Cargando…

Utility of Equivalence and Cognition Models in Enhancing Validity of Translated Questionnaires: A Methodological Example Using the Heart Quality-of-Life Questionnaire

BACKGROUND: The cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires has tenuous theoretical underpinnings that limit the rigor of data collection and the meaningful analysis of cognitive interview data. An adaptation of existing models of equivalence and cognition provides structure to the comprehensive inv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LEE, Wan Ling, LIM ABDULLAH, Khatijah, CHINNA, Karuthan, ABIDIN, Imran Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000414
_version_ 1783636879657140224
author LEE, Wan Ling
LIM ABDULLAH, Khatijah
CHINNA, Karuthan
ABIDIN, Imran Z.
author_facet LEE, Wan Ling
LIM ABDULLAH, Khatijah
CHINNA, Karuthan
ABIDIN, Imran Z.
author_sort LEE, Wan Ling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires has tenuous theoretical underpinnings that limit the rigor of data collection and the meaningful analysis of cognitive interview data. An adaptation of existing models of equivalence and cognition provides structure to the comprehensive investigation of various equivalence types in enhancing the validity of translated questionnaires. PURPOSE: In this study, a framework comprising equivalence and cognition models was used to assess and finalize the Heart Quality-of-Life (HeartQoL)-Bahasa Malaysia (BM) questionnaire, which was derived from both forward–backward (FB) and dual-panel (DP) translation methods. METHODS: Investigation and finalization of two initial versions of the questionnaire were conducted based on findings from an expert assessment (n = 3 sociolinguists blinded to translation methods) and cognitive interviews with purposively sampled patients (FB: n = 11; DP: n = 11). The equivalence model of Herdman et al. and the question-and-answer model of Collins were adapted to form a “cognition-and-equivalence” model to guide data collection and analysis through modified cognitive interviews. The final HeartQoL-BM was completed by 373 patients with ischemic heart disease from two medical centers, and the data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis to assess the evidence of equivalence. RESULTS: Findings from the expert assessment and cognitive interview showed the existence of semantic and item equivalence on almost all of the FB and DP items, identified some subtle potential equivalence gaps, and guided the process of item finalization. Confirmatory factor analysis, including tests of factorial invariance on the final two-factor model of HeartQoL-BM, confirmed conceptual, item, measurement, and operational equivalence, which supports functional equivalence. CONCLUSIONS: The potential use of the cognition-and-equivalence model for modified cognitive interviewing and the application of the six equivalence types of Herdman et al. were supported by the HeartQoL-BM showing functional equivalence with its source. HeartQoL-BM is a potentially valid measure of health-related quality of life for patients with ischemic heart disease independent of conditions such as angina, myocardial infarction, and heart failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7808346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78083462021-01-27 Utility of Equivalence and Cognition Models in Enhancing Validity of Translated Questionnaires: A Methodological Example Using the Heart Quality-of-Life Questionnaire LEE, Wan Ling LIM ABDULLAH, Khatijah CHINNA, Karuthan ABIDIN, Imran Z. J Nurs Res Original Articles BACKGROUND: The cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires has tenuous theoretical underpinnings that limit the rigor of data collection and the meaningful analysis of cognitive interview data. An adaptation of existing models of equivalence and cognition provides structure to the comprehensive investigation of various equivalence types in enhancing the validity of translated questionnaires. PURPOSE: In this study, a framework comprising equivalence and cognition models was used to assess and finalize the Heart Quality-of-Life (HeartQoL)-Bahasa Malaysia (BM) questionnaire, which was derived from both forward–backward (FB) and dual-panel (DP) translation methods. METHODS: Investigation and finalization of two initial versions of the questionnaire were conducted based on findings from an expert assessment (n = 3 sociolinguists blinded to translation methods) and cognitive interviews with purposively sampled patients (FB: n = 11; DP: n = 11). The equivalence model of Herdman et al. and the question-and-answer model of Collins were adapted to form a “cognition-and-equivalence” model to guide data collection and analysis through modified cognitive interviews. The final HeartQoL-BM was completed by 373 patients with ischemic heart disease from two medical centers, and the data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis to assess the evidence of equivalence. RESULTS: Findings from the expert assessment and cognitive interview showed the existence of semantic and item equivalence on almost all of the FB and DP items, identified some subtle potential equivalence gaps, and guided the process of item finalization. Confirmatory factor analysis, including tests of factorial invariance on the final two-factor model of HeartQoL-BM, confirmed conceptual, item, measurement, and operational equivalence, which supports functional equivalence. CONCLUSIONS: The potential use of the cognition-and-equivalence model for modified cognitive interviewing and the application of the six equivalence types of Herdman et al. were supported by the HeartQoL-BM showing functional equivalence with its source. HeartQoL-BM is a potentially valid measure of health-related quality of life for patients with ischemic heart disease independent of conditions such as angina, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7808346/ /pubmed/33284136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000414 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
LEE, Wan Ling
LIM ABDULLAH, Khatijah
CHINNA, Karuthan
ABIDIN, Imran Z.
Utility of Equivalence and Cognition Models in Enhancing Validity of Translated Questionnaires: A Methodological Example Using the Heart Quality-of-Life Questionnaire
title Utility of Equivalence and Cognition Models in Enhancing Validity of Translated Questionnaires: A Methodological Example Using the Heart Quality-of-Life Questionnaire
title_full Utility of Equivalence and Cognition Models in Enhancing Validity of Translated Questionnaires: A Methodological Example Using the Heart Quality-of-Life Questionnaire
title_fullStr Utility of Equivalence and Cognition Models in Enhancing Validity of Translated Questionnaires: A Methodological Example Using the Heart Quality-of-Life Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Utility of Equivalence and Cognition Models in Enhancing Validity of Translated Questionnaires: A Methodological Example Using the Heart Quality-of-Life Questionnaire
title_short Utility of Equivalence and Cognition Models in Enhancing Validity of Translated Questionnaires: A Methodological Example Using the Heart Quality-of-Life Questionnaire
title_sort utility of equivalence and cognition models in enhancing validity of translated questionnaires: a methodological example using the heart quality-of-life questionnaire
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000414
work_keys_str_mv AT leewanling utilityofequivalenceandcognitionmodelsinenhancingvalidityoftranslatedquestionnairesamethodologicalexampleusingtheheartqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT limabdullahkhatijah utilityofequivalenceandcognitionmodelsinenhancingvalidityoftranslatedquestionnairesamethodologicalexampleusingtheheartqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT chinnakaruthan utilityofequivalenceandcognitionmodelsinenhancingvalidityoftranslatedquestionnairesamethodologicalexampleusingtheheartqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT abidinimranz utilityofequivalenceandcognitionmodelsinenhancingvalidityoftranslatedquestionnairesamethodologicalexampleusingtheheartqualityoflifequestionnaire