Cargando…

Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is better than low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare APRV and LTVV on patients with ARDS. METHODS: Randomized co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Xi, Wu, Qin, Yang, Hao, Dong, Wei, Wang, Bo, Zhang, Zhongwei, Liang, Guopeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33490153
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6917
_version_ 1783637625700089856
author Zhong, Xi
Wu, Qin
Yang, Hao
Dong, Wei
Wang, Bo
Zhang, Zhongwei
Liang, Guopeng
author_facet Zhong, Xi
Wu, Qin
Yang, Hao
Dong, Wei
Wang, Bo
Zhang, Zhongwei
Liang, Guopeng
author_sort Zhong, Xi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is better than low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare APRV and LTVV on patients with ARDS. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes in ARDS ventilator therapy with APRV or LTVV were identified using Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and The Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database (SinoMed) from inception to March 2019. RESULTS: A total of 7 RCTs with a 405 patients were eligible for our meta-analysis. The results revealed that APRV was associated with lower hospital mortality [405 patients; odds ratio (OR), 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37–0.88; P=0.01], a shorter time of ventilator therapy [373 patients; mean difference (MD), 5.36; 95% CI, 1.99–8.73; P=0.002], and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (315 patients; MD, −4.50; 95% CI, −6.56 to −2.44; P<0.0001), better respiratory system compliance on day 3 (202 patients; MD, 8.19; 95% CI, 0.84–15.54; P=0.03), arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on day 3 (294 patients; MD, 44.40; 95% CI, 16.05–72.76; P=0.002), and higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) on day 3 (285 patients; MD, 4.18; 95% CI, 3.10–5.25; P<0.00001). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of pneumothorax (170 patients; OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.12–1.34; P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis showed that APRV could reduce hospital mortality, duration of ventilation and ICU stay, improve lung compliance, oxygenation index, and MAP compared with LTVV for patients with ARDS. We found APRV to be a safe and effective ventilation mode for patients with ARDS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7812231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78122312021-01-22 Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Zhong, Xi Wu, Qin Yang, Hao Dong, Wei Wang, Bo Zhang, Zhongwei Liang, Guopeng Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is better than low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare APRV and LTVV on patients with ARDS. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes in ARDS ventilator therapy with APRV or LTVV were identified using Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and The Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database (SinoMed) from inception to March 2019. RESULTS: A total of 7 RCTs with a 405 patients were eligible for our meta-analysis. The results revealed that APRV was associated with lower hospital mortality [405 patients; odds ratio (OR), 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37–0.88; P=0.01], a shorter time of ventilator therapy [373 patients; mean difference (MD), 5.36; 95% CI, 1.99–8.73; P=0.002], and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (315 patients; MD, −4.50; 95% CI, −6.56 to −2.44; P<0.0001), better respiratory system compliance on day 3 (202 patients; MD, 8.19; 95% CI, 0.84–15.54; P=0.03), arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on day 3 (294 patients; MD, 44.40; 95% CI, 16.05–72.76; P=0.002), and higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) on day 3 (285 patients; MD, 4.18; 95% CI, 3.10–5.25; P<0.00001). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of pneumothorax (170 patients; OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.12–1.34; P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis showed that APRV could reduce hospital mortality, duration of ventilation and ICU stay, improve lung compliance, oxygenation index, and MAP compared with LTVV for patients with ARDS. We found APRV to be a safe and effective ventilation mode for patients with ARDS. AME Publishing Company 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7812231/ /pubmed/33490153 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6917 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhong, Xi
Wu, Qin
Yang, Hao
Dong, Wei
Wang, Bo
Zhang, Zhongwei
Liang, Guopeng
Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_full Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_fullStr Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_short Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_sort airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33490153
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6917
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongxi airwaypressurereleaseventilationversuslowtidalvolumeventilationforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeacutelunginjuryametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT wuqin airwaypressurereleaseventilationversuslowtidalvolumeventilationforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeacutelunginjuryametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT yanghao airwaypressurereleaseventilationversuslowtidalvolumeventilationforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeacutelunginjuryametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT dongwei airwaypressurereleaseventilationversuslowtidalvolumeventilationforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeacutelunginjuryametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT wangbo airwaypressurereleaseventilationversuslowtidalvolumeventilationforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeacutelunginjuryametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT zhangzhongwei airwaypressurereleaseventilationversuslowtidalvolumeventilationforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeacutelunginjuryametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT liangguopeng airwaypressurereleaseventilationversuslowtidalvolumeventilationforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeacutelunginjuryametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials