea
Debus, Jürgen
Sterzing, Florian
author_sort Schuppert, Christopher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Combined photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and sequential dose-escalated carbon ion beam therapy (IBT) is a technically advanced treatment option for head and neck malignancies. We proposed and evaluated an integrated planning strategy as opposed to an established and largely separated planning workflow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with representative malignancies of the head and neck region underwent combined carbon-photon radiotherapy (RT) in our facilities. Clinical plans were created according to the separated workflow with independent optimization stages for both modalities. Experimental plans incorporated the existing carbon IBT dose distribution into the optimization stage of a step-and-shoot photon IMRT (bias dose planning). RESULTS: Cumulative dose distributions showed statistically significant differences between the two planning strategies and were predominantly in favor of the integrated approach. As such, target irradiation was generally maintained or even improved in a subset of metrics, while normal tissue sparing was widely enhanced; for instance, in the ipsilateral temporal lobe with median D(mean) of −16% (p < 0.001). Maximum doses D(1%) (with adjustment for different fractionation) fell below thresholds for toxicity risk in a minority of instances, where they were previously exceeded. Integral dose did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that combination planning of carbon-photon RT for head and neck malignancies may benefit from a proposed bias dose method, yielding favorable dose distribution characteristics and a streamlined planning workflow with fewer plan revisions. Further research is necessary to validate these observations in terms of robustness and their potential for higher tumor control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78078752021-01-14 A treatment planning study of combined carbon ion-beam plus photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy Schuppert, Christopher Paul, Angela Nill, Simeon Schwahofer, Andrea Debus, Jürgen Sterzing, Florian Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Combined photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and sequential dose-escalated carbon ion beam therapy (IBT) is a technically advanced treatment option for head and neck malignancies. We proposed and evaluated an integrated planning strategy as opposed to an established and largely separated planning workflow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with representative malignancies of the head and neck region underwent combined carbon-photon radiotherapy (RT) in our facilities. Clinical plans were created according to the separated workflow with independent optimization stages for both modalities. Experimental plans incorporated the existing carbon IBT dose distribution into the optimization stage of a step-and-shoot photon IMRT (bias dose planning). RESULTS: Cumulative dose distributions showed statistically significant differences between the two planning strategies and were predominantly in favor of the integrated approach. As such, target irradiation was generally maintained or even improved in a subset of metrics, while normal tissue sparing was widely enhanced; for instance, in the ipsilateral temporal lobe with median D(mean) of −16% (p < 0.001). Maximum doses D(1%) (with adjustment for different fractionation) fell below thresholds for toxicity risk in a minority of instances, where they were previously exceeded. Integral dose did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that combination planning of carbon-photon RT for head and neck malignancies may benefit from a proposed bias dose method, yielding favorable dose distribution characteristics and a streamlined planning workflow with fewer plan revisions. Further research is necessary to validate these observations in terms of robustness and their potential for higher tumor control. Elsevier 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7807875/ /pubmed/33458321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.06.008 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Schuppert, Christopher
Paul, Angela
Nill, Simeon
Schwahofer, Andrea
Debus, Jürgen
Sterzing, Florian
A treatment planning study of combined carbon ion-beam plus photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title A treatment planning study of combined carbon ion-beam plus photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_full A treatment planning study of combined carbon ion-beam plus photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_fullStr A treatment planning study of combined carbon ion-beam plus photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed A treatment planning study of combined carbon ion-beam plus photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_short A treatment planning study of combined carbon ion-beam plus photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_sort treatment planning study of combined carbon ion-beam plus photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.06.008
work_keys_str_mv AT schuppertchristopher atreatmentplanningstudyofcombinedcarbonionbeamplusphotonintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT paulangela atreatmentplanningstudyofcombinedcarbonionbeamplusphotonintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT nillsimeon atreatmentplanningstudyofcombinedcarbonionbeamplusphotonintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT schwahoferandrea atreatmentplanningstudyofcombinedcarbonionbeamplusphotonintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT debusjurgen atreatmentplanningstudyofcombinedcarbonionbeamplusphotonintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT sterzingflorian atreatmentplanningstudyofcombinedcarbonionbeamplusphotonintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT schuppertchristopher treatmentplanningstudyofcombinedcarbonionbeamplusphotonintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT paulangela treatmentplanningstudyofcombinedcarbonionbeamplusphotonintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT nillsimeon treatmentplanningstudyofcombinedcarbonionbeamplusphotonintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT schwahoferandrea treatmentplanningstudyofcombinedcarbonionbeamplusphotonintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT debusjurgen treatmentplanningstudyofcombinedcarbonionbeamplusphotonintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT sterzingflorian treatmentplanningstudyofcombinedcarbonionbeamplusphotonintensitymodulatedradiotherapy