Cargando…
Sleep reactivation did not boost suppression-induced forgetting
Sleep's role in memory consolidation is widely acknowledged, but its role in weakening memories is still debated. Memory weakening is evolutionary beneficial and makes an integral contribution to cognition. We sought evidence on whether sleep-based memory reactivation can facilitate memory supp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80671-w |
_version_ | 1783637133192331264 |
---|---|
author | Schechtman, Eitan Lampe, Anna Wilson, Brianna J. Kwon, Eunbi Anderson, Michael C. Paller, Ken A. |
author_facet | Schechtman, Eitan Lampe, Anna Wilson, Brianna J. Kwon, Eunbi Anderson, Michael C. Paller, Ken A. |
author_sort | Schechtman, Eitan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sleep's role in memory consolidation is widely acknowledged, but its role in weakening memories is still debated. Memory weakening is evolutionary beneficial and makes an integral contribution to cognition. We sought evidence on whether sleep-based memory reactivation can facilitate memory suppression. Participants learned pairs of associable words (e.g., DIET–CREAM) and were then exposed to hint words (e.g., DIET) and instructed to either recall (“think”) or suppress (“no-think”) the corresponding target words (e.g., CREAM). As expected, suppression impaired retention when tested immediately after a 90-min nap. To test if reactivation could selectively enhance memory suppression during sleep, we unobtrusively presented one of two sounds conveying suppression instructions during sleep, followed by hint words. Results showed that targeted memory reactivation did not enhance suppression-induced forgetting. Although not predicted, post-hoc analyses revealed that sleep cues strengthened memory, but only for suppressed pairs that were weakly encoded before sleep. The results leave open the question of whether memory suppression can be augmented during sleep, but suggest strategies for future studies manipulating memory suppression during sleep. Additionally, our findings support the notion that sleep reactivation is particularly beneficial for weakly encoded information, which may be prioritized for consolidation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7809483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78094832021-01-21 Sleep reactivation did not boost suppression-induced forgetting Schechtman, Eitan Lampe, Anna Wilson, Brianna J. Kwon, Eunbi Anderson, Michael C. Paller, Ken A. Sci Rep Article Sleep's role in memory consolidation is widely acknowledged, but its role in weakening memories is still debated. Memory weakening is evolutionary beneficial and makes an integral contribution to cognition. We sought evidence on whether sleep-based memory reactivation can facilitate memory suppression. Participants learned pairs of associable words (e.g., DIET–CREAM) and were then exposed to hint words (e.g., DIET) and instructed to either recall (“think”) or suppress (“no-think”) the corresponding target words (e.g., CREAM). As expected, suppression impaired retention when tested immediately after a 90-min nap. To test if reactivation could selectively enhance memory suppression during sleep, we unobtrusively presented one of two sounds conveying suppression instructions during sleep, followed by hint words. Results showed that targeted memory reactivation did not enhance suppression-induced forgetting. Although not predicted, post-hoc analyses revealed that sleep cues strengthened memory, but only for suppressed pairs that were weakly encoded before sleep. The results leave open the question of whether memory suppression can be augmented during sleep, but suggest strategies for future studies manipulating memory suppression during sleep. Additionally, our findings support the notion that sleep reactivation is particularly beneficial for weakly encoded information, which may be prioritized for consolidation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7809483/ /pubmed/33446812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80671-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Schechtman, Eitan Lampe, Anna Wilson, Brianna J. Kwon, Eunbi Anderson, Michael C. Paller, Ken A. Sleep reactivation did not boost suppression-induced forgetting |
title | Sleep reactivation did not boost suppression-induced forgetting |
title_full | Sleep reactivation did not boost suppression-induced forgetting |
title_fullStr | Sleep reactivation did not boost suppression-induced forgetting |
title_full_unstemmed | Sleep reactivation did not boost suppression-induced forgetting |
title_short | Sleep reactivation did not boost suppression-induced forgetting |
title_sort | sleep reactivation did not boost suppression-induced forgetting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80671-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schechtmaneitan sleepreactivationdidnotboostsuppressioninducedforgetting AT lampeanna sleepreactivationdidnotboostsuppressioninducedforgetting AT wilsonbriannaj sleepreactivationdidnotboostsuppressioninducedforgetting AT kwoneunbi sleepreactivationdidnotboostsuppressioninducedforgetting AT andersonmichaelc sleepreactivationdidnotboostsuppressioninducedforgetting AT pallerkena sleepreactivationdidnotboostsuppressioninducedforgetting |