Cargando…

Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education

INTRODUCTION: Programmatic assessment was introduced as an approach to design assessment programmes with the aim to simultaneously optimize the decision-making and learning function of assessment. An integrative review was conducted to review and synthesize results from studies investigating program...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schut, Suzanne, Maggio, Lauren A., Heeneman, Sylvia, van Tartwijk, Jan, van der Vleuten, Cees, Driessen, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33085060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00625-w
_version_ 1783637043920764928
author Schut, Suzanne
Maggio, Lauren A.
Heeneman, Sylvia
van Tartwijk, Jan
van der Vleuten, Cees
Driessen, Erik
author_facet Schut, Suzanne
Maggio, Lauren A.
Heeneman, Sylvia
van Tartwijk, Jan
van der Vleuten, Cees
Driessen, Erik
author_sort Schut, Suzanne
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Programmatic assessment was introduced as an approach to design assessment programmes with the aim to simultaneously optimize the decision-making and learning function of assessment. An integrative review was conducted to review and synthesize results from studies investigating programmatic assessment in health care professions education in practice. METHODS: The authors systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and ERIC to identify studies published since 2005 that reported empirical data on programmatic assessment. Characteristics of the included studies were extracted and synthesized, using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were included, which used quantitative methods (n = 10), qualitative methods (n = 12) or mixed methods (n = 5). Most studies were conducted in clinical settings (77.8%). Programmatic assessment was found to enable meaningful triangulation for robust decision-making and used as a catalyst for learning. However, several problems were identified, including overload in assessment information and the associated workload, counterproductive impact of using strict requirements and summative signals, lack of a shared understanding of the nature and purpose of programmatic assessment, and lack of supportive interpersonal relationships. Thematic analysis revealed that the success and challenges of programmatic assessment were best understood by the interplay between quantity and quality of assessment information, and the influence of social and personal aspects on assessment perceptions. CONCLUSION: Although some of the evidence may seem compelling to support the effectiveness of programmatic assessment in practice, tensions will emerge when simultaneously stimulating the development of competencies and assessing its result. The identified factors and inferred strategies provide guidance for navigating these tensions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-020-00625-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7809087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78090872021-01-21 Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education Schut, Suzanne Maggio, Lauren A. Heeneman, Sylvia van Tartwijk, Jan van der Vleuten, Cees Driessen, Erik Perspect Med Educ Review Article INTRODUCTION: Programmatic assessment was introduced as an approach to design assessment programmes with the aim to simultaneously optimize the decision-making and learning function of assessment. An integrative review was conducted to review and synthesize results from studies investigating programmatic assessment in health care professions education in practice. METHODS: The authors systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and ERIC to identify studies published since 2005 that reported empirical data on programmatic assessment. Characteristics of the included studies were extracted and synthesized, using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were included, which used quantitative methods (n = 10), qualitative methods (n = 12) or mixed methods (n = 5). Most studies were conducted in clinical settings (77.8%). Programmatic assessment was found to enable meaningful triangulation for robust decision-making and used as a catalyst for learning. However, several problems were identified, including overload in assessment information and the associated workload, counterproductive impact of using strict requirements and summative signals, lack of a shared understanding of the nature and purpose of programmatic assessment, and lack of supportive interpersonal relationships. Thematic analysis revealed that the success and challenges of programmatic assessment were best understood by the interplay between quantity and quality of assessment information, and the influence of social and personal aspects on assessment perceptions. CONCLUSION: Although some of the evidence may seem compelling to support the effectiveness of programmatic assessment in practice, tensions will emerge when simultaneously stimulating the development of competencies and assessing its result. The identified factors and inferred strategies provide guidance for navigating these tensions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-020-00625-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2020-10-21 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7809087/ /pubmed/33085060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00625-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Schut, Suzanne
Maggio, Lauren A.
Heeneman, Sylvia
van Tartwijk, Jan
van der Vleuten, Cees
Driessen, Erik
Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education
title Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education
title_full Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education
title_fullStr Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education
title_full_unstemmed Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education
title_short Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education
title_sort where the rubber meets the road — an integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33085060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00625-w
work_keys_str_mv AT schutsuzanne wheretherubbermeetstheroadanintegrativereviewofprogrammaticassessmentinhealthcareprofessionseducation
AT maggiolaurena wheretherubbermeetstheroadanintegrativereviewofprogrammaticassessmentinhealthcareprofessionseducation
AT heenemansylvia wheretherubbermeetstheroadanintegrativereviewofprogrammaticassessmentinhealthcareprofessionseducation
AT vantartwijkjan wheretherubbermeetstheroadanintegrativereviewofprogrammaticassessmentinhealthcareprofessionseducation
AT vandervleutencees wheretherubbermeetstheroadanintegrativereviewofprogrammaticassessmentinhealthcareprofessionseducation
AT driessenerik wheretherubbermeetstheroadanintegrativereviewofprogrammaticassessmentinhealthcareprofessionseducation