Cargando…

Treatment options for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Where are we now?

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a spectrum of clonal stem-cell disorders characterized clinically by bone-marrow failure. Resultant cytopenias are responsible for significant mortality and decreased quality of life in patients with MDS. In patients with low-risk MDS (LR-MDS), anemia is the most...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volpe, Virginia O., Komrokji, Rami S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620720986641
_version_ 1783637661115744256
author Volpe, Virginia O.
Komrokji, Rami S.
author_facet Volpe, Virginia O.
Komrokji, Rami S.
author_sort Volpe, Virginia O.
collection PubMed
description Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a spectrum of clonal stem-cell disorders characterized clinically by bone-marrow failure. Resultant cytopenias are responsible for significant mortality and decreased quality of life in patients with MDS. In patients with low-risk MDS (LR-MDS), anemia is the most common cytopenia and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) are usually used as first-line therapy. Those patients who become refractory to ESA have a poor survival. Available treatment options such as lenalidomide, hypomethylating agents, and immunosuppressive therapy can provide some hematologic response among selected subsets of patients, however durable responses are limited, and these agents can carry significant adverse effects. Chronic transfusions help to alleviate symptoms of anemia but still carry risks associated with transfusion and iron overload. Luspatercept, recently approved for those LR-MDS with ring sideroblasts refractory to ESA, was found to have an improvement in transfusion independence with a well-tolerated safety profile. While anemia is the most common cytopenia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia management is challenging and the co-occurrence of these cytopenias with anemia may dictate the choice of therapy. In this article, we review LR-MDS and discuss the optimal use of current treatment options and explore new therapeutic options on the horizon.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7812395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78123952021-01-26 Treatment options for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Where are we now? Volpe, Virginia O. Komrokji, Rami S. Ther Adv Hematol Review Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a spectrum of clonal stem-cell disorders characterized clinically by bone-marrow failure. Resultant cytopenias are responsible for significant mortality and decreased quality of life in patients with MDS. In patients with low-risk MDS (LR-MDS), anemia is the most common cytopenia and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) are usually used as first-line therapy. Those patients who become refractory to ESA have a poor survival. Available treatment options such as lenalidomide, hypomethylating agents, and immunosuppressive therapy can provide some hematologic response among selected subsets of patients, however durable responses are limited, and these agents can carry significant adverse effects. Chronic transfusions help to alleviate symptoms of anemia but still carry risks associated with transfusion and iron overload. Luspatercept, recently approved for those LR-MDS with ring sideroblasts refractory to ESA, was found to have an improvement in transfusion independence with a well-tolerated safety profile. While anemia is the most common cytopenia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia management is challenging and the co-occurrence of these cytopenias with anemia may dictate the choice of therapy. In this article, we review LR-MDS and discuss the optimal use of current treatment options and explore new therapeutic options on the horizon. SAGE Publications 2021-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7812395/ /pubmed/33505645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620720986641 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Volpe, Virginia O.
Komrokji, Rami S.
Treatment options for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Where are we now?
title Treatment options for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Where are we now?
title_full Treatment options for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Where are we now?
title_fullStr Treatment options for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Where are we now?
title_full_unstemmed Treatment options for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Where are we now?
title_short Treatment options for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Where are we now?
title_sort treatment options for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. where are we now?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620720986641
work_keys_str_mv AT volpevirginiao treatmentoptionsforlowerriskmyelodysplasticsyndromeswherearewenow
AT komrokjiramis treatmentoptionsforlowerriskmyelodysplasticsyndromeswherearewenow