Cargando…

An integrated disease-specific graded prognostic assessment scale for melanoma: contributions of KPS, CITV, number of metastases, and BRAF mutation status

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains a mainstay therapy in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases (BM). While prognostic scales have been developed for melanoma patients who underwent SRS treatment for BM, the pertinence of these scales in the context of molecularly targeted thera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahluwalia, Manmeet, Ali, Mir A, Joshi, Rushikesh S, Park, Eun Suk, Taha, Birra, McCutcheon, Ian, Chiang, Veronica, Hong, Angela, Sinclair, Georges, Bartek, Jiri, Chen, Clark C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7810198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa152
_version_ 1783637271050715136
author Ahluwalia, Manmeet
Ali, Mir A
Joshi, Rushikesh S
Park, Eun Suk
Taha, Birra
McCutcheon, Ian
Chiang, Veronica
Hong, Angela
Sinclair, Georges
Bartek, Jiri
Chen, Clark C
author_facet Ahluwalia, Manmeet
Ali, Mir A
Joshi, Rushikesh S
Park, Eun Suk
Taha, Birra
McCutcheon, Ian
Chiang, Veronica
Hong, Angela
Sinclair, Georges
Bartek, Jiri
Chen, Clark C
author_sort Ahluwalia, Manmeet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains a mainstay therapy in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases (BM). While prognostic scales have been developed for melanoma patients who underwent SRS treatment for BM, the pertinence of these scales in the context of molecularly targeted therapies remains unclear. METHODS: Through a multi-institutional collaboration, we collated the survival patterns of 331 melanoma BM patients with known BRAF mutation status treated with SRS. We established a prognostic scale that was validated in an independent cohort of 174 patients. All patients with BRAF mutations in this series were treated with BRAF inhibitors. Prognostic utility was assessed using Net Reclassification Index (NRI > 0) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) metrics. RESULTS: In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, BRAF mutation status, KPS, number of metastases, and cumulative intracranial tumor volume (CITV) independently contributed to survival prognostication for melanoma patients with SRS-treated BM (P < .05 for all variables). These variables were incorporated into a prognostic scale using the disease-specific graded prognostic assessment (ds-GPA) framework. This integrated melanoma ds-GPA scale was validated in 2 independent cohorts collated through a multi-institutional collaboration. In terms of order of prognostic importance, BRAF mutation status exerted the greatest influence on survival, while KPS, the number of metastases, and CITV exhibited comparable, lesser impacts. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal survival prognostication for SRS-treated patients with melanoma BM requires an integrated assessment of patient characteristics (KPS), tumor characteristics (CITV and number of metastases), and the mutational profile of the melanoma (BRAF mutation status).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7810198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78101982021-01-26 An integrated disease-specific graded prognostic assessment scale for melanoma: contributions of KPS, CITV, number of metastases, and BRAF mutation status Ahluwalia, Manmeet Ali, Mir A Joshi, Rushikesh S Park, Eun Suk Taha, Birra McCutcheon, Ian Chiang, Veronica Hong, Angela Sinclair, Georges Bartek, Jiri Chen, Clark C Neurooncol Adv Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains a mainstay therapy in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases (BM). While prognostic scales have been developed for melanoma patients who underwent SRS treatment for BM, the pertinence of these scales in the context of molecularly targeted therapies remains unclear. METHODS: Through a multi-institutional collaboration, we collated the survival patterns of 331 melanoma BM patients with known BRAF mutation status treated with SRS. We established a prognostic scale that was validated in an independent cohort of 174 patients. All patients with BRAF mutations in this series were treated with BRAF inhibitors. Prognostic utility was assessed using Net Reclassification Index (NRI > 0) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) metrics. RESULTS: In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, BRAF mutation status, KPS, number of metastases, and cumulative intracranial tumor volume (CITV) independently contributed to survival prognostication for melanoma patients with SRS-treated BM (P < .05 for all variables). These variables were incorporated into a prognostic scale using the disease-specific graded prognostic assessment (ds-GPA) framework. This integrated melanoma ds-GPA scale was validated in 2 independent cohorts collated through a multi-institutional collaboration. In terms of order of prognostic importance, BRAF mutation status exerted the greatest influence on survival, while KPS, the number of metastases, and CITV exhibited comparable, lesser impacts. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal survival prognostication for SRS-treated patients with melanoma BM requires an integrated assessment of patient characteristics (KPS), tumor characteristics (CITV and number of metastases), and the mutational profile of the melanoma (BRAF mutation status). Oxford University Press 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7810198/ /pubmed/33506199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa152 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Ahluwalia, Manmeet
Ali, Mir A
Joshi, Rushikesh S
Park, Eun Suk
Taha, Birra
McCutcheon, Ian
Chiang, Veronica
Hong, Angela
Sinclair, Georges
Bartek, Jiri
Chen, Clark C
An integrated disease-specific graded prognostic assessment scale for melanoma: contributions of KPS, CITV, number of metastases, and BRAF mutation status
title An integrated disease-specific graded prognostic assessment scale for melanoma: contributions of KPS, CITV, number of metastases, and BRAF mutation status
title_full An integrated disease-specific graded prognostic assessment scale for melanoma: contributions of KPS, CITV, number of metastases, and BRAF mutation status
title_fullStr An integrated disease-specific graded prognostic assessment scale for melanoma: contributions of KPS, CITV, number of metastases, and BRAF mutation status
title_full_unstemmed An integrated disease-specific graded prognostic assessment scale for melanoma: contributions of KPS, CITV, number of metastases, and BRAF mutation status
title_short An integrated disease-specific graded prognostic assessment scale for melanoma: contributions of KPS, CITV, number of metastases, and BRAF mutation status
title_sort integrated disease-specific graded prognostic assessment scale for melanoma: contributions of kps, citv, number of metastases, and braf mutation status
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7810198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa152
work_keys_str_mv AT ahluwaliamanmeet anintegrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT alimira anintegrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT joshirushikeshs anintegrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT parkeunsuk anintegrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT tahabirra anintegrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT mccutcheonian anintegrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT chiangveronica anintegrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT hongangela anintegrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT sinclairgeorges anintegrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT bartekjiri anintegrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT chenclarkc anintegrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT ahluwaliamanmeet integrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT alimira integrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT joshirushikeshs integrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT parkeunsuk integrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT tahabirra integrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT mccutcheonian integrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT chiangveronica integrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT hongangela integrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT sinclairgeorges integrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT bartekjiri integrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus
AT chenclarkc integrateddiseasespecificgradedprognosticassessmentscaleformelanomacontributionsofkpscitvnumberofmetastasesandbrafmutationstatus