Cargando…
Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education
INTRODUCTION: Programmatic assessment was introduced as an approach to design assessment programmes with the aim to simultaneously optimize the decision-making and learning function of assessment. An integrative review was conducted to review and synthesize results from studies investigating program...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33085060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00625-w |
_version_ | 1783637043920764928 |
---|---|
author | Schut, Suzanne Maggio, Lauren A. Heeneman, Sylvia van Tartwijk, Jan van der Vleuten, Cees Driessen, Erik |
author_facet | Schut, Suzanne Maggio, Lauren A. Heeneman, Sylvia van Tartwijk, Jan van der Vleuten, Cees Driessen, Erik |
author_sort | Schut, Suzanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Programmatic assessment was introduced as an approach to design assessment programmes with the aim to simultaneously optimize the decision-making and learning function of assessment. An integrative review was conducted to review and synthesize results from studies investigating programmatic assessment in health care professions education in practice. METHODS: The authors systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and ERIC to identify studies published since 2005 that reported empirical data on programmatic assessment. Characteristics of the included studies were extracted and synthesized, using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were included, which used quantitative methods (n = 10), qualitative methods (n = 12) or mixed methods (n = 5). Most studies were conducted in clinical settings (77.8%). Programmatic assessment was found to enable meaningful triangulation for robust decision-making and used as a catalyst for learning. However, several problems were identified, including overload in assessment information and the associated workload, counterproductive impact of using strict requirements and summative signals, lack of a shared understanding of the nature and purpose of programmatic assessment, and lack of supportive interpersonal relationships. Thematic analysis revealed that the success and challenges of programmatic assessment were best understood by the interplay between quantity and quality of assessment information, and the influence of social and personal aspects on assessment perceptions. CONCLUSION: Although some of the evidence may seem compelling to support the effectiveness of programmatic assessment in practice, tensions will emerge when simultaneously stimulating the development of competencies and assessing its result. The identified factors and inferred strategies provide guidance for navigating these tensions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-020-00625-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7809087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78090872021-01-21 Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education Schut, Suzanne Maggio, Lauren A. Heeneman, Sylvia van Tartwijk, Jan van der Vleuten, Cees Driessen, Erik Perspect Med Educ Review Article INTRODUCTION: Programmatic assessment was introduced as an approach to design assessment programmes with the aim to simultaneously optimize the decision-making and learning function of assessment. An integrative review was conducted to review and synthesize results from studies investigating programmatic assessment in health care professions education in practice. METHODS: The authors systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and ERIC to identify studies published since 2005 that reported empirical data on programmatic assessment. Characteristics of the included studies were extracted and synthesized, using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were included, which used quantitative methods (n = 10), qualitative methods (n = 12) or mixed methods (n = 5). Most studies were conducted in clinical settings (77.8%). Programmatic assessment was found to enable meaningful triangulation for robust decision-making and used as a catalyst for learning. However, several problems were identified, including overload in assessment information and the associated workload, counterproductive impact of using strict requirements and summative signals, lack of a shared understanding of the nature and purpose of programmatic assessment, and lack of supportive interpersonal relationships. Thematic analysis revealed that the success and challenges of programmatic assessment were best understood by the interplay between quantity and quality of assessment information, and the influence of social and personal aspects on assessment perceptions. CONCLUSION: Although some of the evidence may seem compelling to support the effectiveness of programmatic assessment in practice, tensions will emerge when simultaneously stimulating the development of competencies and assessing its result. The identified factors and inferred strategies provide guidance for navigating these tensions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-020-00625-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2020-10-21 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7809087/ /pubmed/33085060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00625-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Schut, Suzanne Maggio, Lauren A. Heeneman, Sylvia van Tartwijk, Jan van der Vleuten, Cees Driessen, Erik Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education |
title | Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education |
title_full | Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education |
title_fullStr | Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education |
title_full_unstemmed | Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education |
title_short | Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education |
title_sort | where the rubber meets the road — an integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33085060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00625-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schutsuzanne wheretherubbermeetstheroadanintegrativereviewofprogrammaticassessmentinhealthcareprofessionseducation AT maggiolaurena wheretherubbermeetstheroadanintegrativereviewofprogrammaticassessmentinhealthcareprofessionseducation AT heenemansylvia wheretherubbermeetstheroadanintegrativereviewofprogrammaticassessmentinhealthcareprofessionseducation AT vantartwijkjan wheretherubbermeetstheroadanintegrativereviewofprogrammaticassessmentinhealthcareprofessionseducation AT vandervleutencees wheretherubbermeetstheroadanintegrativereviewofprogrammaticassessmentinhealthcareprofessionseducation AT driessenerik wheretherubbermeetstheroadanintegrativereviewofprogrammaticassessmentinhealthcareprofessionseducation |