Cargando…
Why Death Need Not Be “Reasonably Foreseeable”—The Proposed Legislative Response to Truchon and Gladu v Attorney General (Canada) and Attorney General (Quebec) [2019] QCCS 3792
Autor principal: | Okninski, Michaela Estelle |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33449313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10088-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Attorney-General versus the Royal College of Physicians
Publicado: (1861) -
Voluntary Assisted Dying in Australia—Key Similarities and Points of Difference Concerning Eligibility Criteria in the Individual State Legislation
por: Okninski, Michaela Estelle
Publicado: (2023) -
Hon. Jewel P. Lightfoot, Attorney General of Texas
Publicado: (1909) -
Wills, Living Wills and Enduring Powers of Attorney
por: Laurence, D R
Publicado: (1995) -
Journalists, district attorneys and researchers: why IRBs should get in the middle
por: Chodos, Anna H, et al.
Publicado: (2015)