Cargando…
Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap
PURPOSE: Geographic disparities for assisted reproductive technology (ART) continue to exist. Travel cost and time off work may create additional barriers for patients living remotely. Implementing telehealth can alleviate these barriers by reducing office visits. The aim of this study was to evalua...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02027-7 |
_version_ | 1783636957662806016 |
---|---|
author | Mikhael, Sasha Gaidis, Anna Gavrilova-Jordan, Larisa |
author_facet | Mikhael, Sasha Gaidis, Anna Gavrilova-Jordan, Larisa |
author_sort | Mikhael, Sasha |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Geographic disparities for assisted reproductive technology (ART) continue to exist. Travel cost and time off work may create additional barriers for patients living remotely. Implementing telehealth can alleviate these barriers by reducing office visits. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction with telehealth during ART. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey and retrospective cohort study. Patients living remotely who underwent ART utilizing telehealth between 2015 and 2018 at a single institution were selected for the telehealth group. The non-telehealth control group included randomly selected patients who underwent IVF at the same institution between 2015 and 2018. Demographic variables and treatment outcomes were obtained for both groups. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was distributed to telehealth patients. Statistical analysis using χ(2) test was performed to compare ART outcomes between both groups. RESULTS: Ninety-seven control and 97 telehealth patients were included. For telehealth patients, the mean number of office visits and distance traveled was 2.9 (± 0.8 SD) and 143.1 miles (± 49.2 SD) respectively. 58.8% of patients completed the survey. 44/57 participants had an oocyte retrieval and 42/44 underwent embryo transfer. For those who completed the survey, the clinical pregnancy rate was 31/44 and the live birth rate was 25/44. There was no difference in treatment outcomes between telehealth compared to controls. 73% of patients were highly satisfied with telehealth. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth can improve access to ART in underserved areas and results in high patient satisfaction. Reproductive health providers could consider telehealth as a safe and efficacious tool to ameliorate geographic disparities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7808701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78087012021-01-15 Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap Mikhael, Sasha Gaidis, Anna Gavrilova-Jordan, Larisa J Assist Reprod Genet Assisted Reproduction Technologies PURPOSE: Geographic disparities for assisted reproductive technology (ART) continue to exist. Travel cost and time off work may create additional barriers for patients living remotely. Implementing telehealth can alleviate these barriers by reducing office visits. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction with telehealth during ART. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey and retrospective cohort study. Patients living remotely who underwent ART utilizing telehealth between 2015 and 2018 at a single institution were selected for the telehealth group. The non-telehealth control group included randomly selected patients who underwent IVF at the same institution between 2015 and 2018. Demographic variables and treatment outcomes were obtained for both groups. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was distributed to telehealth patients. Statistical analysis using χ(2) test was performed to compare ART outcomes between both groups. RESULTS: Ninety-seven control and 97 telehealth patients were included. For telehealth patients, the mean number of office visits and distance traveled was 2.9 (± 0.8 SD) and 143.1 miles (± 49.2 SD) respectively. 58.8% of patients completed the survey. 44/57 participants had an oocyte retrieval and 42/44 underwent embryo transfer. For those who completed the survey, the clinical pregnancy rate was 31/44 and the live birth rate was 25/44. There was no difference in treatment outcomes between telehealth compared to controls. 73% of patients were highly satisfied with telehealth. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth can improve access to ART in underserved areas and results in high patient satisfaction. Reproductive health providers could consider telehealth as a safe and efficacious tool to ameliorate geographic disparities. Springer US 2021-01-14 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7808701/ /pubmed/33447948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02027-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Assisted Reproduction Technologies Mikhael, Sasha Gaidis, Anna Gavrilova-Jordan, Larisa Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap |
title | Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap |
title_full | Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap |
title_fullStr | Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap |
title_full_unstemmed | Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap |
title_short | Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap |
title_sort | regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap |
topic | Assisted Reproduction Technologies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02027-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mikhaelsasha regionaldisparitiesinaccesstoassistedreproductivetechnologyassessmentofpatientsatisfactionwhenemployingmoderntechnologytoclosethegap AT gaidisanna regionaldisparitiesinaccesstoassistedreproductivetechnologyassessmentofpatientsatisfactionwhenemployingmoderntechnologytoclosethegap AT gavrilovajordanlarisa regionaldisparitiesinaccesstoassistedreproductivetechnologyassessmentofpatientsatisfactionwhenemployingmoderntechnologytoclosethegap |