Cargando…

Active listening

This paper introduces active listening, as a unified framework for synthesising and recognising speech. The notion of active listening inherits from active inference, which considers perception and action under one universal imperative: to maximise the evidence for our (generative) models of the wor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friston, Karl J., Sajid, Noor, Quiroga-Martinez, David Ricardo, Parr, Thomas, Price, Cathy J., Holmes, Emma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32732017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2020.107998
_version_ 1783637656935071744
author Friston, Karl J.
Sajid, Noor
Quiroga-Martinez, David Ricardo
Parr, Thomas
Price, Cathy J.
Holmes, Emma
author_facet Friston, Karl J.
Sajid, Noor
Quiroga-Martinez, David Ricardo
Parr, Thomas
Price, Cathy J.
Holmes, Emma
author_sort Friston, Karl J.
collection PubMed
description This paper introduces active listening, as a unified framework for synthesising and recognising speech. The notion of active listening inherits from active inference, which considers perception and action under one universal imperative: to maximise the evidence for our (generative) models of the world. First, we describe a generative model of spoken words that simulates (i) how discrete lexical, prosodic, and speaker attributes give rise to continuous acoustic signals; and conversely (ii) how continuous acoustic signals are recognised as words. The ‘active’ aspect involves (covertly) segmenting spoken sentences and borrows ideas from active vision. It casts speech segmentation as the selection of internal actions, corresponding to the placement of word boundaries. Practically, word boundaries are selected that maximise the evidence for an internal model of how individual words are generated. We establish face validity by simulating speech recognition and showing how the inferred content of a sentence depends on prior beliefs and background noise. Finally, we consider predictive validity by associating neuronal or physiological responses, such as the mismatch negativity and P300, with belief updating under active listening, which is greatest in the absence of accurate prior beliefs about what will be heard next.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7812378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78123782021-01-22 Active listening Friston, Karl J. Sajid, Noor Quiroga-Martinez, David Ricardo Parr, Thomas Price, Cathy J. Holmes, Emma Hear Res Technical Note This paper introduces active listening, as a unified framework for synthesising and recognising speech. The notion of active listening inherits from active inference, which considers perception and action under one universal imperative: to maximise the evidence for our (generative) models of the world. First, we describe a generative model of spoken words that simulates (i) how discrete lexical, prosodic, and speaker attributes give rise to continuous acoustic signals; and conversely (ii) how continuous acoustic signals are recognised as words. The ‘active’ aspect involves (covertly) segmenting spoken sentences and borrows ideas from active vision. It casts speech segmentation as the selection of internal actions, corresponding to the placement of word boundaries. Practically, word boundaries are selected that maximise the evidence for an internal model of how individual words are generated. We establish face validity by simulating speech recognition and showing how the inferred content of a sentence depends on prior beliefs and background noise. Finally, we consider predictive validity by associating neuronal or physiological responses, such as the mismatch negativity and P300, with belief updating under active listening, which is greatest in the absence of accurate prior beliefs about what will be heard next. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7812378/ /pubmed/32732017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2020.107998 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Technical Note
Friston, Karl J.
Sajid, Noor
Quiroga-Martinez, David Ricardo
Parr, Thomas
Price, Cathy J.
Holmes, Emma
Active listening
title Active listening
title_full Active listening
title_fullStr Active listening
title_full_unstemmed Active listening
title_short Active listening
title_sort active listening
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32732017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2020.107998
work_keys_str_mv AT fristonkarlj activelistening
AT sajidnoor activelistening
AT quirogamartinezdavidricardo activelistening
AT parrthomas activelistening
AT pricecathyj activelistening
AT holmesemma activelistening