Cargando…

Cataract surgery practice patterns worldwide: a survey

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of a global survey on cataract practice patterns related to preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative care, surgical setting and personnel allocation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An online 28 questions survey was sent to 240 ophthalmologists asking to describe prevail...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rossi, Tommaso, Romano, Mario R, Iannetta, Danilo, Romano, Vito, Gualdi, Luca, D'Agostino, Isabella, Ripandelli, Guido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33501377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000464
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To report the results of a global survey on cataract practice patterns related to preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative care, surgical setting and personnel allocation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An online 28 questions survey was sent to 240 ophthalmologists asking to describe prevailing trends in their institutions across 38 countries and 5 continents. Questions inquired country, institution, surgical volume and setting, anaesthesia, preoperative and intraoperative examination and postsurgical care. Statistical analysis used crosstabs lambda statistics for non-parametric nominal variables. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 209/240 (87%) ophthalmologists responded: 38% representing public hospitals, 36% private practices and 26% academic sites; overall surgical volume was between 241 700 and 410 500 cataracts per year. There was a significant correlation between type of institution and surgical volume. Complete results available in online (https://freeonlinesurveys.com/r/W6BcLLxy). CONCLUSION: Cataract surgery related patterns of perioperative care showed significant difference among respondents, regardless to type of institution, surgical volume and country. Many evidence-based procedures are unevenly practiced around the world and some widespread and expensive habits lack solid scientific evidence while consuming enormous amount of resources both monetary and human. There is a need to reach consensus and share evidence-based practice patterns.