Cargando…
Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Technique. Does It Matter? Weight Loss and Weight Regain 5 Years After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
PURPOSE: The gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) can be constructed by hand sewn (HSA), linear (LSA) and circular (CSA) stapler technique. They are all considered safe; however, it is not known which the best technique is. Short-term follow-up suggest no difference...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04932-3 |
_version_ | 1783637017418006528 |
---|---|
author | Fehervari, Matyas Alyaqout, Khaled Lairy, Ali Khwaja, Haris Bonanomi, Gianluca Efthimiou, Evangelos |
author_facet | Fehervari, Matyas Alyaqout, Khaled Lairy, Ali Khwaja, Haris Bonanomi, Gianluca Efthimiou, Evangelos |
author_sort | Fehervari, Matyas |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) can be constructed by hand sewn (HSA), linear (LSA) and circular (CSA) stapler technique. They are all considered safe; however, it is not known which the best technique is. Short-term follow-up suggest no difference in weight loss or weight regain between them. However, there is no information on these parameters in the long term. Theatre time and cost are other important factors defining the best way to form gastrojejunostomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective longitudinal cohort study consecutive patients following primary LRYGB were recruited to a bariatric database in a tertiary care centre. Anastomotic technique, diameter, the length of operations and associated costs, weight loss and weight regain were recorded. Patients were followed up for 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 385 patients with an initial body mass index of 47.1 kg/m(2) (35–68) were enrolled to this study. This decreased to 33.3 kg/m(2) (21–54 kg/m(2)) after 5 years. There was no difference in %TWL after 3 years, P = 0.296, or 5 years, P = 0.187, between the techniques. The number of patients with weight regain was not different after 3 years, P = 0.224, or 5 years, P = 0.795. All techniques had similar operative time. CSA has a higher material cost. Early anastomotic stricture was more common following HSA; however, the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: Mid-term weight loss and weight regain are not related to anastomotic technique, and there is no difference in operative time associated to them. Circular stapler technique has a higher material cost due to the additional stapler. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7808971 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78089712021-01-21 Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Technique. Does It Matter? Weight Loss and Weight Regain 5 Years After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Fehervari, Matyas Alyaqout, Khaled Lairy, Ali Khwaja, Haris Bonanomi, Gianluca Efthimiou, Evangelos Obes Surg Original Contributions PURPOSE: The gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) can be constructed by hand sewn (HSA), linear (LSA) and circular (CSA) stapler technique. They are all considered safe; however, it is not known which the best technique is. Short-term follow-up suggest no difference in weight loss or weight regain between them. However, there is no information on these parameters in the long term. Theatre time and cost are other important factors defining the best way to form gastrojejunostomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective longitudinal cohort study consecutive patients following primary LRYGB were recruited to a bariatric database in a tertiary care centre. Anastomotic technique, diameter, the length of operations and associated costs, weight loss and weight regain were recorded. Patients were followed up for 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 385 patients with an initial body mass index of 47.1 kg/m(2) (35–68) were enrolled to this study. This decreased to 33.3 kg/m(2) (21–54 kg/m(2)) after 5 years. There was no difference in %TWL after 3 years, P = 0.296, or 5 years, P = 0.187, between the techniques. The number of patients with weight regain was not different after 3 years, P = 0.224, or 5 years, P = 0.795. All techniques had similar operative time. CSA has a higher material cost. Early anastomotic stricture was more common following HSA; however, the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: Mid-term weight loss and weight regain are not related to anastomotic technique, and there is no difference in operative time associated to them. Circular stapler technique has a higher material cost due to the additional stapler. Springer US 2020-08-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7808971/ /pubmed/32845476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04932-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Contributions Fehervari, Matyas Alyaqout, Khaled Lairy, Ali Khwaja, Haris Bonanomi, Gianluca Efthimiou, Evangelos Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Technique. Does It Matter? Weight Loss and Weight Regain 5 Years After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass |
title | Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Technique. Does It Matter? Weight Loss and Weight Regain 5 Years After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass |
title_full | Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Technique. Does It Matter? Weight Loss and Weight Regain 5 Years After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass |
title_fullStr | Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Technique. Does It Matter? Weight Loss and Weight Regain 5 Years After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass |
title_full_unstemmed | Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Technique. Does It Matter? Weight Loss and Weight Regain 5 Years After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass |
title_short | Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Technique. Does It Matter? Weight Loss and Weight Regain 5 Years After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass |
title_sort | gastrojejunal anastomotic technique. does it matter? weight loss and weight regain 5 years after laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass |
topic | Original Contributions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04932-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fehervarimatyas gastrojejunalanastomotictechniquedoesitmatterweightlossandweightregain5yearsafterlaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT alyaqoutkhaled gastrojejunalanastomotictechniquedoesitmatterweightlossandweightregain5yearsafterlaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT lairyali gastrojejunalanastomotictechniquedoesitmatterweightlossandweightregain5yearsafterlaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT khwajaharis gastrojejunalanastomotictechniquedoesitmatterweightlossandweightregain5yearsafterlaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT bonanomigianluca gastrojejunalanastomotictechniquedoesitmatterweightlossandweightregain5yearsafterlaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT efthimiouevangelos gastrojejunalanastomotictechniquedoesitmatterweightlossandweightregain5yearsafterlaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass |