Cargando…

Longitudinal evaluation of a hearing protector fit training program

OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluates a training program for fitting different hearing protection devices (HPDs) based on personal attenuation rating (PAR) before, immediately after, and six months after training. METHODS: A total of 67 workers from a public university in the city of São Paulo, Bra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assunção, Caio Henrique de Carvalho, Trabanco, Júlio César, Gomes, Raquel Fornaziero, Moreira, Renata Rodrigues, Samelli, Alessandra Giannella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 srl 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31475692
http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v110i4.8214
_version_ 1783637231653617664
author Assunção, Caio Henrique de Carvalho
Trabanco, Júlio César
Gomes, Raquel Fornaziero
Moreira, Renata Rodrigues
Samelli, Alessandra Giannella
author_facet Assunção, Caio Henrique de Carvalho
Trabanco, Júlio César
Gomes, Raquel Fornaziero
Moreira, Renata Rodrigues
Samelli, Alessandra Giannella
author_sort Assunção, Caio Henrique de Carvalho
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluates a training program for fitting different hearing protection devices (HPDs) based on personal attenuation rating (PAR) before, immediately after, and six months after training. METHODS: A total of 67 workers from a public university in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, were invited to participate in the measurement of PARs for foam and silicone protectors through the 3M™ E-A-Rfit Validation System. Two evaluations were performed for each protector at each sampling date: one after reading printed material (the package instructions) and another after being trained by an audiologist. The same procedures were repeated after six months. The final sample consisted of 30 individuals. ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Larger PAR values were observed after training by the audiologist, and smaller values were observed after six months. Then, after re-training, the values increased again. There were no statistically significant differences in PAR among the HPDs tested. Even after the two training sessions, 23 to 27% of the subjects did not obtain adequate PAR values. CONCLUSION: These findings emphasize the need for continual worker training in the correct fit of earplug HPDs and the importance of longitudinal PAR monitoring. In addition, some workers, despite the training provided, did not adapt to the HPDs used. Therefore, it is essential that other protection methods and/or other HPD types are made available to these individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7809996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Mattioli 1885 srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78099962021-01-29 Longitudinal evaluation of a hearing protector fit training program Assunção, Caio Henrique de Carvalho Trabanco, Júlio César Gomes, Raquel Fornaziero Moreira, Renata Rodrigues Samelli, Alessandra Giannella Med Lav Original Article OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluates a training program for fitting different hearing protection devices (HPDs) based on personal attenuation rating (PAR) before, immediately after, and six months after training. METHODS: A total of 67 workers from a public university in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, were invited to participate in the measurement of PARs for foam and silicone protectors through the 3M™ E-A-Rfit Validation System. Two evaluations were performed for each protector at each sampling date: one after reading printed material (the package instructions) and another after being trained by an audiologist. The same procedures were repeated after six months. The final sample consisted of 30 individuals. ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Larger PAR values were observed after training by the audiologist, and smaller values were observed after six months. Then, after re-training, the values increased again. There were no statistically significant differences in PAR among the HPDs tested. Even after the two training sessions, 23 to 27% of the subjects did not obtain adequate PAR values. CONCLUSION: These findings emphasize the need for continual worker training in the correct fit of earplug HPDs and the importance of longitudinal PAR monitoring. In addition, some workers, despite the training provided, did not adapt to the HPDs used. Therefore, it is essential that other protection methods and/or other HPD types are made available to these individuals. Mattioli 1885 srl 2019 2019-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7809996/ /pubmed/31475692 http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v110i4.8214 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Assunção, Caio Henrique de Carvalho
Trabanco, Júlio César
Gomes, Raquel Fornaziero
Moreira, Renata Rodrigues
Samelli, Alessandra Giannella
Longitudinal evaluation of a hearing protector fit training program
title Longitudinal evaluation of a hearing protector fit training program
title_full Longitudinal evaluation of a hearing protector fit training program
title_fullStr Longitudinal evaluation of a hearing protector fit training program
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal evaluation of a hearing protector fit training program
title_short Longitudinal evaluation of a hearing protector fit training program
title_sort longitudinal evaluation of a hearing protector fit training program
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7809996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31475692
http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v110i4.8214
work_keys_str_mv AT assuncaocaiohenriquedecarvalho longitudinalevaluationofahearingprotectorfittrainingprogram
AT trabancojuliocesar longitudinalevaluationofahearingprotectorfittrainingprogram
AT gomesraquelfornaziero longitudinalevaluationofahearingprotectorfittrainingprogram
AT moreirarenatarodrigues longitudinalevaluationofahearingprotectorfittrainingprogram
AT samellialessandragiannella longitudinalevaluationofahearingprotectorfittrainingprogram