Cargando…
Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis
BACKGROUND: The Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) evaluates the patient-reported quality of pain management in adults. A validated APS-POQ-R is pivotal to guide effective pain management with better patient satisfaction. Previous studies revealed that subscales...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33451283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01229-x |
_version_ | 1783637202761154560 |
---|---|
author | Chaw, Sook Hui Lo, Yoke Lin Lee, Jia Yin Wong, Jia Wing Zakaria, Wan Aizat Wan Ruslan, Shairil Rahayu Tan, Wei Keang Shariffuddin, Ina Ismiarti |
author_facet | Chaw, Sook Hui Lo, Yoke Lin Lee, Jia Yin Wong, Jia Wing Zakaria, Wan Aizat Wan Ruslan, Shairil Rahayu Tan, Wei Keang Shariffuddin, Ina Ismiarti |
author_sort | Chaw, Sook Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) evaluates the patient-reported quality of pain management in adults. A validated APS-POQ-R is pivotal to guide effective pain management with better patient satisfaction. Previous studies revealed that subscales of “patients’ perception of pain management” were unstable cross-culturally. This study aims to evaluate the construct validity of the APS-POQ-R in gynecological postoperative patients with a multi-cultural background using confirmatory factor analysis to allow comparisons among different a priori models at the latent factor level. METHODS: Patients aged 18 years old or above and who were scheduled for gynecology surgery were selected. Three different models with a combination of latent factors were based on a priori hypotheses from previous studies. The root-mean-squared error of approximation, comparative fit index, Tucker-Lewis Index, Chi-squared test, and change in Chi-squared statistic given a change in degrees of freedom between models were used to assess the model fit to the present data. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients completed the questionnaire. The five-factor model which was based on Gordon’s study has an acceptable fit for the data and was superior when compared to the one-factor baseline model. Although the four-factor model, which originated from Botti’s study, also demonstrates a good model fit, the “perception of care” construct was excluded in this model. The “perception of care” construct is conceptually important as patient-centered care has become the focus of quality improvement of pain service. CONCLUSIONS: The APS-POQ-R is easy to administer and is useful for quality evaluation in postoperative pain management. The present study demonstrates that a five-factor structure of the APS-POQ-R is the best fitting model in our patient sample. The results of this study provide further evidence to support the use of APS-POQ-R as a measurement tool for pain management evaluation in acute postoperative patients with a multi-cultural background. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7809867 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78098672021-01-18 Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis Chaw, Sook Hui Lo, Yoke Lin Lee, Jia Yin Wong, Jia Wing Zakaria, Wan Aizat Wan Ruslan, Shairil Rahayu Tan, Wei Keang Shariffuddin, Ina Ismiarti BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) evaluates the patient-reported quality of pain management in adults. A validated APS-POQ-R is pivotal to guide effective pain management with better patient satisfaction. Previous studies revealed that subscales of “patients’ perception of pain management” were unstable cross-culturally. This study aims to evaluate the construct validity of the APS-POQ-R in gynecological postoperative patients with a multi-cultural background using confirmatory factor analysis to allow comparisons among different a priori models at the latent factor level. METHODS: Patients aged 18 years old or above and who were scheduled for gynecology surgery were selected. Three different models with a combination of latent factors were based on a priori hypotheses from previous studies. The root-mean-squared error of approximation, comparative fit index, Tucker-Lewis Index, Chi-squared test, and change in Chi-squared statistic given a change in degrees of freedom between models were used to assess the model fit to the present data. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients completed the questionnaire. The five-factor model which was based on Gordon’s study has an acceptable fit for the data and was superior when compared to the one-factor baseline model. Although the four-factor model, which originated from Botti’s study, also demonstrates a good model fit, the “perception of care” construct was excluded in this model. The “perception of care” construct is conceptually important as patient-centered care has become the focus of quality improvement of pain service. CONCLUSIONS: The APS-POQ-R is easy to administer and is useful for quality evaluation in postoperative pain management. The present study demonstrates that a five-factor structure of the APS-POQ-R is the best fitting model in our patient sample. The results of this study provide further evidence to support the use of APS-POQ-R as a measurement tool for pain management evaluation in acute postoperative patients with a multi-cultural background. BioMed Central 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7809867/ /pubmed/33451283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01229-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chaw, Sook Hui Lo, Yoke Lin Lee, Jia Yin Wong, Jia Wing Zakaria, Wan Aizat Wan Ruslan, Shairil Rahayu Tan, Wei Keang Shariffuddin, Ina Ismiarti Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis |
title | Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis |
title_full | Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis |
title_short | Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis |
title_sort | evaluate construct validity of the revised american pain society patient outcome questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33451283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01229-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chawsookhui evaluateconstructvalidityoftherevisedamericanpainsocietypatientoutcomequestionnaireingynecologicalpostoperativepatientsusingconfirmatoryfactoranalysis AT loyokelin evaluateconstructvalidityoftherevisedamericanpainsocietypatientoutcomequestionnaireingynecologicalpostoperativepatientsusingconfirmatoryfactoranalysis AT leejiayin evaluateconstructvalidityoftherevisedamericanpainsocietypatientoutcomequestionnaireingynecologicalpostoperativepatientsusingconfirmatoryfactoranalysis AT wongjiawing evaluateconstructvalidityoftherevisedamericanpainsocietypatientoutcomequestionnaireingynecologicalpostoperativepatientsusingconfirmatoryfactoranalysis AT zakariawanaizatwan evaluateconstructvalidityoftherevisedamericanpainsocietypatientoutcomequestionnaireingynecologicalpostoperativepatientsusingconfirmatoryfactoranalysis AT ruslanshairilrahayu evaluateconstructvalidityoftherevisedamericanpainsocietypatientoutcomequestionnaireingynecologicalpostoperativepatientsusingconfirmatoryfactoranalysis AT tanweikeang evaluateconstructvalidityoftherevisedamericanpainsocietypatientoutcomequestionnaireingynecologicalpostoperativepatientsusingconfirmatoryfactoranalysis AT shariffuddininaismiarti evaluateconstructvalidityoftherevisedamericanpainsocietypatientoutcomequestionnaireingynecologicalpostoperativepatientsusingconfirmatoryfactoranalysis |