Cargando…
Government’s subsidisation policy and utilisation of smoking cessation treatments: a population-based cross-sectional study in Taiwan
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the associations between the Second-Generation Cessation Payment Scheme (SCPS) and the use of smoking cessation treatments. Furthermore, these associations were compared between light and heavy smokers in Taiwan. DESIGN: This study had a cross-sectional design. SETTIN...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33441354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040424 |
_version_ | 1783637598014537728 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Sheng-Kuang Kao, Chi-Wen Chuang, Hui-Wan Tseng, Yi-Kai Chen, Wan-Chun Yeh, Chien-Chih Lai, Chung-Yu Yen, Li-Chen Chiu, Yu-Lung |
author_facet | Wang, Sheng-Kuang Kao, Chi-Wen Chuang, Hui-Wan Tseng, Yi-Kai Chen, Wan-Chun Yeh, Chien-Chih Lai, Chung-Yu Yen, Li-Chen Chiu, Yu-Lung |
author_sort | Wang, Sheng-Kuang |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study examined the associations between the Second-Generation Cessation Payment Scheme (SCPS) and the use of smoking cessation treatments. Furthermore, these associations were compared between light and heavy smokers in Taiwan. DESIGN: This study had a cross-sectional design. SETTING: Data were obtained from the Taiwan Adult Smoking Behaviour Surveillance System 2010–2011 and 2013–2014; data for each year consisted of a nationally representative sample of adults aged 18 years and older. PARTICIPANTS: Current smokers who had either quit or made a serious attempt to quit smoking were selected for the analysis. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure was the use of a smoking cessation clinic or pharmacy in a twice daily to quit smoking. RESULTS: According to multivariate analysis, the SCPS was positively associated with the combined use of a smoking cessation clinic and a pharmacy (OR=3.947; 95% CI: 1.359 to 11.463) when individual-level predictors (gender, age, education level, marital status, monthly household income, daily cigarette consumption, smoking status and self-reported health) were controlled. Heavy smokers showed a significant increase in the sole use of a pharmacy (OR=1.676; 95% CI: 1.094 to 2.569) and combined use of a smoking cessation clinic and pharmacy (OR=8.984; 95% CI: 1.914 to 42.173) after the SCPS was introduced. In addition, when related factors were controlled, the use of smoking cessation services was more frequent among heavy smokers than light smokers, including any treatment (OR=1.594; 95% CI: 1.308 to 1.942), a smoking cessation clinic (OR=1.539; 95% CI: 1.232 to 1.922), a pharmacy (OR=1.632; 95% CI: 1.157 to 2.302) and the combination of a smoking cessation clinic and pharmacy (OR=4.608; 95% CI: 1.331 to 15.949). CONCLUSIONS: The SCPS subsidisation policy increased the use of smoking cessation treatments, particularly among heavy smokers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7812102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78121022021-01-25 Government’s subsidisation policy and utilisation of smoking cessation treatments: a population-based cross-sectional study in Taiwan Wang, Sheng-Kuang Kao, Chi-Wen Chuang, Hui-Wan Tseng, Yi-Kai Chen, Wan-Chun Yeh, Chien-Chih Lai, Chung-Yu Yen, Li-Chen Chiu, Yu-Lung BMJ Open Smoking and Tobacco OBJECTIVES: This study examined the associations between the Second-Generation Cessation Payment Scheme (SCPS) and the use of smoking cessation treatments. Furthermore, these associations were compared between light and heavy smokers in Taiwan. DESIGN: This study had a cross-sectional design. SETTING: Data were obtained from the Taiwan Adult Smoking Behaviour Surveillance System 2010–2011 and 2013–2014; data for each year consisted of a nationally representative sample of adults aged 18 years and older. PARTICIPANTS: Current smokers who had either quit or made a serious attempt to quit smoking were selected for the analysis. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure was the use of a smoking cessation clinic or pharmacy in a twice daily to quit smoking. RESULTS: According to multivariate analysis, the SCPS was positively associated with the combined use of a smoking cessation clinic and a pharmacy (OR=3.947; 95% CI: 1.359 to 11.463) when individual-level predictors (gender, age, education level, marital status, monthly household income, daily cigarette consumption, smoking status and self-reported health) were controlled. Heavy smokers showed a significant increase in the sole use of a pharmacy (OR=1.676; 95% CI: 1.094 to 2.569) and combined use of a smoking cessation clinic and pharmacy (OR=8.984; 95% CI: 1.914 to 42.173) after the SCPS was introduced. In addition, when related factors were controlled, the use of smoking cessation services was more frequent among heavy smokers than light smokers, including any treatment (OR=1.594; 95% CI: 1.308 to 1.942), a smoking cessation clinic (OR=1.539; 95% CI: 1.232 to 1.922), a pharmacy (OR=1.632; 95% CI: 1.157 to 2.302) and the combination of a smoking cessation clinic and pharmacy (OR=4.608; 95% CI: 1.331 to 15.949). CONCLUSIONS: The SCPS subsidisation policy increased the use of smoking cessation treatments, particularly among heavy smokers. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7812102/ /pubmed/33441354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040424 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Smoking and Tobacco Wang, Sheng-Kuang Kao, Chi-Wen Chuang, Hui-Wan Tseng, Yi-Kai Chen, Wan-Chun Yeh, Chien-Chih Lai, Chung-Yu Yen, Li-Chen Chiu, Yu-Lung Government’s subsidisation policy and utilisation of smoking cessation treatments: a population-based cross-sectional study in Taiwan |
title | Government’s subsidisation policy and utilisation of smoking cessation treatments: a population-based cross-sectional study in Taiwan |
title_full | Government’s subsidisation policy and utilisation of smoking cessation treatments: a population-based cross-sectional study in Taiwan |
title_fullStr | Government’s subsidisation policy and utilisation of smoking cessation treatments: a population-based cross-sectional study in Taiwan |
title_full_unstemmed | Government’s subsidisation policy and utilisation of smoking cessation treatments: a population-based cross-sectional study in Taiwan |
title_short | Government’s subsidisation policy and utilisation of smoking cessation treatments: a population-based cross-sectional study in Taiwan |
title_sort | government’s subsidisation policy and utilisation of smoking cessation treatments: a population-based cross-sectional study in taiwan |
topic | Smoking and Tobacco |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33441354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040424 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangshengkuang governmentssubsidisationpolicyandutilisationofsmokingcessationtreatmentsapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyintaiwan AT kaochiwen governmentssubsidisationpolicyandutilisationofsmokingcessationtreatmentsapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyintaiwan AT chuanghuiwan governmentssubsidisationpolicyandutilisationofsmokingcessationtreatmentsapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyintaiwan AT tsengyikai governmentssubsidisationpolicyandutilisationofsmokingcessationtreatmentsapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyintaiwan AT chenwanchun governmentssubsidisationpolicyandutilisationofsmokingcessationtreatmentsapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyintaiwan AT yehchienchih governmentssubsidisationpolicyandutilisationofsmokingcessationtreatmentsapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyintaiwan AT laichungyu governmentssubsidisationpolicyandutilisationofsmokingcessationtreatmentsapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyintaiwan AT yenlichen governmentssubsidisationpolicyandutilisationofsmokingcessationtreatmentsapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyintaiwan AT chiuyulung governmentssubsidisationpolicyandutilisationofsmokingcessationtreatmentsapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudyintaiwan |