Cargando…
A comparative analysis of different biofluids towards ovarian cancer diagnosis using Raman microspectroscopy
Biofluids, such as blood plasma or serum, are currently being evaluated for cancer detection using vibrational spectroscopy. These fluids contain information of key biomolecules, such as proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and nucleic acids, that comprise spectrochemical patterns to differentiate sample...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33242117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-03045-1 |
_version_ | 1783637017667567616 |
---|---|
author | Giamougiannis, Panagiotis Morais, Camilo L. M. Grabowska, Rita Ashton, Katherine M. Wood, Nicholas J. Martin-Hirsch, Pierre L. Martin, Francis L. |
author_facet | Giamougiannis, Panagiotis Morais, Camilo L. M. Grabowska, Rita Ashton, Katherine M. Wood, Nicholas J. Martin-Hirsch, Pierre L. Martin, Francis L. |
author_sort | Giamougiannis, Panagiotis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biofluids, such as blood plasma or serum, are currently being evaluated for cancer detection using vibrational spectroscopy. These fluids contain information of key biomolecules, such as proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and nucleic acids, that comprise spectrochemical patterns to differentiate samples. Raman is a water-free and practically non-destructive vibrational spectroscopy technique, capable of recording spectrochemical fingerprints of biofluids with minimum or no sample preparation. Herein, we compare the performance of these two common biofluids (blood plasma and serum) together with ascitic fluid, towards ovarian cancer detection using Raman microspectroscopy. Samples from thirty-eight patients were analysed (n = 18 ovarian cancer patients, n = 20 benign controls) through different spectral pre-processing and discriminant analysis techniques. Ascitic fluid provided the best class separation in both unsupervised and supervised discrimination approaches, where classification accuracies, sensitivities and specificities above 80% were obtained, in comparison to 60–73% with plasma or serum. Ascitic fluid appears to be rich in collagen information responsible for distinguishing ovarian cancer samples, where collagen-signalling bands at 1004 cm(−1) (phenylalanine), 1334 cm(−1) (CH(3)CH(2) wagging vibration), 1448 cm(−1) (CH(2) deformation) and 1657 cm(−1) (Amide I) exhibited high statistical significance for class differentiation (P < 0.001). The efficacy of vibrational spectroscopy, in particular Raman spectroscopy, combined with ascitic fluid analysis, suggests a potential diagnostic method for ovarian cancer. [Figure: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7808972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78089722021-01-21 A comparative analysis of different biofluids towards ovarian cancer diagnosis using Raman microspectroscopy Giamougiannis, Panagiotis Morais, Camilo L. M. Grabowska, Rita Ashton, Katherine M. Wood, Nicholas J. Martin-Hirsch, Pierre L. Martin, Francis L. Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper Biofluids, such as blood plasma or serum, are currently being evaluated for cancer detection using vibrational spectroscopy. These fluids contain information of key biomolecules, such as proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and nucleic acids, that comprise spectrochemical patterns to differentiate samples. Raman is a water-free and practically non-destructive vibrational spectroscopy technique, capable of recording spectrochemical fingerprints of biofluids with minimum or no sample preparation. Herein, we compare the performance of these two common biofluids (blood plasma and serum) together with ascitic fluid, towards ovarian cancer detection using Raman microspectroscopy. Samples from thirty-eight patients were analysed (n = 18 ovarian cancer patients, n = 20 benign controls) through different spectral pre-processing and discriminant analysis techniques. Ascitic fluid provided the best class separation in both unsupervised and supervised discrimination approaches, where classification accuracies, sensitivities and specificities above 80% were obtained, in comparison to 60–73% with plasma or serum. Ascitic fluid appears to be rich in collagen information responsible for distinguishing ovarian cancer samples, where collagen-signalling bands at 1004 cm(−1) (phenylalanine), 1334 cm(−1) (CH(3)CH(2) wagging vibration), 1448 cm(−1) (CH(2) deformation) and 1657 cm(−1) (Amide I) exhibited high statistical significance for class differentiation (P < 0.001). The efficacy of vibrational spectroscopy, in particular Raman spectroscopy, combined with ascitic fluid analysis, suggests a potential diagnostic method for ovarian cancer. [Figure: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7808972/ /pubmed/33242117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-03045-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Giamougiannis, Panagiotis Morais, Camilo L. M. Grabowska, Rita Ashton, Katherine M. Wood, Nicholas J. Martin-Hirsch, Pierre L. Martin, Francis L. A comparative analysis of different biofluids towards ovarian cancer diagnosis using Raman microspectroscopy |
title | A comparative analysis of different biofluids towards ovarian cancer diagnosis using Raman microspectroscopy |
title_full | A comparative analysis of different biofluids towards ovarian cancer diagnosis using Raman microspectroscopy |
title_fullStr | A comparative analysis of different biofluids towards ovarian cancer diagnosis using Raman microspectroscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative analysis of different biofluids towards ovarian cancer diagnosis using Raman microspectroscopy |
title_short | A comparative analysis of different biofluids towards ovarian cancer diagnosis using Raman microspectroscopy |
title_sort | comparative analysis of different biofluids towards ovarian cancer diagnosis using raman microspectroscopy |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7808972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33242117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-03045-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giamougiannispanagiotis acomparativeanalysisofdifferentbiofluidstowardsovariancancerdiagnosisusingramanmicrospectroscopy AT moraiscamilolm acomparativeanalysisofdifferentbiofluidstowardsovariancancerdiagnosisusingramanmicrospectroscopy AT grabowskarita acomparativeanalysisofdifferentbiofluidstowardsovariancancerdiagnosisusingramanmicrospectroscopy AT ashtonkatherinem acomparativeanalysisofdifferentbiofluidstowardsovariancancerdiagnosisusingramanmicrospectroscopy AT woodnicholasj acomparativeanalysisofdifferentbiofluidstowardsovariancancerdiagnosisusingramanmicrospectroscopy AT martinhirschpierrel acomparativeanalysisofdifferentbiofluidstowardsovariancancerdiagnosisusingramanmicrospectroscopy AT martinfrancisl acomparativeanalysisofdifferentbiofluidstowardsovariancancerdiagnosisusingramanmicrospectroscopy AT giamougiannispanagiotis comparativeanalysisofdifferentbiofluidstowardsovariancancerdiagnosisusingramanmicrospectroscopy AT moraiscamilolm comparativeanalysisofdifferentbiofluidstowardsovariancancerdiagnosisusingramanmicrospectroscopy AT grabowskarita comparativeanalysisofdifferentbiofluidstowardsovariancancerdiagnosisusingramanmicrospectroscopy AT ashtonkatherinem comparativeanalysisofdifferentbiofluidstowardsovariancancerdiagnosisusingramanmicrospectroscopy AT woodnicholasj comparativeanalysisofdifferentbiofluidstowardsovariancancerdiagnosisusingramanmicrospectroscopy AT martinhirschpierrel comparativeanalysisofdifferentbiofluidstowardsovariancancerdiagnosisusingramanmicrospectroscopy AT martinfrancisl comparativeanalysisofdifferentbiofluidstowardsovariancancerdiagnosisusingramanmicrospectroscopy |