Cargando…

Differential actions of indomethacin: clinical relevance in headache

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, are used routinely in the treatment of primary headache disorders. Indomethacin is unique in its use in the diagnosis and treatment of hemicrania continua and paroxysmal hemicrania. The mechanism of this specific action is not fully un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Summ, Oliver, Andreou, Anna P., Akerman, Simon, Holland, Philip R., Hoffmann, Jan, Goadsby, Peter J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32796319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002032
_version_ 1783636881339056128
author Summ, Oliver
Andreou, Anna P.
Akerman, Simon
Holland, Philip R.
Hoffmann, Jan
Goadsby, Peter J.
author_facet Summ, Oliver
Andreou, Anna P.
Akerman, Simon
Holland, Philip R.
Hoffmann, Jan
Goadsby, Peter J.
author_sort Summ, Oliver
collection PubMed
description Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, are used routinely in the treatment of primary headache disorders. Indomethacin is unique in its use in the diagnosis and treatment of hemicrania continua and paroxysmal hemicrania. The mechanism of this specific action is not fully understood, although an interaction with nitric oxide (NO) signaling pathways has been suggested. Trigeminovascular neurons were activated by dural electrical stimulation, systemic administration of an NO donor, or local microiontophoresis of L-glutamate. Using electrophysiological techniques, we subsequently recorded the activation of trigeminovascular neurons and their responses to intravenous indomethacin, naproxen, and ibuprofen. Administration of indomethacin (5 mg·kg(−1)), ibuprofen (30 mg·kg(−1)), or naproxen (30 mg·kg(−1)) inhibited dural-evoked firing within the trigeminocervical complex with different temporal profiles. Similarly, both indomethacin and naproxen inhibited L-glutamate-evoked cell firing suggesting a common action. By contrast, only indomethacin was able to inhibit NO-induced firing. The differences in profile of effect of indomethacin may be fundamental to its ability to treat paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua. The data implicate NO-related signaling as a potential therapeutic approach to these disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7808353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78083532021-01-27 Differential actions of indomethacin: clinical relevance in headache Summ, Oliver Andreou, Anna P. Akerman, Simon Holland, Philip R. Hoffmann, Jan Goadsby, Peter J. Pain Research Paper Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, are used routinely in the treatment of primary headache disorders. Indomethacin is unique in its use in the diagnosis and treatment of hemicrania continua and paroxysmal hemicrania. The mechanism of this specific action is not fully understood, although an interaction with nitric oxide (NO) signaling pathways has been suggested. Trigeminovascular neurons were activated by dural electrical stimulation, systemic administration of an NO donor, or local microiontophoresis of L-glutamate. Using electrophysiological techniques, we subsequently recorded the activation of trigeminovascular neurons and their responses to intravenous indomethacin, naproxen, and ibuprofen. Administration of indomethacin (5 mg·kg(−1)), ibuprofen (30 mg·kg(−1)), or naproxen (30 mg·kg(−1)) inhibited dural-evoked firing within the trigeminocervical complex with different temporal profiles. Similarly, both indomethacin and naproxen inhibited L-glutamate-evoked cell firing suggesting a common action. By contrast, only indomethacin was able to inhibit NO-induced firing. The differences in profile of effect of indomethacin may be fundamental to its ability to treat paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua. The data implicate NO-related signaling as a potential therapeutic approach to these disorders. Wolters Kluwer 2021-02 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7808353/ /pubmed/32796319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002032 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Pain. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Summ, Oliver
Andreou, Anna P.
Akerman, Simon
Holland, Philip R.
Hoffmann, Jan
Goadsby, Peter J.
Differential actions of indomethacin: clinical relevance in headache
title Differential actions of indomethacin: clinical relevance in headache
title_full Differential actions of indomethacin: clinical relevance in headache
title_fullStr Differential actions of indomethacin: clinical relevance in headache
title_full_unstemmed Differential actions of indomethacin: clinical relevance in headache
title_short Differential actions of indomethacin: clinical relevance in headache
title_sort differential actions of indomethacin: clinical relevance in headache
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32796319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002032
work_keys_str_mv AT summoliver differentialactionsofindomethacinclinicalrelevanceinheadache
AT andreouannap differentialactionsofindomethacinclinicalrelevanceinheadache
AT akermansimon differentialactionsofindomethacinclinicalrelevanceinheadache
AT hollandphilipr differentialactionsofindomethacinclinicalrelevanceinheadache
AT hoffmannjan differentialactionsofindomethacinclinicalrelevanceinheadache
AT goadsbypeterj differentialactionsofindomethacinclinicalrelevanceinheadache