Cargando…

Missing clinical trial data: the evidence gap in primary data for potential COVID-19 drugs

BACKGROUND: Several drugs are being repurposed for the treatment of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic based on in vitro or early clinical findings. As these drugs are being used in varied regimens and dosages, it is important to enable synthesis of existing safety data from clinical t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodgers, Florence, Pepperrell, Toby, Keestra, Sarai, Pilkington, Victoria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33451350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05024-y
_version_ 1783637158349766656
author Rodgers, Florence
Pepperrell, Toby
Keestra, Sarai
Pilkington, Victoria
author_facet Rodgers, Florence
Pepperrell, Toby
Keestra, Sarai
Pilkington, Victoria
author_sort Rodgers, Florence
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several drugs are being repurposed for the treatment of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic based on in vitro or early clinical findings. As these drugs are being used in varied regimens and dosages, it is important to enable synthesis of existing safety data from clinical trials. However, availability of safety information is limited by a lack of timely reporting of overall clinical trial results on public registries or through academic publication. We aimed to analyse the evidence gap in this data by conducting a rapid review of results posting on ClinicalTrials.gov and in academic publications to quantify the number of trials missing results for drugs potentially being repurposed for COVID-19. METHODS: ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for 19 drugs that have been identified as potential treatments for COVID-19. Relevant clinical trials for any prior indication were listed by identifier (NCT number) and checked for results and for timely result reporting (within 395 days of the primary completion date). Additionally, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to identify publications of results not listed on the registry. A second, blinded search of 10% of trials was conducted to assess reviewer concordance. RESULTS: Of 3754 completed trials, 1516 (40.4%) did not post results on ClinicalTrials.gov or in the academic literature. Tabular results were available on ClinicalTrials.gov for 1172 (31.2%) completed trials. A further 1066 (28.4%) had published results in the academic literature, but did not report results on ClinicalTrials.gov. Key drugs missing clinical trial results include hydroxychloroquine (37.0% completed trials unreported), favipiravir (77.8%) and lopinavir (40.5%). CONCLUSIONS: There is an important evidence gap for the safety of drugs being repurposed for COVID-19. This uncertainty could cause unnecessary additional morbidity and mortality during the pandemic. We recommend caution in experimental drug use for non-severe disease and urge clinical trial sponsors to report missing results retrospectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7809643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78096432021-01-15 Missing clinical trial data: the evidence gap in primary data for potential COVID-19 drugs Rodgers, Florence Pepperrell, Toby Keestra, Sarai Pilkington, Victoria Trials Research BACKGROUND: Several drugs are being repurposed for the treatment of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic based on in vitro or early clinical findings. As these drugs are being used in varied regimens and dosages, it is important to enable synthesis of existing safety data from clinical trials. However, availability of safety information is limited by a lack of timely reporting of overall clinical trial results on public registries or through academic publication. We aimed to analyse the evidence gap in this data by conducting a rapid review of results posting on ClinicalTrials.gov and in academic publications to quantify the number of trials missing results for drugs potentially being repurposed for COVID-19. METHODS: ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for 19 drugs that have been identified as potential treatments for COVID-19. Relevant clinical trials for any prior indication were listed by identifier (NCT number) and checked for results and for timely result reporting (within 395 days of the primary completion date). Additionally, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to identify publications of results not listed on the registry. A second, blinded search of 10% of trials was conducted to assess reviewer concordance. RESULTS: Of 3754 completed trials, 1516 (40.4%) did not post results on ClinicalTrials.gov or in the academic literature. Tabular results were available on ClinicalTrials.gov for 1172 (31.2%) completed trials. A further 1066 (28.4%) had published results in the academic literature, but did not report results on ClinicalTrials.gov. Key drugs missing clinical trial results include hydroxychloroquine (37.0% completed trials unreported), favipiravir (77.8%) and lopinavir (40.5%). CONCLUSIONS: There is an important evidence gap for the safety of drugs being repurposed for COVID-19. This uncertainty could cause unnecessary additional morbidity and mortality during the pandemic. We recommend caution in experimental drug use for non-severe disease and urge clinical trial sponsors to report missing results retrospectively. BioMed Central 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7809643/ /pubmed/33451350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05024-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Rodgers, Florence
Pepperrell, Toby
Keestra, Sarai
Pilkington, Victoria
Missing clinical trial data: the evidence gap in primary data for potential COVID-19 drugs
title Missing clinical trial data: the evidence gap in primary data for potential COVID-19 drugs
title_full Missing clinical trial data: the evidence gap in primary data for potential COVID-19 drugs
title_fullStr Missing clinical trial data: the evidence gap in primary data for potential COVID-19 drugs
title_full_unstemmed Missing clinical trial data: the evidence gap in primary data for potential COVID-19 drugs
title_short Missing clinical trial data: the evidence gap in primary data for potential COVID-19 drugs
title_sort missing clinical trial data: the evidence gap in primary data for potential covid-19 drugs
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33451350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05024-y
work_keys_str_mv AT rodgersflorence missingclinicaltrialdatatheevidencegapinprimarydataforpotentialcovid19drugs
AT pepperrelltoby missingclinicaltrialdatatheevidencegapinprimarydataforpotentialcovid19drugs
AT keestrasarai missingclinicaltrialdatatheevidencegapinprimarydataforpotentialcovid19drugs
AT pilkingtonvictoria missingclinicaltrialdatatheevidencegapinprimarydataforpotentialcovid19drugs