Cargando…
Comparing the cumulative live birth rate of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfers between IVF cycles: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (the ToF trial)
INTRODUCTION: In vitro fertilisation (IVF) has evolved as an intervention of choice to help couples with infertility to conceive. In the last decade, a strategy change in the day of embryo transfer has been developed. Many IVF centres choose nowadays to transfer at later stages of embryo development...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33441363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042395 |
_version_ | 1783637598971887616 |
---|---|
author | Cornelisse, Simone Ramos, Liliana Arends, Brigitte Brink-van der Vlugt, Janneke J de Bruin, Jan Peter Curfs, Max HJN Derhaag, Josien van Dongen, Angelique van Echten-Arends, Jannie Groenewoud, Eva R Maas, Jacques WM Pieterse, Quirine van Santbrink, Evert JP Slappendel, Els Traas, Maaike AF Visser, Jantien Vergouw, Carlijn G Verhoeve, Harold R van der Westerlaken, Lucette AJ Wurth, Yvonne van der Zanden, Moniek Braat, Didi DM van Wely, Madelon Mastenbroek, Sebastiaan Fleischer, Kathrin |
author_facet | Cornelisse, Simone Ramos, Liliana Arends, Brigitte Brink-van der Vlugt, Janneke J de Bruin, Jan Peter Curfs, Max HJN Derhaag, Josien van Dongen, Angelique van Echten-Arends, Jannie Groenewoud, Eva R Maas, Jacques WM Pieterse, Quirine van Santbrink, Evert JP Slappendel, Els Traas, Maaike AF Visser, Jantien Vergouw, Carlijn G Verhoeve, Harold R van der Westerlaken, Lucette AJ Wurth, Yvonne van der Zanden, Moniek Braat, Didi DM van Wely, Madelon Mastenbroek, Sebastiaan Fleischer, Kathrin |
author_sort | Cornelisse, Simone |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In vitro fertilisation (IVF) has evolved as an intervention of choice to help couples with infertility to conceive. In the last decade, a strategy change in the day of embryo transfer has been developed. Many IVF centres choose nowadays to transfer at later stages of embryo development, for example, transferring embryos at blastocyst stage instead of cleavage stage. However, it still is not known which embryo transfer policy in IVF is more efficient in terms of cumulative live birth rate (cLBR), following a fresh and the subsequent frozen–thawed transfers after one oocyte retrieval. Furthermore, studies reporting on obstetric and neonatal outcomes from both transfer policies are limited. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We have set up a multicentre randomised superiority trial in the Netherlands, named the Three or Fivetrial. We plan to include 1200 women with an indication for IVF with at least four embryos available on day 2 after the oocyte retrieval. Women are randomly allocated to either (1) control group: embryo transfer on day 3 and cryopreservation of supernumerary good-quality embryos on day 3 or 4, or (2) intervention group: embryo transfer on day 5 and cryopreservation of supernumerary good-quality embryos on day 5 or 6. The primary outcome is the cLBR per oocyte retrieval. Secondary outcomes include LBR following fresh transfer, multiple pregnancy rate and time until pregnancy leading a live birth. We will also assess the obstetric and neonatal outcomes, costs and patients’ treatment burden. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects in the Netherlands in June 2018 (CCMO NL 64060.000.18). The results of this trial will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed and in open access journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register (NL 6857). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7812106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78121062021-01-25 Comparing the cumulative live birth rate of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfers between IVF cycles: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (the ToF trial) Cornelisse, Simone Ramos, Liliana Arends, Brigitte Brink-van der Vlugt, Janneke J de Bruin, Jan Peter Curfs, Max HJN Derhaag, Josien van Dongen, Angelique van Echten-Arends, Jannie Groenewoud, Eva R Maas, Jacques WM Pieterse, Quirine van Santbrink, Evert JP Slappendel, Els Traas, Maaike AF Visser, Jantien Vergouw, Carlijn G Verhoeve, Harold R van der Westerlaken, Lucette AJ Wurth, Yvonne van der Zanden, Moniek Braat, Didi DM van Wely, Madelon Mastenbroek, Sebastiaan Fleischer, Kathrin BMJ Open Reproductive Medicine INTRODUCTION: In vitro fertilisation (IVF) has evolved as an intervention of choice to help couples with infertility to conceive. In the last decade, a strategy change in the day of embryo transfer has been developed. Many IVF centres choose nowadays to transfer at later stages of embryo development, for example, transferring embryos at blastocyst stage instead of cleavage stage. However, it still is not known which embryo transfer policy in IVF is more efficient in terms of cumulative live birth rate (cLBR), following a fresh and the subsequent frozen–thawed transfers after one oocyte retrieval. Furthermore, studies reporting on obstetric and neonatal outcomes from both transfer policies are limited. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We have set up a multicentre randomised superiority trial in the Netherlands, named the Three or Fivetrial. We plan to include 1200 women with an indication for IVF with at least four embryos available on day 2 after the oocyte retrieval. Women are randomly allocated to either (1) control group: embryo transfer on day 3 and cryopreservation of supernumerary good-quality embryos on day 3 or 4, or (2) intervention group: embryo transfer on day 5 and cryopreservation of supernumerary good-quality embryos on day 5 or 6. The primary outcome is the cLBR per oocyte retrieval. Secondary outcomes include LBR following fresh transfer, multiple pregnancy rate and time until pregnancy leading a live birth. We will also assess the obstetric and neonatal outcomes, costs and patients’ treatment burden. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects in the Netherlands in June 2018 (CCMO NL 64060.000.18). The results of this trial will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed and in open access journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register (NL 6857). BMJ Publishing Group 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7812106/ /pubmed/33441363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042395 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Reproductive Medicine Cornelisse, Simone Ramos, Liliana Arends, Brigitte Brink-van der Vlugt, Janneke J de Bruin, Jan Peter Curfs, Max HJN Derhaag, Josien van Dongen, Angelique van Echten-Arends, Jannie Groenewoud, Eva R Maas, Jacques WM Pieterse, Quirine van Santbrink, Evert JP Slappendel, Els Traas, Maaike AF Visser, Jantien Vergouw, Carlijn G Verhoeve, Harold R van der Westerlaken, Lucette AJ Wurth, Yvonne van der Zanden, Moniek Braat, Didi DM van Wely, Madelon Mastenbroek, Sebastiaan Fleischer, Kathrin Comparing the cumulative live birth rate of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfers between IVF cycles: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (the ToF trial) |
title | Comparing the cumulative live birth rate of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfers between IVF cycles: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (the ToF trial) |
title_full | Comparing the cumulative live birth rate of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfers between IVF cycles: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (the ToF trial) |
title_fullStr | Comparing the cumulative live birth rate of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfers between IVF cycles: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (the ToF trial) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the cumulative live birth rate of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfers between IVF cycles: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (the ToF trial) |
title_short | Comparing the cumulative live birth rate of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfers between IVF cycles: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (the ToF trial) |
title_sort | comparing the cumulative live birth rate of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfers between ivf cycles: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (the tof trial) |
topic | Reproductive Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33441363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042395 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cornelissesimone comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT ramosliliana comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT arendsbrigitte comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT brinkvandervlugtjannekej comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT debruinjanpeter comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT curfsmaxhjn comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT derhaagjosien comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT vandongenangelique comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT vanechtenarendsjannie comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT groenewoudevar comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT maasjacqueswm comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT pietersequirine comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT vansantbrinkevertjp comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT slappendelels comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT traasmaaikeaf comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT visserjantien comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT vergouwcarlijng comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT verhoeveharoldr comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT vanderwesterlakenlucetteaj comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT wurthyvonne comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT vanderzandenmoniek comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT braatdididm comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT vanwelymadelon comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT mastenbroeksebastiaan comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial AT fleischerkathrin comparingthecumulativelivebirthrateofcleavagestageversusblastocyststageembryotransfersbetweenivfcyclesastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledsuperioritytrialthetoftrial |