Cargando…

A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples

PURPOSE: Whatman™ 903 cards represent a valid type of support for collection, storage, and analysis of dried blood spots (DBS). Whatman™ FTA (Flinders Technology Associates) are a type of cards soaked in chemicals that cause denaturation of proteins, while preserving DNA and ensuring the safe handli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moretti, Matteo, Manfredi, Alessandro, Freni, Francesca, Previderé, Carlo, Osculati, Antonio Marco Maria, Grignani, Pierangela, Tronconi, Livio, Carelli, Claudia, Vignali, Claudia, Morini, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33488834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11419-020-00567-2
_version_ 1783637650745327616
author Moretti, Matteo
Manfredi, Alessandro
Freni, Francesca
Previderé, Carlo
Osculati, Antonio Marco Maria
Grignani, Pierangela
Tronconi, Livio
Carelli, Claudia
Vignali, Claudia
Morini, Luca
author_facet Moretti, Matteo
Manfredi, Alessandro
Freni, Francesca
Previderé, Carlo
Osculati, Antonio Marco Maria
Grignani, Pierangela
Tronconi, Livio
Carelli, Claudia
Vignali, Claudia
Morini, Luca
author_sort Moretti, Matteo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Whatman™ 903 cards represent a valid type of support for collection, storage, and analysis of dried blood spots (DBS). Whatman™ FTA (Flinders Technology Associates) are a type of cards soaked in chemicals that cause denaturation of proteins, while preserving DNA and ensuring the safe handling of DBS; to date, these cards are still rarely employed in forensic toxicology. The aim of this study was to analyze several psychoactive substances on not-dried blood on the two different cards and to compare the qualitative and quantitative results. METHODS: Twenty cardiac postmortem blood samples were collected and deposed on Whatman™ 903 and Whatman™ FTA cards. Spots and not-dried blood were analyzed following our validated and previously published liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry methods. RESULTS: We were able to identify: eight drugs of abuse and their metabolites (15 cases), five benzodiazepines and their metabolites (3 cases), six antidepressants (6 cases) and two antipsychotics (3 cases). We observed a perfect qualitative correspondence and a general good quantitative correlation between data obtained from not-dried blood and the two different DBS cards, except for alprazolam, diazepam, desmethyldiazepam, fluoxetine and sertraline, that showed a lower concentration on FTA. Additional experiments suggest that the chemicals, adsorbed on FTA, are not the cause of the loss of signal observed for the substances previously mentioned and that methanol should be preferred as extraction solvent. CONCLUSIONS: This study proved that FTA cards are a good and a hazard-free alternative sample storage method for analysis of several psychoactive substances in postmortem blood. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11419-020-00567-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7812343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78123432021-01-18 A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples Moretti, Matteo Manfredi, Alessandro Freni, Francesca Previderé, Carlo Osculati, Antonio Marco Maria Grignani, Pierangela Tronconi, Livio Carelli, Claudia Vignali, Claudia Morini, Luca Forensic Toxicol Original Article PURPOSE: Whatman™ 903 cards represent a valid type of support for collection, storage, and analysis of dried blood spots (DBS). Whatman™ FTA (Flinders Technology Associates) are a type of cards soaked in chemicals that cause denaturation of proteins, while preserving DNA and ensuring the safe handling of DBS; to date, these cards are still rarely employed in forensic toxicology. The aim of this study was to analyze several psychoactive substances on not-dried blood on the two different cards and to compare the qualitative and quantitative results. METHODS: Twenty cardiac postmortem blood samples were collected and deposed on Whatman™ 903 and Whatman™ FTA cards. Spots and not-dried blood were analyzed following our validated and previously published liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry methods. RESULTS: We were able to identify: eight drugs of abuse and their metabolites (15 cases), five benzodiazepines and their metabolites (3 cases), six antidepressants (6 cases) and two antipsychotics (3 cases). We observed a perfect qualitative correspondence and a general good quantitative correlation between data obtained from not-dried blood and the two different DBS cards, except for alprazolam, diazepam, desmethyldiazepam, fluoxetine and sertraline, that showed a lower concentration on FTA. Additional experiments suggest that the chemicals, adsorbed on FTA, are not the cause of the loss of signal observed for the substances previously mentioned and that methanol should be preferred as extraction solvent. CONCLUSIONS: This study proved that FTA cards are a good and a hazard-free alternative sample storage method for analysis of several psychoactive substances in postmortem blood. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11419-020-00567-2. Springer Singapore 2021-01-18 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7812343/ /pubmed/33488834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11419-020-00567-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Moretti, Matteo
Manfredi, Alessandro
Freni, Francesca
Previderé, Carlo
Osculati, Antonio Marco Maria
Grignani, Pierangela
Tronconi, Livio
Carelli, Claudia
Vignali, Claudia
Morini, Luca
A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples
title A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples
title_full A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples
title_fullStr A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples
title_short A comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples
title_sort comparison between two different dried blood substrates in determination of psychoactive substances in postmortem samples
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33488834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11419-020-00567-2
work_keys_str_mv AT morettimatteo acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT manfredialessandro acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT frenifrancesca acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT previderecarlo acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT osculatiantoniomarcomaria acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT grignanipierangela acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT tronconilivio acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT carelliclaudia acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT vignaliclaudia acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT moriniluca acomparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT morettimatteo comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT manfredialessandro comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT frenifrancesca comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT previderecarlo comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT osculatiantoniomarcomaria comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT grignanipierangela comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT tronconilivio comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT carelliclaudia comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT vignaliclaudia comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples
AT moriniluca comparisonbetweentwodifferentdriedbloodsubstratesindeterminationofpsychoactivesubstancesinpostmortemsamples