Cargando…

Phase 3 Efficacy (Worse-Eye Analysis) and Long-Term Safety Evaluation of OTX-101 in Patients with Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

BACKGROUND: OTX-101 is approved for treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS). We present results of a phase 3 worse-eye efficacy analysis and 1-year safety extension. METHODS: During the double-masked treatment phase, patients with bilateral KCS were randomized 1:1 to 12 weeks OTX-101 or vehicl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheppard, John, Bergmann, Mark, Schechter, Barry A, Luchs, Jodi, Ogundele, Abayomi, Karpecki, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7811471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469259
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S279364
_version_ 1783637503300861952
author Sheppard, John
Bergmann, Mark
Schechter, Barry A
Luchs, Jodi
Ogundele, Abayomi
Karpecki, Paul
author_facet Sheppard, John
Bergmann, Mark
Schechter, Barry A
Luchs, Jodi
Ogundele, Abayomi
Karpecki, Paul
author_sort Sheppard, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: OTX-101 is approved for treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS). We present results of a phase 3 worse-eye efficacy analysis and 1-year safety extension. METHODS: During the double-masked treatment phase, patients with bilateral KCS were randomized 1:1 to 12 weeks OTX-101 or vehicle 1 drop per eye twice daily. Efficacy assessments included Schirmer’s test and corneal and conjunctival staining. All patients who completed the treatment phase were eligible for enrollment in the open-label extension and received 1 drop OTX-101 twice daily for up to 52 weeks. Safety endpoints included adverse event (AE) monitoring, Snellen visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), slit-lamp examination (SLE), and dilated fundoscopy. RESULTS: Overall, 745 and 258 patients enrolled in the treatment and safety extension phases, respectively. At 12 weeks, number (%) of patients with Schirmer’s score increase of ≥10 mm from baseline was 76 (20.5%) vs. 42 (11.3%) for OTX-101 vs. vehicle (P=0.0005). OTX-101 significantly improved total conjunctival staining vs. vehicle at week 12 (least squares mean change from baseline −1.65 [0.12] vs. −1.12 [0.12], P=0.0013), and number (%) of patients with clear central corneas vs. vehicle at week 12 (222 [64.0%] vs. 199 [55.3%], P=0.0179). In the 1-year safety extension, AEs were mostly mild; instillation site pain was most common in 59 (22.9%) patients (17 [13.2%] vs. 42 [32.6%] patients receiving prior OTX-101 and vehicle). No safety concerns were raised by VA, IOP, SLE, and fundoscopy. CONCLUSION: OTX-101 efficacy was confirmed in the eye with lower baseline Schirmer’s score. OTX-101 was well tolerated long term. CLINICAL TRIAL: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on July 27, 2016. NCT02845674 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02845674?term=OTX-101&draw=2&rank=1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7811471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78114712021-01-18 Phase 3 Efficacy (Worse-Eye Analysis) and Long-Term Safety Evaluation of OTX-101 in Patients with Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca Sheppard, John Bergmann, Mark Schechter, Barry A Luchs, Jodi Ogundele, Abayomi Karpecki, Paul Clin Ophthalmol Clinical Trial Report BACKGROUND: OTX-101 is approved for treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS). We present results of a phase 3 worse-eye efficacy analysis and 1-year safety extension. METHODS: During the double-masked treatment phase, patients with bilateral KCS were randomized 1:1 to 12 weeks OTX-101 or vehicle 1 drop per eye twice daily. Efficacy assessments included Schirmer’s test and corneal and conjunctival staining. All patients who completed the treatment phase were eligible for enrollment in the open-label extension and received 1 drop OTX-101 twice daily for up to 52 weeks. Safety endpoints included adverse event (AE) monitoring, Snellen visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), slit-lamp examination (SLE), and dilated fundoscopy. RESULTS: Overall, 745 and 258 patients enrolled in the treatment and safety extension phases, respectively. At 12 weeks, number (%) of patients with Schirmer’s score increase of ≥10 mm from baseline was 76 (20.5%) vs. 42 (11.3%) for OTX-101 vs. vehicle (P=0.0005). OTX-101 significantly improved total conjunctival staining vs. vehicle at week 12 (least squares mean change from baseline −1.65 [0.12] vs. −1.12 [0.12], P=0.0013), and number (%) of patients with clear central corneas vs. vehicle at week 12 (222 [64.0%] vs. 199 [55.3%], P=0.0179). In the 1-year safety extension, AEs were mostly mild; instillation site pain was most common in 59 (22.9%) patients (17 [13.2%] vs. 42 [32.6%] patients receiving prior OTX-101 and vehicle). No safety concerns were raised by VA, IOP, SLE, and fundoscopy. CONCLUSION: OTX-101 efficacy was confirmed in the eye with lower baseline Schirmer’s score. OTX-101 was well tolerated long term. CLINICAL TRIAL: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on July 27, 2016. NCT02845674 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02845674?term=OTX-101&draw=2&rank=1. Dove 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7811471/ /pubmed/33469259 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S279364 Text en © 2021 Sheppard et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Sheppard, John
Bergmann, Mark
Schechter, Barry A
Luchs, Jodi
Ogundele, Abayomi
Karpecki, Paul
Phase 3 Efficacy (Worse-Eye Analysis) and Long-Term Safety Evaluation of OTX-101 in Patients with Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
title Phase 3 Efficacy (Worse-Eye Analysis) and Long-Term Safety Evaluation of OTX-101 in Patients with Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
title_full Phase 3 Efficacy (Worse-Eye Analysis) and Long-Term Safety Evaluation of OTX-101 in Patients with Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
title_fullStr Phase 3 Efficacy (Worse-Eye Analysis) and Long-Term Safety Evaluation of OTX-101 in Patients with Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
title_full_unstemmed Phase 3 Efficacy (Worse-Eye Analysis) and Long-Term Safety Evaluation of OTX-101 in Patients with Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
title_short Phase 3 Efficacy (Worse-Eye Analysis) and Long-Term Safety Evaluation of OTX-101 in Patients with Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
title_sort phase 3 efficacy (worse-eye analysis) and long-term safety evaluation of otx-101 in patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7811471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469259
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S279364
work_keys_str_mv AT sheppardjohn phase3efficacyworseeyeanalysisandlongtermsafetyevaluationofotx101inpatientswithkeratoconjunctivitissicca
AT bergmannmark phase3efficacyworseeyeanalysisandlongtermsafetyevaluationofotx101inpatientswithkeratoconjunctivitissicca
AT schechterbarrya phase3efficacyworseeyeanalysisandlongtermsafetyevaluationofotx101inpatientswithkeratoconjunctivitissicca
AT luchsjodi phase3efficacyworseeyeanalysisandlongtermsafetyevaluationofotx101inpatientswithkeratoconjunctivitissicca
AT ogundeleabayomi phase3efficacyworseeyeanalysisandlongtermsafetyevaluationofotx101inpatientswithkeratoconjunctivitissicca
AT karpeckipaul phase3efficacyworseeyeanalysisandlongtermsafetyevaluationofotx101inpatientswithkeratoconjunctivitissicca