Cargando…

The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: A fracture liaison service (FLS) is a coordinated system of care that streamlines osteoporosis management in the orthopaedic setting and can serve as an effective form of secondary preventative care in these patients. The present work reviews the available evidence regarding the impact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barton, David W., Piple, Amit S., Smith, C. Taylor, Moskal, Sterling A., Carmouche, Jonathan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459320979978
_version_ 1783637092158406656
author Barton, David W.
Piple, Amit S.
Smith, C. Taylor
Moskal, Sterling A.
Carmouche, Jonathan J.
author_facet Barton, David W.
Piple, Amit S.
Smith, C. Taylor
Moskal, Sterling A.
Carmouche, Jonathan J.
author_sort Barton, David W.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A fracture liaison service (FLS) is a coordinated system of care that streamlines osteoporosis management in the orthopaedic setting and can serve as an effective form of secondary preventative care in these patients. The present work reviews the available evidence regarding the impact of fracture liaison services on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The literature was reviewed for studies reporting changes in the rates of bone mineral density scanning (DXA), antiresorptive therapy, new minimum trauma fractures, and mortality between cohorts with access to an FLS or not. Studies including intention to treat level data were retained. A Medline search for “fracture liaison” OR “secondary fracture prevention” produced 146 results, 98 were excluded based on the abstract, 38 were excluded based on full-text review. Ten level III studies encompassing 48,045 patients were included, of which 5 studies encompassing 7,086 were analyzed. Odds-ratios for DXA and anti-osteoporosis pharmacotherapy rates were calculated from data. Fixed and random effects analyses were performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Four studies reported, on average, a 6-fold improvement in DXA scanning rates (Figure 1). Six studies reported, on average, a 3-fold improvement in antiresorptive therapy rates (Figure 2). Four large studies reported significant reductions in the rate of new fractures using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models at 12 months (HR = 0.84, 0.95), 24 months (HR = 0.44, 0.65), and 36 months (HR = 0.67). Five large studies reported mortality improvements using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models at 12 months (HR = 0.88, 0.84, 0.81) and 24 months (HR = 0.65, 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that fracture liaison services improve rates of DXA scanning and antiresorptive therapy as well as reductions in the rates of new fractures and mortality among patients seen following minimum trauma fractures across many time points.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7809296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78092962021-01-22 The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review Barton, David W. Piple, Amit S. Smith, C. Taylor Moskal, Sterling A. Carmouche, Jonathan J. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: A fracture liaison service (FLS) is a coordinated system of care that streamlines osteoporosis management in the orthopaedic setting and can serve as an effective form of secondary preventative care in these patients. The present work reviews the available evidence regarding the impact of fracture liaison services on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The literature was reviewed for studies reporting changes in the rates of bone mineral density scanning (DXA), antiresorptive therapy, new minimum trauma fractures, and mortality between cohorts with access to an FLS or not. Studies including intention to treat level data were retained. A Medline search for “fracture liaison” OR “secondary fracture prevention” produced 146 results, 98 were excluded based on the abstract, 38 were excluded based on full-text review. Ten level III studies encompassing 48,045 patients were included, of which 5 studies encompassing 7,086 were analyzed. Odds-ratios for DXA and anti-osteoporosis pharmacotherapy rates were calculated from data. Fixed and random effects analyses were performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Four studies reported, on average, a 6-fold improvement in DXA scanning rates (Figure 1). Six studies reported, on average, a 3-fold improvement in antiresorptive therapy rates (Figure 2). Four large studies reported significant reductions in the rate of new fractures using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models at 12 months (HR = 0.84, 0.95), 24 months (HR = 0.44, 0.65), and 36 months (HR = 0.67). Five large studies reported mortality improvements using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models at 12 months (HR = 0.88, 0.84, 0.81) and 24 months (HR = 0.65, 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that fracture liaison services improve rates of DXA scanning and antiresorptive therapy as well as reductions in the rates of new fractures and mortality among patients seen following minimum trauma fractures across many time points. SAGE Publications 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7809296/ /pubmed/33489430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459320979978 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Barton, David W.
Piple, Amit S.
Smith, C. Taylor
Moskal, Sterling A.
Carmouche, Jonathan J.
The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review
title The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review
title_full The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review
title_short The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review
title_sort clinical impact of fracture liaison services: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459320979978
work_keys_str_mv AT bartondavidw theclinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview
AT pipleamits theclinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview
AT smithctaylor theclinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview
AT moskalsterlinga theclinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview
AT carmouchejonathanj theclinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview
AT bartondavidw clinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview
AT pipleamits clinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview
AT smithctaylor clinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview
AT moskalsterlinga clinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview
AT carmouchejonathanj clinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview