Cargando…

Test–retest reliability of laser evoked pain perception and fMRI BOLD responses

Pain perception is a subjective experience and highly variable across time. Brain responses evoked by nociceptive stimuli are highly associated with pain perception and also showed considerable variability. To date, the test–retest reliability of laser-evoked pain perception and its associated brain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bi, Yanzhi, Hou, Xin, Zhong, Jiahui, Hu, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79196-z
_version_ 1783637050440810496
author Bi, Yanzhi
Hou, Xin
Zhong, Jiahui
Hu, Li
author_facet Bi, Yanzhi
Hou, Xin
Zhong, Jiahui
Hu, Li
author_sort Bi, Yanzhi
collection PubMed
description Pain perception is a subjective experience and highly variable across time. Brain responses evoked by nociceptive stimuli are highly associated with pain perception and also showed considerable variability. To date, the test–retest reliability of laser-evoked pain perception and its associated brain responses across sessions remain unclear. Here, an experiment with a within-subject repeated-measures design was performed in 22 healthy volunteers. Radiant-heat laser stimuli were delivered on subjects’ left-hand dorsum in two sessions separated by 1–5 days. We observed that laser-evoked pain perception was significantly declined across sessions, coupled with decreased brain responses in the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1), right primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area, and middle cingulate cortex. Intraclass correlation coefficients between the two sessions showed “fair” to “moderate” test–retest reliability for pain perception and brain responses. Additionally, we observed lower resting-state brain activity in the right S1 and lower resting-state functional connectivity between right S1 and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the second session than the first session. Altogether, being possibly influenced by changes of baseline mental state, laser-evoked pain perception and brain responses showed considerable across-session variability. This phenomenon should be considered when designing experiments for laboratory studies and evaluating pain abnormalities in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7809116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78091162021-01-15 Test–retest reliability of laser evoked pain perception and fMRI BOLD responses Bi, Yanzhi Hou, Xin Zhong, Jiahui Hu, Li Sci Rep Article Pain perception is a subjective experience and highly variable across time. Brain responses evoked by nociceptive stimuli are highly associated with pain perception and also showed considerable variability. To date, the test–retest reliability of laser-evoked pain perception and its associated brain responses across sessions remain unclear. Here, an experiment with a within-subject repeated-measures design was performed in 22 healthy volunteers. Radiant-heat laser stimuli were delivered on subjects’ left-hand dorsum in two sessions separated by 1–5 days. We observed that laser-evoked pain perception was significantly declined across sessions, coupled with decreased brain responses in the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1), right primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area, and middle cingulate cortex. Intraclass correlation coefficients between the two sessions showed “fair” to “moderate” test–retest reliability for pain perception and brain responses. Additionally, we observed lower resting-state brain activity in the right S1 and lower resting-state functional connectivity between right S1 and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the second session than the first session. Altogether, being possibly influenced by changes of baseline mental state, laser-evoked pain perception and brain responses showed considerable across-session variability. This phenomenon should be considered when designing experiments for laboratory studies and evaluating pain abnormalities in clinical practice. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7809116/ /pubmed/33446726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79196-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Bi, Yanzhi
Hou, Xin
Zhong, Jiahui
Hu, Li
Test–retest reliability of laser evoked pain perception and fMRI BOLD responses
title Test–retest reliability of laser evoked pain perception and fMRI BOLD responses
title_full Test–retest reliability of laser evoked pain perception and fMRI BOLD responses
title_fullStr Test–retest reliability of laser evoked pain perception and fMRI BOLD responses
title_full_unstemmed Test–retest reliability of laser evoked pain perception and fMRI BOLD responses
title_short Test–retest reliability of laser evoked pain perception and fMRI BOLD responses
title_sort test–retest reliability of laser evoked pain perception and fmri bold responses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79196-z
work_keys_str_mv AT biyanzhi testretestreliabilityoflaserevokedpainperceptionandfmriboldresponses
AT houxin testretestreliabilityoflaserevokedpainperceptionandfmriboldresponses
AT zhongjiahui testretestreliabilityoflaserevokedpainperceptionandfmriboldresponses
AT huli testretestreliabilityoflaserevokedpainperceptionandfmriboldresponses