Cargando…

Historical overview and new directions in bioarchaeological trace element analysis: a review

Given their strong affinity for the skeleton, trace elements are often stored in bones and teeth long term. Diet, geography, health, disease, social status, activity, and occupation are some factors which may cause differential exposure to, and uptake of, trace elements, theoretically introducing va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simpson, Rachel, Cooper, David M. L., Swanston, Treena, Coulthard, Ian, Varney, Tamara L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7810633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33520004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01262-4
_version_ 1783637340949839872
author Simpson, Rachel
Cooper, David M. L.
Swanston, Treena
Coulthard, Ian
Varney, Tamara L.
author_facet Simpson, Rachel
Cooper, David M. L.
Swanston, Treena
Coulthard, Ian
Varney, Tamara L.
author_sort Simpson, Rachel
collection PubMed
description Given their strong affinity for the skeleton, trace elements are often stored in bones and teeth long term. Diet, geography, health, disease, social status, activity, and occupation are some factors which may cause differential exposure to, and uptake of, trace elements, theoretically introducing variability in their concentrations and/or ratios in the skeleton. Trace element analysis of bioarchaeological remains has the potential, therefore, to provide rich insights into past human lifeways. This review provides a historical overview of bioarchaeological trace element analysis and comments on the current state of the discipline by highlighting approaches with growing momentum. Popularity for the discipline surged following preliminary studies in the 1960s to 1970s that demonstrated the utility of strontium (Sr) as a dietary indicator. During the 1980s, Sr/Ca ratio and multi-element studies were commonplace in bioarchaeology, linking trace elements with dietary phenomena. Interest in using trace elements for bioarchaeological inferences waned following a period of critiques in the late 1980s to 1990s that argued the discipline failed to account for diagenesis, simplified complex element uptake and regulation processes, and used several unsuitable elements for palaeodietary reconstruction (e.g. those under homeostatic regulation, those without a strong affinity for the skeleton). In the twenty-first century, trace element analyses have been primarily restricted to Sr and lead (Pb) isotope analysis and the study of toxic trace elements, though small pockets of bioarchaeology have continued to analyse multiple elements. Techniques such as micro-sampling, element mapping, and non-traditional stable isotope analysis have provided novel insights which hold the promise of helping to overcome limitations faced by the discipline. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12520-020-01262-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7810633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78106332021-01-28 Historical overview and new directions in bioarchaeological trace element analysis: a review Simpson, Rachel Cooper, David M. L. Swanston, Treena Coulthard, Ian Varney, Tamara L. Archaeol Anthropol Sci Review Given their strong affinity for the skeleton, trace elements are often stored in bones and teeth long term. Diet, geography, health, disease, social status, activity, and occupation are some factors which may cause differential exposure to, and uptake of, trace elements, theoretically introducing variability in their concentrations and/or ratios in the skeleton. Trace element analysis of bioarchaeological remains has the potential, therefore, to provide rich insights into past human lifeways. This review provides a historical overview of bioarchaeological trace element analysis and comments on the current state of the discipline by highlighting approaches with growing momentum. Popularity for the discipline surged following preliminary studies in the 1960s to 1970s that demonstrated the utility of strontium (Sr) as a dietary indicator. During the 1980s, Sr/Ca ratio and multi-element studies were commonplace in bioarchaeology, linking trace elements with dietary phenomena. Interest in using trace elements for bioarchaeological inferences waned following a period of critiques in the late 1980s to 1990s that argued the discipline failed to account for diagenesis, simplified complex element uptake and regulation processes, and used several unsuitable elements for palaeodietary reconstruction (e.g. those under homeostatic regulation, those without a strong affinity for the skeleton). In the twenty-first century, trace element analyses have been primarily restricted to Sr and lead (Pb) isotope analysis and the study of toxic trace elements, though small pockets of bioarchaeology have continued to analyse multiple elements. Techniques such as micro-sampling, element mapping, and non-traditional stable isotope analysis have provided novel insights which hold the promise of helping to overcome limitations faced by the discipline. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12520-020-01262-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7810633/ /pubmed/33520004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01262-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Simpson, Rachel
Cooper, David M. L.
Swanston, Treena
Coulthard, Ian
Varney, Tamara L.
Historical overview and new directions in bioarchaeological trace element analysis: a review
title Historical overview and new directions in bioarchaeological trace element analysis: a review
title_full Historical overview and new directions in bioarchaeological trace element analysis: a review
title_fullStr Historical overview and new directions in bioarchaeological trace element analysis: a review
title_full_unstemmed Historical overview and new directions in bioarchaeological trace element analysis: a review
title_short Historical overview and new directions in bioarchaeological trace element analysis: a review
title_sort historical overview and new directions in bioarchaeological trace element analysis: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7810633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33520004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01262-4
work_keys_str_mv AT simpsonrachel historicaloverviewandnewdirectionsinbioarchaeologicaltraceelementanalysisareview
AT cooperdavidml historicaloverviewandnewdirectionsinbioarchaeologicaltraceelementanalysisareview
AT swanstontreena historicaloverviewandnewdirectionsinbioarchaeologicaltraceelementanalysisareview
AT coulthardian historicaloverviewandnewdirectionsinbioarchaeologicaltraceelementanalysisareview
AT varneytamaral historicaloverviewandnewdirectionsinbioarchaeologicaltraceelementanalysisareview