Cargando…

Recent advances in the management of nut allergy

Peanut/tree nut allergy is common and has been associated with particularly severe reactions. Epidemiological data have shown that the prevalence ranges between 0.05% and 4.9% for tree nut and between 0.5% and 3% for peanut. These large variations can be explained by differences in the age of includ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Midun, Elise, Radulovic, Suzana, Brough, Helen, Caubet, Jean-Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Allergy Organization 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7811165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33510829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100491
_version_ 1783637445347115008
author Midun, Elise
Radulovic, Suzana
Brough, Helen
Caubet, Jean-Christoph
author_facet Midun, Elise
Radulovic, Suzana
Brough, Helen
Caubet, Jean-Christoph
author_sort Midun, Elise
collection PubMed
description Peanut/tree nut allergy is common and has been associated with particularly severe reactions. Epidemiological data have shown that the prevalence ranges between 0.05% and 4.9% for tree nut and between 0.5% and 3% for peanut. These large variations can be explained by differences in the age of included patients and the geographical region. In addition, the food consumption modality (ie, raw versus roasted) plays a major role, as heat treatment has the capacity to modify the allergenicity of nuts and legumes. Nut allergies tend to persist into adulthood and consequently have a high impact on quality of life. Recently, it has been demonstrated that a significant proportion of nut allergic patients are able to tolerate other nuts. As opposed to the avoidance of all nuts, this approach is currently proposed in several tertiary allergy centers. However, diagnosis of nut allergy is particularly difficult due to co-sensitization leading to high rate of false positive skin prick tests and/or specific IgE to whole allergen extracts. The use of component resolved diagnosis leads to major improvement of diagnosis, particularly to distinguish between primary and secondary nut allergies. The basophil activation test has been suggested to be useful but is still used mainly as a research tool. Thus, diagnosis remains mainly based on the oral food challenge, which is considered as the gold standard. Regarding treatment, avoidance remains the cornerstone of management of nut allergy. Oral immunotherapy is increasingly proposed as an alternative management strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7811165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher World Allergy Organization
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78111652021-01-27 Recent advances in the management of nut allergy Midun, Elise Radulovic, Suzana Brough, Helen Caubet, Jean-Christoph World Allergy Organ J Article Peanut/tree nut allergy is common and has been associated with particularly severe reactions. Epidemiological data have shown that the prevalence ranges between 0.05% and 4.9% for tree nut and between 0.5% and 3% for peanut. These large variations can be explained by differences in the age of included patients and the geographical region. In addition, the food consumption modality (ie, raw versus roasted) plays a major role, as heat treatment has the capacity to modify the allergenicity of nuts and legumes. Nut allergies tend to persist into adulthood and consequently have a high impact on quality of life. Recently, it has been demonstrated that a significant proportion of nut allergic patients are able to tolerate other nuts. As opposed to the avoidance of all nuts, this approach is currently proposed in several tertiary allergy centers. However, diagnosis of nut allergy is particularly difficult due to co-sensitization leading to high rate of false positive skin prick tests and/or specific IgE to whole allergen extracts. The use of component resolved diagnosis leads to major improvement of diagnosis, particularly to distinguish between primary and secondary nut allergies. The basophil activation test has been suggested to be useful but is still used mainly as a research tool. Thus, diagnosis remains mainly based on the oral food challenge, which is considered as the gold standard. Regarding treatment, avoidance remains the cornerstone of management of nut allergy. Oral immunotherapy is increasingly proposed as an alternative management strategy. World Allergy Organization 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7811165/ /pubmed/33510829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100491 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Midun, Elise
Radulovic, Suzana
Brough, Helen
Caubet, Jean-Christoph
Recent advances in the management of nut allergy
title Recent advances in the management of nut allergy
title_full Recent advances in the management of nut allergy
title_fullStr Recent advances in the management of nut allergy
title_full_unstemmed Recent advances in the management of nut allergy
title_short Recent advances in the management of nut allergy
title_sort recent advances in the management of nut allergy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7811165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33510829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100491
work_keys_str_mv AT midunelise recentadvancesinthemanagementofnutallergy
AT radulovicsuzana recentadvancesinthemanagementofnutallergy
AT broughhelen recentadvancesinthemanagementofnutallergy
AT caubetjeanchristoph recentadvancesinthemanagementofnutallergy