Cargando…
Why Death Need Not Be “Reasonably Foreseeable”—The Proposed Legislative Response to Truchon and Gladu v Attorney General (Canada) and Attorney General (Quebec) [2019] QCCS 3792
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33449313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10088-1 |
| _version_ | 1783637159305019392 |
|---|---|
| author | Okninski, Michaela Estelle |
| author_facet | Okninski, Michaela Estelle |
| author_sort | Okninski, Michaela Estelle |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-7809649 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Springer Singapore |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-78096492021-01-15 Why Death Need Not Be “Reasonably Foreseeable”—The Proposed Legislative Response to Truchon and Gladu v Attorney General (Canada) and Attorney General (Quebec) [2019] QCCS 3792 Okninski, Michaela Estelle J Bioeth Inq Recent Developments Springer Singapore 2021-01-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7809649/ /pubmed/33449313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10088-1 Text en © Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
| spellingShingle | Recent Developments Okninski, Michaela Estelle Why Death Need Not Be “Reasonably Foreseeable”—The Proposed Legislative Response to Truchon and Gladu v Attorney General (Canada) and Attorney General (Quebec) [2019] QCCS 3792 |
| title | Why Death Need Not Be “Reasonably Foreseeable”—The Proposed Legislative Response to Truchon and Gladu v Attorney General (Canada) and Attorney General (Quebec) [2019] QCCS 3792 |
| title_full | Why Death Need Not Be “Reasonably Foreseeable”—The Proposed Legislative Response to Truchon and Gladu v Attorney General (Canada) and Attorney General (Quebec) [2019] QCCS 3792 |
| title_fullStr | Why Death Need Not Be “Reasonably Foreseeable”—The Proposed Legislative Response to Truchon and Gladu v Attorney General (Canada) and Attorney General (Quebec) [2019] QCCS 3792 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Why Death Need Not Be “Reasonably Foreseeable”—The Proposed Legislative Response to Truchon and Gladu v Attorney General (Canada) and Attorney General (Quebec) [2019] QCCS 3792 |
| title_short | Why Death Need Not Be “Reasonably Foreseeable”—The Proposed Legislative Response to Truchon and Gladu v Attorney General (Canada) and Attorney General (Quebec) [2019] QCCS 3792 |
| title_sort | why death need not be “reasonably foreseeable”—the proposed legislative response to truchon and gladu v attorney general (canada) and attorney general (quebec) [2019] qccs 3792 |
| topic | Recent Developments |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33449313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10088-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT okninskimichaelaestelle whydeathneednotbereasonablyforeseeabletheproposedlegislativeresponsetotruchonandgladuvattorneygeneralcanadaandattorneygeneralquebec2019qccs3792 |