Cargando…

Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap

PURPOSE: Geographic disparities for assisted reproductive technology (ART) continue to exist. Travel cost and time off work may create additional barriers for patients living remotely. Implementing telehealth can alleviate these barriers by reducing office visits. The aim of this study was to evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mikhael, Sasha, Gaidis, Anna, Gavrilova-Jordan, Larisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02027-7
_version_ 1783636957662806016
author Mikhael, Sasha
Gaidis, Anna
Gavrilova-Jordan, Larisa
author_facet Mikhael, Sasha
Gaidis, Anna
Gavrilova-Jordan, Larisa
author_sort Mikhael, Sasha
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Geographic disparities for assisted reproductive technology (ART) continue to exist. Travel cost and time off work may create additional barriers for patients living remotely. Implementing telehealth can alleviate these barriers by reducing office visits. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction with telehealth during ART. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey and retrospective cohort study. Patients living remotely who underwent ART utilizing telehealth between 2015 and 2018 at a single institution were selected for the telehealth group. The non-telehealth control group included randomly selected patients who underwent IVF at the same institution between 2015 and 2018. Demographic variables and treatment outcomes were obtained for both groups. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was distributed to telehealth patients. Statistical analysis using χ(2) test was performed to compare ART outcomes between both groups. RESULTS: Ninety-seven control and 97 telehealth patients were included. For telehealth patients, the mean number of office visits and distance traveled was 2.9 (± 0.8 SD) and 143.1 miles (± 49.2 SD) respectively. 58.8% of patients completed the survey. 44/57 participants had an oocyte retrieval and 42/44 underwent embryo transfer. For those who completed the survey, the clinical pregnancy rate was 31/44 and the live birth rate was 25/44. There was no difference in treatment outcomes between telehealth compared to controls. 73% of patients were highly satisfied with telehealth. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth can improve access to ART in underserved areas and results in high patient satisfaction. Reproductive health providers could consider telehealth as a safe and efficacious tool to ameliorate geographic disparities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7808701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78087012021-01-15 Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap Mikhael, Sasha Gaidis, Anna Gavrilova-Jordan, Larisa J Assist Reprod Genet Assisted Reproduction Technologies PURPOSE: Geographic disparities for assisted reproductive technology (ART) continue to exist. Travel cost and time off work may create additional barriers for patients living remotely. Implementing telehealth can alleviate these barriers by reducing office visits. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction with telehealth during ART. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey and retrospective cohort study. Patients living remotely who underwent ART utilizing telehealth between 2015 and 2018 at a single institution were selected for the telehealth group. The non-telehealth control group included randomly selected patients who underwent IVF at the same institution between 2015 and 2018. Demographic variables and treatment outcomes were obtained for both groups. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was distributed to telehealth patients. Statistical analysis using χ(2) test was performed to compare ART outcomes between both groups. RESULTS: Ninety-seven control and 97 telehealth patients were included. For telehealth patients, the mean number of office visits and distance traveled was 2.9 (± 0.8 SD) and 143.1 miles (± 49.2 SD) respectively. 58.8% of patients completed the survey. 44/57 participants had an oocyte retrieval and 42/44 underwent embryo transfer. For those who completed the survey, the clinical pregnancy rate was 31/44 and the live birth rate was 25/44. There was no difference in treatment outcomes between telehealth compared to controls. 73% of patients were highly satisfied with telehealth. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth can improve access to ART in underserved areas and results in high patient satisfaction. Reproductive health providers could consider telehealth as a safe and efficacious tool to ameliorate geographic disparities. Springer US 2021-01-14 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7808701/ /pubmed/33447948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02027-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Assisted Reproduction Technologies
Mikhael, Sasha
Gaidis, Anna
Gavrilova-Jordan, Larisa
Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap
title Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap
title_full Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap
title_fullStr Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap
title_full_unstemmed Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap
title_short Regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap
title_sort regional disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology: assessment of patient satisfaction when employing modern technology to close the gap
topic Assisted Reproduction Technologies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02027-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mikhaelsasha regionaldisparitiesinaccesstoassistedreproductivetechnologyassessmentofpatientsatisfactionwhenemployingmoderntechnologytoclosethegap
AT gaidisanna regionaldisparitiesinaccesstoassistedreproductivetechnologyassessmentofpatientsatisfactionwhenemployingmoderntechnologytoclosethegap
AT gavrilovajordanlarisa regionaldisparitiesinaccesstoassistedreproductivetechnologyassessmentofpatientsatisfactionwhenemployingmoderntechnologytoclosethegap