Cargando…
A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples
PURPOSE: Whatman™ 903 cards represent a valid type of support for collection, storage, and analysis of dried blood spots (DBS). Whatman™ FTA (Flinders Technology Associates) are a type of cards soaked in chemicals that cause denaturation of proteins, while preserving DNA and ensuring the safe handli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33488834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11419-020-00567-2 |
_version_ | 1783637650745327616 |
---|---|
author | Moretti, Matteo Manfredi, Alessandro Freni, Francesca Previderé, Carlo Osculati, Antonio Marco Maria Grignani, Pierangela Tronconi, Livio Carelli, Claudia Vignali, Claudia Morini, Luca |
author_facet | Moretti, Matteo Manfredi, Alessandro Freni, Francesca Previderé, Carlo Osculati, Antonio Marco Maria Grignani, Pierangela Tronconi, Livio Carelli, Claudia Vignali, Claudia Morini, Luca |
author_sort | Moretti, Matteo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Whatman™ 903 cards represent a valid type of support for collection, storage, and analysis of dried blood spots (DBS). Whatman™ FTA (Flinders Technology Associates) are a type of cards soaked in chemicals that cause denaturation of proteins, while preserving DNA and ensuring the safe handling of DBS; to date, these cards are still rarely employed in forensic toxicology. The aim of this study was to analyze several psychoactive substances on not-dried blood on the two different cards and to compare the qualitative and quantitative results. METHODS: Twenty cardiac postmortem blood samples were collected and deposed on Whatman™ 903 and Whatman™ FTA cards. Spots and not-dried blood were analyzed following our validated and previously published liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry methods. RESULTS: We were able to identify: eight drugs of abuse and their metabolites (15 cases), five benzodiazepines and their metabolites (3 cases), six antidepressants (6 cases) and two antipsychotics (3 cases). We observed a perfect qualitative correspondence and a general good quantitative correlation between data obtained from not-dried blood and the two different DBS cards, except for alprazolam, diazepam, desmethyldiazepam, fluoxetine and sertraline, that showed a lower concentration on FTA. Additional experiments suggest that the chemicals, adsorbed on FTA, are not the cause of the loss of signal observed for the substances previously mentioned and that methanol should be preferred as extraction solvent. CONCLUSIONS: This study proved that FTA cards are a good and a hazard-free alternative sample storage method for analysis of several psychoactive substances in postmortem blood. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11419-020-00567-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7812343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78123432021-01-18 A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples Moretti, Matteo Manfredi, Alessandro Freni, Francesca Previderé, Carlo Osculati, Antonio Marco Maria Grignani, Pierangela Tronconi, Livio Carelli, Claudia Vignali, Claudia Morini, Luca Forensic Toxicol Original Article PURPOSE: Whatman™ 903 cards represent a valid type of support for collection, storage, and analysis of dried blood spots (DBS). Whatman™ FTA (Flinders Technology Associates) are a type of cards soaked in chemicals that cause denaturation of proteins, while preserving DNA and ensuring the safe handling of DBS; to date, these cards are still rarely employed in forensic toxicology. The aim of this study was to analyze several psychoactive substances on not-dried blood on the two different cards and to compare the qualitative and quantitative results. METHODS: Twenty cardiac postmortem blood samples were collected and deposed on Whatman™ 903 and Whatman™ FTA cards. Spots and not-dried blood were analyzed following our validated and previously published liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry methods. RESULTS: We were able to identify: eight drugs of abuse and their metabolites (15 cases), five benzodiazepines and their metabolites (3 cases), six antidepressants (6 cases) and two antipsychotics (3 cases). We observed a perfect qualitative correspondence and a general good quantitative correlation between data obtained from not-dried blood and the two different DBS cards, except for alprazolam, diazepam, desmethyldiazepam, fluoxetine and sertraline, that showed a lower concentration on FTA. Additional experiments suggest that the chemicals, adsorbed on FTA, are not the cause of the loss of signal observed for the substances previously mentioned and that methanol should be preferred as extraction solvent. CONCLUSIONS: This study proved that FTA cards are a good and a hazard-free alternative sample storage method for analysis of several psychoactive substances in postmortem blood. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11419-020-00567-2. Springer Singapore 2021-01-18 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7812343/ /pubmed/33488834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11419-020-00567-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Moretti, Matteo Manfredi, Alessandro Freni, Francesca Previderé, Carlo Osculati, Antonio Marco Maria Grignani, Pierangela Tronconi, Livio Carelli, Claudia Vignali, Claudia Morini, Luca A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples |
title | A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples |
title_full | A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples |
title_fullStr | A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples |
title_short | A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples |
title_sort | comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33488834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11419-020-00567-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morettimatteo acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT manfredialessandro acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT frenifrancesca acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT previderecarlo acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT osculatiantoniomarcomaria acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT grignanipierangela acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT tronconilivio acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT carelliclaudia acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT vignaliclaudia acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT moriniluca acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT morettimatteo comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT manfredialessandro comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT frenifrancesca comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT previderecarlo comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT osculatiantoniomarcomaria comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT grignanipierangela comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT tronconilivio comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT carelliclaudia comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT vignaliclaudia comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples AT moriniluca comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples |