Cargando…
Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than N stage
BACKGROUND: Signet ring cell carcinoma is a rare type of oesophageal cancer, and we hypothesized that log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma. AIM: To explore a novel prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33511169 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i1.24 |
_version_ | 1783637160035876864 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Feng Gao, Shu-Geng Xue, Qi Tan, Feng-Wei Gao, Yu-Shun Mao, You-Sheng Wang, Da-Li Zhao, Jun Li, Yin Yu, Xiang-Yang Cheng, Hong Zhao, Chen-Guang Mu, Ju-Wei |
author_facet | Wang, Feng Gao, Shu-Geng Xue, Qi Tan, Feng-Wei Gao, Yu-Shun Mao, You-Sheng Wang, Da-Li Zhao, Jun Li, Yin Yu, Xiang-Yang Cheng, Hong Zhao, Chen-Guang Mu, Ju-Wei |
author_sort | Wang, Feng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Signet ring cell carcinoma is a rare type of oesophageal cancer, and we hypothesized that log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma. AIM: To explore a novel prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma by comparing two lymph node-related prognostic factors, log odds of positive LODDS and N stage. METHODS: A total of 259 cases of oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma after oesopha-gectomy were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2006 and 2016. The prognostic value of LODDS and N stage for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. The Akaike information criterion and Harrell’s C-index were used to assess the value of two prediction models based on lymph nodes. External validation was performed to further confirm the conclusion. RESULTS: The 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of all the cases were 41.3% and 27.0%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method showed that LODDS had a higher score of log rank chi-squared (OS: 46.162, CSS: 41.178) than N stage (OS: 36.215, CSS: 31.583). Univariate analyses showed that insurance, race, T stage, M stage, TNM stage, radiation therapy, N stage, and LODDS were potential prognostic factors for OS (P < 0.1). The multivariate Cox regression model showed that LODDS was an significant independent prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring carcinoma patients after surgical resection (P < 0.05), while N stage was not considered to be a significant prognostic factor (P = 0.122). Model 2 (LODDS) had a higher degree of discrimination and fit than Model 1 (N stage) (LODDS vs N stage, Harell’s C-index 0.673 vs 0.656, P < 0.001; Akaike information criterion 1688.824 vs 1697.519, P < 0.001). The results of external validation were consistent with those in the study cohort. CONCLUSION: LODDS is a superior prognostic factor to N stage for patients with oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma after oesophagectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7809653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78096532021-01-27 Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than N stage Wang, Feng Gao, Shu-Geng Xue, Qi Tan, Feng-Wei Gao, Yu-Shun Mao, You-Sheng Wang, Da-Li Zhao, Jun Li, Yin Yu, Xiang-Yang Cheng, Hong Zhao, Chen-Guang Mu, Ju-Wei World J Clin Cases Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: Signet ring cell carcinoma is a rare type of oesophageal cancer, and we hypothesized that log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma. AIM: To explore a novel prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma by comparing two lymph node-related prognostic factors, log odds of positive LODDS and N stage. METHODS: A total of 259 cases of oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma after oesopha-gectomy were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2006 and 2016. The prognostic value of LODDS and N stage for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. The Akaike information criterion and Harrell’s C-index were used to assess the value of two prediction models based on lymph nodes. External validation was performed to further confirm the conclusion. RESULTS: The 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of all the cases were 41.3% and 27.0%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method showed that LODDS had a higher score of log rank chi-squared (OS: 46.162, CSS: 41.178) than N stage (OS: 36.215, CSS: 31.583). Univariate analyses showed that insurance, race, T stage, M stage, TNM stage, radiation therapy, N stage, and LODDS were potential prognostic factors for OS (P < 0.1). The multivariate Cox regression model showed that LODDS was an significant independent prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring carcinoma patients after surgical resection (P < 0.05), while N stage was not considered to be a significant prognostic factor (P = 0.122). Model 2 (LODDS) had a higher degree of discrimination and fit than Model 1 (N stage) (LODDS vs N stage, Harell’s C-index 0.673 vs 0.656, P < 0.001; Akaike information criterion 1688.824 vs 1697.519, P < 0.001). The results of external validation were consistent with those in the study cohort. CONCLUSION: LODDS is a superior prognostic factor to N stage for patients with oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma after oesophagectomy. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-01-06 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7809653/ /pubmed/33511169 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i1.24 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Cohort Study Wang, Feng Gao, Shu-Geng Xue, Qi Tan, Feng-Wei Gao, Yu-Shun Mao, You-Sheng Wang, Da-Li Zhao, Jun Li, Yin Yu, Xiang-Yang Cheng, Hong Zhao, Chen-Guang Mu, Ju-Wei Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than N stage |
title | Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than N stage |
title_full | Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than N stage |
title_fullStr | Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than N stage |
title_full_unstemmed | Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than N stage |
title_short | Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than N stage |
title_sort | log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than n stage |
topic | Retrospective Cohort Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33511169 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i1.24 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangfeng logoddsofpositivelymphnodesisabetterprognosticfactorforoesophagealsignetringcellcarcinomathannstage AT gaoshugeng logoddsofpositivelymphnodesisabetterprognosticfactorforoesophagealsignetringcellcarcinomathannstage AT xueqi logoddsofpositivelymphnodesisabetterprognosticfactorforoesophagealsignetringcellcarcinomathannstage AT tanfengwei logoddsofpositivelymphnodesisabetterprognosticfactorforoesophagealsignetringcellcarcinomathannstage AT gaoyushun logoddsofpositivelymphnodesisabetterprognosticfactorforoesophagealsignetringcellcarcinomathannstage AT maoyousheng logoddsofpositivelymphnodesisabetterprognosticfactorforoesophagealsignetringcellcarcinomathannstage AT wangdali logoddsofpositivelymphnodesisabetterprognosticfactorforoesophagealsignetringcellcarcinomathannstage AT zhaojun logoddsofpositivelymphnodesisabetterprognosticfactorforoesophagealsignetringcellcarcinomathannstage AT liyin logoddsofpositivelymphnodesisabetterprognosticfactorforoesophagealsignetringcellcarcinomathannstage AT yuxiangyang logoddsofpositivelymphnodesisabetterprognosticfactorforoesophagealsignetringcellcarcinomathannstage AT chenghong logoddsofpositivelymphnodesisabetterprognosticfactorforoesophagealsignetringcellcarcinomathannstage AT zhaochenguang logoddsofpositivelymphnodesisabetterprognosticfactorforoesophagealsignetringcellcarcinomathannstage AT mujuwei logoddsofpositivelymphnodesisabetterprognosticfactorforoesophagealsignetringcellcarcinomathannstage |