Cargando…

A 16-year Survey of Clinicopathological Findings, Electron Microscopy, and Classification of Renal Amyloidosis

BACKGROUND: Electron microscopy (EM) is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of renal amyloidosis, particularly in the early stages of the disease. In Iran, studies on EM and the clinical features of renal amyloidosis are scarce. The objective of the present study was to survey EM investigations, pathol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owji, Seyed Mohammad, Raeisi Shahraki, Hadi, Owji, Seyed Hossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487790
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/ijms.2019.82110.
_version_ 1783637681206460416
author Owji, Seyed Mohammad
Raeisi Shahraki, Hadi
Owji, Seyed Hossein
author_facet Owji, Seyed Mohammad
Raeisi Shahraki, Hadi
Owji, Seyed Hossein
author_sort Owji, Seyed Mohammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electron microscopy (EM) is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of renal amyloidosis, particularly in the early stages of the disease. In Iran, studies on EM and the clinical features of renal amyloidosis are scarce. The objective of the present study was to survey EM investigations, pathological classifications, and clinical features of renal amyloidosis. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed in Shiraz, Iran, during 2001-2016. Out of 2,770 kidney biopsies, 27 cases with a diagnosis of renal amyloidosis were investigated. EM investigation and six staining procedures for light microscopy (LM) were performed. Two pathological classifications based on glomerular, peritubular, perivascular, and interstitial involvement were made. Finally, the association between these classifications and the clinical features was assessed. Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, Independent t test, and Multiple logistic regression analysis were used. P values<0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In 51.9% of the cases, the clinical diagnosis was nephrotic syndrome. Proteinuria and edema were the most prevalent clinical manifestations. The role of EM investigation for diagnosis was graded “necessary” or “supportive” in 48.2% of the patients. In the classification based on glomerular classes, variables such as the mean blood pressure (P=0.003), history of hypertension (P=0.02), creatinine >1.5 (P=0.03), and severe tubular atrophy (P=0.03) were significantly higher in class B (advanced amyloid depositions). CONCLUSION: EM plays an important role in the diagnosis of renal amyloidosis. EM in conjunction with LM investigation with Congo red staining is recommended, to prevent misdiagnosis of patients with a clinical suspicion of renal amyloidosis. Among different pathological features of renal amyloidosis, the severity of glomerular amyloid depositions had a clear relationship with clinical presentations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7812497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78124972021-01-22 A 16-year Survey of Clinicopathological Findings, Electron Microscopy, and Classification of Renal Amyloidosis Owji, Seyed Mohammad Raeisi Shahraki, Hadi Owji, Seyed Hossein Iran J Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Electron microscopy (EM) is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of renal amyloidosis, particularly in the early stages of the disease. In Iran, studies on EM and the clinical features of renal amyloidosis are scarce. The objective of the present study was to survey EM investigations, pathological classifications, and clinical features of renal amyloidosis. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed in Shiraz, Iran, during 2001-2016. Out of 2,770 kidney biopsies, 27 cases with a diagnosis of renal amyloidosis were investigated. EM investigation and six staining procedures for light microscopy (LM) were performed. Two pathological classifications based on glomerular, peritubular, perivascular, and interstitial involvement were made. Finally, the association between these classifications and the clinical features was assessed. Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, Independent t test, and Multiple logistic regression analysis were used. P values<0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In 51.9% of the cases, the clinical diagnosis was nephrotic syndrome. Proteinuria and edema were the most prevalent clinical manifestations. The role of EM investigation for diagnosis was graded “necessary” or “supportive” in 48.2% of the patients. In the classification based on glomerular classes, variables such as the mean blood pressure (P=0.003), history of hypertension (P=0.02), creatinine >1.5 (P=0.03), and severe tubular atrophy (P=0.03) were significantly higher in class B (advanced amyloid depositions). CONCLUSION: EM plays an important role in the diagnosis of renal amyloidosis. EM in conjunction with LM investigation with Congo red staining is recommended, to prevent misdiagnosis of patients with a clinical suspicion of renal amyloidosis. Among different pathological features of renal amyloidosis, the severity of glomerular amyloid depositions had a clear relationship with clinical presentations. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7812497/ /pubmed/33487790 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/ijms.2019.82110. Text en Copyright: © Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Owji, Seyed Mohammad
Raeisi Shahraki, Hadi
Owji, Seyed Hossein
A 16-year Survey of Clinicopathological Findings, Electron Microscopy, and Classification of Renal Amyloidosis
title A 16-year Survey of Clinicopathological Findings, Electron Microscopy, and Classification of Renal Amyloidosis
title_full A 16-year Survey of Clinicopathological Findings, Electron Microscopy, and Classification of Renal Amyloidosis
title_fullStr A 16-year Survey of Clinicopathological Findings, Electron Microscopy, and Classification of Renal Amyloidosis
title_full_unstemmed A 16-year Survey of Clinicopathological Findings, Electron Microscopy, and Classification of Renal Amyloidosis
title_short A 16-year Survey of Clinicopathological Findings, Electron Microscopy, and Classification of Renal Amyloidosis
title_sort 16-year survey of clinicopathological findings, electron microscopy, and classification of renal amyloidosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487790
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/ijms.2019.82110.
work_keys_str_mv AT owjiseyedmohammad a16yearsurveyofclinicopathologicalfindingselectronmicroscopyandclassificationofrenalamyloidosis
AT raeisishahrakihadi a16yearsurveyofclinicopathologicalfindingselectronmicroscopyandclassificationofrenalamyloidosis
AT owjiseyedhossein a16yearsurveyofclinicopathologicalfindingselectronmicroscopyandclassificationofrenalamyloidosis
AT owjiseyedmohammad 16yearsurveyofclinicopathologicalfindingselectronmicroscopyandclassificationofrenalamyloidosis
AT raeisishahrakihadi 16yearsurveyofclinicopathologicalfindingselectronmicroscopyandclassificationofrenalamyloidosis
AT owjiseyedhossein 16yearsurveyofclinicopathologicalfindingselectronmicroscopyandclassificationofrenalamyloidosis