Cargando…
Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling
BACKGROUND: Studies of the gut microbiome are becoming increasingly important. Such studies require stool collections that can be processed or frozen in a timely manner so as not to alter the microbial content. Due to the logistical difficulties of home-based stool collection, there has been a chall...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-02080-3 |
_version_ | 1783637194122985472 |
---|---|
author | Short, Meghan I. Hudson, Robert Besasie, Benjamin D. Reveles, Kelly R. Shah, Dimpy P. Nicholson, Susannah Johnson-Pais, Teresa L. Weldon, Korri Lai, Zhao Leach, Robin J. Fongang, Bernard Liss, Michael A. |
author_facet | Short, Meghan I. Hudson, Robert Besasie, Benjamin D. Reveles, Kelly R. Shah, Dimpy P. Nicholson, Susannah Johnson-Pais, Teresa L. Weldon, Korri Lai, Zhao Leach, Robin J. Fongang, Bernard Liss, Michael A. |
author_sort | Short, Meghan I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies of the gut microbiome are becoming increasingly important. Such studies require stool collections that can be processed or frozen in a timely manner so as not to alter the microbial content. Due to the logistical difficulties of home-based stool collection, there has been a challenge in selecting the appropriate sample collection technique and comparing results from different microbiome studies. Thus, we compared stool collection and two alternative clinic-based fecal microbiome collection techniques, including a newer glove-based collection method. RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 22 adult men from our prostate cancer screening cohort SABOR (San Antonio Biomarkers of Risk for prostate cancer) in San Antonio, TX, from 8/2018 to 4/2019. A rectal swab and glove tip sample were collected from each participant during a one-time visit to our clinics. A single stool sample was collected at the participant’s home. DNA was isolated from the fecal material and 16 s rRNA sequencing of the V1-V2 and V3-V4 regions was performed. We found the gut microbiome to be similar in richness and evenness, noting no differences in alpha diversity among the collection methods. The stool collection method, which remains the gold-standard method for the gut microbiome, proved to have different community composition compared to swab and glove tip techniques (p< 0.001) as measured by Bray-Curtis and unifrac distances. There were no significant differences in between the swab and glove tip samples with regard to beta diversity (p> 0.05). Despite differences between home-based stool and office-based fecal collection methods, we noted that the distance metrics for the three methods cluster by participant indicating within-person similarities. Additionally, no taxa differed among the methods in a Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis comparing all-against-all sampling methods. CONCLUSION: The glove tip method provides similar gut microbiome results as rectal swab and stool microbiome collection techniques. The addition of a new office-based collection technique could help easy and practical implementation of gut microbiome research studies and clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-020-02080-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7809826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78098262021-01-18 Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling Short, Meghan I. Hudson, Robert Besasie, Benjamin D. Reveles, Kelly R. Shah, Dimpy P. Nicholson, Susannah Johnson-Pais, Teresa L. Weldon, Korri Lai, Zhao Leach, Robin J. Fongang, Bernard Liss, Michael A. BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Studies of the gut microbiome are becoming increasingly important. Such studies require stool collections that can be processed or frozen in a timely manner so as not to alter the microbial content. Due to the logistical difficulties of home-based stool collection, there has been a challenge in selecting the appropriate sample collection technique and comparing results from different microbiome studies. Thus, we compared stool collection and two alternative clinic-based fecal microbiome collection techniques, including a newer glove-based collection method. RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 22 adult men from our prostate cancer screening cohort SABOR (San Antonio Biomarkers of Risk for prostate cancer) in San Antonio, TX, from 8/2018 to 4/2019. A rectal swab and glove tip sample were collected from each participant during a one-time visit to our clinics. A single stool sample was collected at the participant’s home. DNA was isolated from the fecal material and 16 s rRNA sequencing of the V1-V2 and V3-V4 regions was performed. We found the gut microbiome to be similar in richness and evenness, noting no differences in alpha diversity among the collection methods. The stool collection method, which remains the gold-standard method for the gut microbiome, proved to have different community composition compared to swab and glove tip techniques (p< 0.001) as measured by Bray-Curtis and unifrac distances. There were no significant differences in between the swab and glove tip samples with regard to beta diversity (p> 0.05). Despite differences between home-based stool and office-based fecal collection methods, we noted that the distance metrics for the three methods cluster by participant indicating within-person similarities. Additionally, no taxa differed among the methods in a Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis comparing all-against-all sampling methods. CONCLUSION: The glove tip method provides similar gut microbiome results as rectal swab and stool microbiome collection techniques. The addition of a new office-based collection technique could help easy and practical implementation of gut microbiome research studies and clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-020-02080-3. BioMed Central 2021-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7809826/ /pubmed/33446094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-02080-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Short, Meghan I. Hudson, Robert Besasie, Benjamin D. Reveles, Kelly R. Shah, Dimpy P. Nicholson, Susannah Johnson-Pais, Teresa L. Weldon, Korri Lai, Zhao Leach, Robin J. Fongang, Bernard Liss, Michael A. Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling |
title | Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling |
title_full | Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling |
title_fullStr | Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling |
title_short | Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling |
title_sort | comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-02080-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shortmeghani comparisonofrectalswabglovetipandparticipantcollectedstooltechniquesforgutmicrobiomesampling AT hudsonrobert comparisonofrectalswabglovetipandparticipantcollectedstooltechniquesforgutmicrobiomesampling AT besasiebenjamind comparisonofrectalswabglovetipandparticipantcollectedstooltechniquesforgutmicrobiomesampling AT reveleskellyr comparisonofrectalswabglovetipandparticipantcollectedstooltechniquesforgutmicrobiomesampling AT shahdimpyp comparisonofrectalswabglovetipandparticipantcollectedstooltechniquesforgutmicrobiomesampling AT nicholsonsusannah comparisonofrectalswabglovetipandparticipantcollectedstooltechniquesforgutmicrobiomesampling AT johnsonpaisteresal comparisonofrectalswabglovetipandparticipantcollectedstooltechniquesforgutmicrobiomesampling AT weldonkorri comparisonofrectalswabglovetipandparticipantcollectedstooltechniquesforgutmicrobiomesampling AT laizhao comparisonofrectalswabglovetipandparticipantcollectedstooltechniquesforgutmicrobiomesampling AT leachrobinj comparisonofrectalswabglovetipandparticipantcollectedstooltechniquesforgutmicrobiomesampling AT fongangbernard comparisonofrectalswabglovetipandparticipantcollectedstooltechniquesforgutmicrobiomesampling AT lissmichaela comparisonofrectalswabglovetipandparticipantcollectedstooltechniquesforgutmicrobiomesampling |