Cargando…
The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review
INTRODUCTION: A fracture liaison service (FLS) is a coordinated system of care that streamlines osteoporosis management in the orthopaedic setting and can serve as an effective form of secondary preventative care in these patients. The present work reviews the available evidence regarding the impact...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459320979978 |
_version_ | 1783637092158406656 |
---|---|
author | Barton, David W. Piple, Amit S. Smith, C. Taylor Moskal, Sterling A. Carmouche, Jonathan J. |
author_facet | Barton, David W. Piple, Amit S. Smith, C. Taylor Moskal, Sterling A. Carmouche, Jonathan J. |
author_sort | Barton, David W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: A fracture liaison service (FLS) is a coordinated system of care that streamlines osteoporosis management in the orthopaedic setting and can serve as an effective form of secondary preventative care in these patients. The present work reviews the available evidence regarding the impact of fracture liaison services on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The literature was reviewed for studies reporting changes in the rates of bone mineral density scanning (DXA), antiresorptive therapy, new minimum trauma fractures, and mortality between cohorts with access to an FLS or not. Studies including intention to treat level data were retained. A Medline search for “fracture liaison” OR “secondary fracture prevention” produced 146 results, 98 were excluded based on the abstract, 38 were excluded based on full-text review. Ten level III studies encompassing 48,045 patients were included, of which 5 studies encompassing 7,086 were analyzed. Odds-ratios for DXA and anti-osteoporosis pharmacotherapy rates were calculated from data. Fixed and random effects analyses were performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Four studies reported, on average, a 6-fold improvement in DXA scanning rates (Figure 1). Six studies reported, on average, a 3-fold improvement in antiresorptive therapy rates (Figure 2). Four large studies reported significant reductions in the rate of new fractures using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models at 12 months (HR = 0.84, 0.95), 24 months (HR = 0.44, 0.65), and 36 months (HR = 0.67). Five large studies reported mortality improvements using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models at 12 months (HR = 0.88, 0.84, 0.81) and 24 months (HR = 0.65, 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that fracture liaison services improve rates of DXA scanning and antiresorptive therapy as well as reductions in the rates of new fractures and mortality among patients seen following minimum trauma fractures across many time points. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7809296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78092962021-01-22 The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review Barton, David W. Piple, Amit S. Smith, C. Taylor Moskal, Sterling A. Carmouche, Jonathan J. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: A fracture liaison service (FLS) is a coordinated system of care that streamlines osteoporosis management in the orthopaedic setting and can serve as an effective form of secondary preventative care in these patients. The present work reviews the available evidence regarding the impact of fracture liaison services on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The literature was reviewed for studies reporting changes in the rates of bone mineral density scanning (DXA), antiresorptive therapy, new minimum trauma fractures, and mortality between cohorts with access to an FLS or not. Studies including intention to treat level data were retained. A Medline search for “fracture liaison” OR “secondary fracture prevention” produced 146 results, 98 were excluded based on the abstract, 38 were excluded based on full-text review. Ten level III studies encompassing 48,045 patients were included, of which 5 studies encompassing 7,086 were analyzed. Odds-ratios for DXA and anti-osteoporosis pharmacotherapy rates were calculated from data. Fixed and random effects analyses were performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Four studies reported, on average, a 6-fold improvement in DXA scanning rates (Figure 1). Six studies reported, on average, a 3-fold improvement in antiresorptive therapy rates (Figure 2). Four large studies reported significant reductions in the rate of new fractures using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models at 12 months (HR = 0.84, 0.95), 24 months (HR = 0.44, 0.65), and 36 months (HR = 0.67). Five large studies reported mortality improvements using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models at 12 months (HR = 0.88, 0.84, 0.81) and 24 months (HR = 0.65, 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that fracture liaison services improve rates of DXA scanning and antiresorptive therapy as well as reductions in the rates of new fractures and mortality among patients seen following minimum trauma fractures across many time points. SAGE Publications 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7809296/ /pubmed/33489430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459320979978 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Barton, David W. Piple, Amit S. Smith, C. Taylor Moskal, Sterling A. Carmouche, Jonathan J. The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review |
title | The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review |
title_full | The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review |
title_short | The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | clinical impact of fracture liaison services: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459320979978 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bartondavidw theclinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview AT pipleamits theclinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview AT smithctaylor theclinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview AT moskalsterlinga theclinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview AT carmouchejonathanj theclinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview AT bartondavidw clinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview AT pipleamits clinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview AT smithctaylor clinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview AT moskalsterlinga clinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview AT carmouchejonathanj clinicalimpactoffractureliaisonservicesasystematicreview |