Cargando…
Comparison of two fluorescent probes in preclinical non-invasive imaging and image-guided debridement surgery of Staphylococcal biofilm implant infections
Implant-associated infections are challenging to diagnose and treat. Fluorescent probes have been heralded as a technologic advancement that can improve our ability to non-invasively identify infecting organisms, as well as guide the inexact procedure of surgical debridement. This study’s purpose wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7810895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33452271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78362-7 |
_version_ | 1783637393250713600 |
---|---|
author | Park, Howard Y. Zoller, Stephen D. Hegde, Vishal Sheppard, William Burke, Zachary Blumstein, Gideon Hamad, Christopher Sprague, Marina Hoang, John Smith, Ryan Romero Pastrana, Francisco Czupryna, Julie Miller, Lloyd S. López-Álvarez, Marina Bispo, Mafalda van Oosten, Marleen van Dijl, Jan Maarten Francis, Kevin P. Bernthal, Nicholas M. |
author_facet | Park, Howard Y. Zoller, Stephen D. Hegde, Vishal Sheppard, William Burke, Zachary Blumstein, Gideon Hamad, Christopher Sprague, Marina Hoang, John Smith, Ryan Romero Pastrana, Francisco Czupryna, Julie Miller, Lloyd S. López-Álvarez, Marina Bispo, Mafalda van Oosten, Marleen van Dijl, Jan Maarten Francis, Kevin P. Bernthal, Nicholas M. |
author_sort | Park, Howard Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Implant-associated infections are challenging to diagnose and treat. Fluorescent probes have been heralded as a technologic advancement that can improve our ability to non-invasively identify infecting organisms, as well as guide the inexact procedure of surgical debridement. This study’s purpose was to compare two fluorescent probes for their ability to localize Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infections on spinal implants utilizing noninvasive optical imaging, then assessing the broader applicability of the more successful probe in other infection animal models. This was followed by real-time, fluorescence image-guided surgery to facilitate debridement of infected tissue. The two probe candidates, a labelled antibiotic that targets peptidoglycan (Vanco-800CW), and the other, a labelled antibody targeting the immunodominant Staphylococcal antigen A (1D9-680), were injected into mice with spine implant infections. Mice were then imaged noninvasively with near infrared fluorescent imaging at wavelengths corresponding to the two probe candidates. Both probes localized to the infection, with the 1D9-680 probe showing greater fidelity over time. The 1D9-680 probe was then tested in mouse models of shoulder implant and allograft infection, demonstrating its broader applicability. Finally, an image-guided surgery system which superimposes fluorescent signals over analog, real-time, tissue images was employed to facilitate debridement of fluorescent-labelled bacteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7810895 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78108952021-01-21 Comparison of two fluorescent probes in preclinical non-invasive imaging and image-guided debridement surgery of Staphylococcal biofilm implant infections Park, Howard Y. Zoller, Stephen D. Hegde, Vishal Sheppard, William Burke, Zachary Blumstein, Gideon Hamad, Christopher Sprague, Marina Hoang, John Smith, Ryan Romero Pastrana, Francisco Czupryna, Julie Miller, Lloyd S. López-Álvarez, Marina Bispo, Mafalda van Oosten, Marleen van Dijl, Jan Maarten Francis, Kevin P. Bernthal, Nicholas M. Sci Rep Article Implant-associated infections are challenging to diagnose and treat. Fluorescent probes have been heralded as a technologic advancement that can improve our ability to non-invasively identify infecting organisms, as well as guide the inexact procedure of surgical debridement. This study’s purpose was to compare two fluorescent probes for their ability to localize Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infections on spinal implants utilizing noninvasive optical imaging, then assessing the broader applicability of the more successful probe in other infection animal models. This was followed by real-time, fluorescence image-guided surgery to facilitate debridement of infected tissue. The two probe candidates, a labelled antibiotic that targets peptidoglycan (Vanco-800CW), and the other, a labelled antibody targeting the immunodominant Staphylococcal antigen A (1D9-680), were injected into mice with spine implant infections. Mice were then imaged noninvasively with near infrared fluorescent imaging at wavelengths corresponding to the two probe candidates. Both probes localized to the infection, with the 1D9-680 probe showing greater fidelity over time. The 1D9-680 probe was then tested in mouse models of shoulder implant and allograft infection, demonstrating its broader applicability. Finally, an image-guided surgery system which superimposes fluorescent signals over analog, real-time, tissue images was employed to facilitate debridement of fluorescent-labelled bacteria. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7810895/ /pubmed/33452271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78362-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Park, Howard Y. Zoller, Stephen D. Hegde, Vishal Sheppard, William Burke, Zachary Blumstein, Gideon Hamad, Christopher Sprague, Marina Hoang, John Smith, Ryan Romero Pastrana, Francisco Czupryna, Julie Miller, Lloyd S. López-Álvarez, Marina Bispo, Mafalda van Oosten, Marleen van Dijl, Jan Maarten Francis, Kevin P. Bernthal, Nicholas M. Comparison of two fluorescent probes in preclinical non-invasive imaging and image-guided debridement surgery of Staphylococcal biofilm implant infections |
title | Comparison of two fluorescent probes in preclinical non-invasive imaging and image-guided debridement surgery of Staphylococcal biofilm implant infections |
title_full | Comparison of two fluorescent probes in preclinical non-invasive imaging and image-guided debridement surgery of Staphylococcal biofilm implant infections |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two fluorescent probes in preclinical non-invasive imaging and image-guided debridement surgery of Staphylococcal biofilm implant infections |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two fluorescent probes in preclinical non-invasive imaging and image-guided debridement surgery of Staphylococcal biofilm implant infections |
title_short | Comparison of two fluorescent probes in preclinical non-invasive imaging and image-guided debridement surgery of Staphylococcal biofilm implant infections |
title_sort | comparison of two fluorescent probes in preclinical non-invasive imaging and image-guided debridement surgery of staphylococcal biofilm implant infections |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7810895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33452271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78362-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkhowardy comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT zollerstephend comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT hegdevishal comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT sheppardwilliam comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT burkezachary comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT blumsteingideon comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT hamadchristopher comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT spraguemarina comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT hoangjohn comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT smithryan comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT romeropastranafrancisco comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT czuprynajulie comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT millerlloyds comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT lopezalvarezmarina comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT bispomafalda comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT vanoostenmarleen comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT vandijljanmaarten comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT franciskevinp comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections AT bernthalnicholasm comparisonoftwofluorescentprobesinpreclinicalnoninvasiveimagingandimageguideddebridementsurgeryofstaphylococcalbiofilmimplantinfections |