Cargando…
Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is better than low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare APRV and LTVV on patients with ARDS. METHODS: Randomized co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33490153 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6917 |
_version_ | 1783637625700089856 |
---|---|
author | Zhong, Xi Wu, Qin Yang, Hao Dong, Wei Wang, Bo Zhang, Zhongwei Liang, Guopeng |
author_facet | Zhong, Xi Wu, Qin Yang, Hao Dong, Wei Wang, Bo Zhang, Zhongwei Liang, Guopeng |
author_sort | Zhong, Xi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is better than low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare APRV and LTVV on patients with ARDS. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes in ARDS ventilator therapy with APRV or LTVV were identified using Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and The Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database (SinoMed) from inception to March 2019. RESULTS: A total of 7 RCTs with a 405 patients were eligible for our meta-analysis. The results revealed that APRV was associated with lower hospital mortality [405 patients; odds ratio (OR), 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37–0.88; P=0.01], a shorter time of ventilator therapy [373 patients; mean difference (MD), 5.36; 95% CI, 1.99–8.73; P=0.002], and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (315 patients; MD, −4.50; 95% CI, −6.56 to −2.44; P<0.0001), better respiratory system compliance on day 3 (202 patients; MD, 8.19; 95% CI, 0.84–15.54; P=0.03), arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on day 3 (294 patients; MD, 44.40; 95% CI, 16.05–72.76; P=0.002), and higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) on day 3 (285 patients; MD, 4.18; 95% CI, 3.10–5.25; P<0.00001). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of pneumothorax (170 patients; OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.12–1.34; P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis showed that APRV could reduce hospital mortality, duration of ventilation and ICU stay, improve lung compliance, oxygenation index, and MAP compared with LTVV for patients with ARDS. We found APRV to be a safe and effective ventilation mode for patients with ARDS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7812231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78122312021-01-22 Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Zhong, Xi Wu, Qin Yang, Hao Dong, Wei Wang, Bo Zhang, Zhongwei Liang, Guopeng Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is better than low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare APRV and LTVV on patients with ARDS. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes in ARDS ventilator therapy with APRV or LTVV were identified using Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and The Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database (SinoMed) from inception to March 2019. RESULTS: A total of 7 RCTs with a 405 patients were eligible for our meta-analysis. The results revealed that APRV was associated with lower hospital mortality [405 patients; odds ratio (OR), 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37–0.88; P=0.01], a shorter time of ventilator therapy [373 patients; mean difference (MD), 5.36; 95% CI, 1.99–8.73; P=0.002], and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (315 patients; MD, −4.50; 95% CI, −6.56 to −2.44; P<0.0001), better respiratory system compliance on day 3 (202 patients; MD, 8.19; 95% CI, 0.84–15.54; P=0.03), arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on day 3 (294 patients; MD, 44.40; 95% CI, 16.05–72.76; P=0.002), and higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) on day 3 (285 patients; MD, 4.18; 95% CI, 3.10–5.25; P<0.00001). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of pneumothorax (170 patients; OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.12–1.34; P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis showed that APRV could reduce hospital mortality, duration of ventilation and ICU stay, improve lung compliance, oxygenation index, and MAP compared with LTVV for patients with ARDS. We found APRV to be a safe and effective ventilation mode for patients with ARDS. AME Publishing Company 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7812231/ /pubmed/33490153 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6917 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhong, Xi Wu, Qin Yang, Hao Dong, Wei Wang, Bo Zhang, Zhongwei Liang, Guopeng Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title | Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_full | Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_short | Airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_sort | airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33490153 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6917 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhongxi airwaypressurereleaseventilationversuslowtidalvolumeventilationforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeacutelunginjuryametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT wuqin airwaypressurereleaseventilationversuslowtidalvolumeventilationforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeacutelunginjuryametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT yanghao airwaypressurereleaseventilationversuslowtidalvolumeventilationforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeacutelunginjuryametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT dongwei airwaypressurereleaseventilationversuslowtidalvolumeventilationforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeacutelunginjuryametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT wangbo airwaypressurereleaseventilationversuslowtidalvolumeventilationforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeacutelunginjuryametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT zhangzhongwei airwaypressurereleaseventilationversuslowtidalvolumeventilationforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeacutelunginjuryametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT liangguopeng airwaypressurereleaseventilationversuslowtidalvolumeventilationforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeacutelunginjuryametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials |