Cargando…

Validation of a novel UPLC-HRMS method for human whole-blood cyclosporine and comparison with a CMIA immunoassay

Therapeutic drug monitoring is an essential tool when managing the therapeutic use of immunosuppressant cyclosporine A (CsA) in cases with solid organ transplantation. In China, the concentration of CsA is primarily measured using immunoassays. However, existing literature recommends mass spectromet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xiaoxue, Qin, Wei, Chen, Wenqian, Liu, Huifang, Zhang, Dan, Zhang, Xianglin, Li, Pengmei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33488800
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9623
_version_ 1783637702265012224
author Wang, Xiaoxue
Qin, Wei
Chen, Wenqian
Liu, Huifang
Zhang, Dan
Zhang, Xianglin
Li, Pengmei
author_facet Wang, Xiaoxue
Qin, Wei
Chen, Wenqian
Liu, Huifang
Zhang, Dan
Zhang, Xianglin
Li, Pengmei
author_sort Wang, Xiaoxue
collection PubMed
description Therapeutic drug monitoring is an essential tool when managing the therapeutic use of immunosuppressant cyclosporine A (CsA) in cases with solid organ transplantation. In China, the concentration of CsA is primarily measured using immunoassays. However, existing literature recommends mass spectrometry as the current gold standard for the quantitation of CsA. In the present study, it was attempted to develop a novel application to determine CsA concentrations by using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS). This technique was then compared with a commercially available chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) and it was investigated how clinical factors may contribute to quantitation differences between the two methods. An UPLC-Orbitrap-MS method was developed to determine CsA concentrations and this method was validated using guidelines put forward by the Food and Drug Administration from the US. In total, 127 blood samples were acquired from patients undergoing kidney transplantation and analyzed by UPLC-HRMS and CMIA assays. The novel method provided sensitive, accurate and precise results. The mean CsA concentration measured by CMIA was significantly higher than that measured by UPLC-HRMS (85.70±48.99 vs. 67.06±34.56 ng/ml, P<0.0001). Passing Bablok analysis yielded a slope of 1.34 (95% CI: 1.22-1.47) and an intercept of -2.54 (95% CI: -10.29-5.52). A group of samples with a higher metabolic ratio (hydroxylated CsA/CsA>1) exhibited larger discrepancies, while a group of samples taken from patients with a longer post-transplantation time (>10 years) featured narrow 95% CIs from -15.32 to 65.69%, as determined by Bland-Altman analysis. In summary, a reliable, accurate and rapid UPLC-HRMS method for CsA analysis was successfully developed. The measurement of CsA by the CMIA assay in renal transplant patients should be further evaluated with a specific focus on positive bias.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7812591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78125912021-01-22 Validation of a novel UPLC-HRMS method for human whole-blood cyclosporine and comparison with a CMIA immunoassay Wang, Xiaoxue Qin, Wei Chen, Wenqian Liu, Huifang Zhang, Dan Zhang, Xianglin Li, Pengmei Exp Ther Med Articles Therapeutic drug monitoring is an essential tool when managing the therapeutic use of immunosuppressant cyclosporine A (CsA) in cases with solid organ transplantation. In China, the concentration of CsA is primarily measured using immunoassays. However, existing literature recommends mass spectrometry as the current gold standard for the quantitation of CsA. In the present study, it was attempted to develop a novel application to determine CsA concentrations by using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS). This technique was then compared with a commercially available chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) and it was investigated how clinical factors may contribute to quantitation differences between the two methods. An UPLC-Orbitrap-MS method was developed to determine CsA concentrations and this method was validated using guidelines put forward by the Food and Drug Administration from the US. In total, 127 blood samples were acquired from patients undergoing kidney transplantation and analyzed by UPLC-HRMS and CMIA assays. The novel method provided sensitive, accurate and precise results. The mean CsA concentration measured by CMIA was significantly higher than that measured by UPLC-HRMS (85.70±48.99 vs. 67.06±34.56 ng/ml, P<0.0001). Passing Bablok analysis yielded a slope of 1.34 (95% CI: 1.22-1.47) and an intercept of -2.54 (95% CI: -10.29-5.52). A group of samples with a higher metabolic ratio (hydroxylated CsA/CsA>1) exhibited larger discrepancies, while a group of samples taken from patients with a longer post-transplantation time (>10 years) featured narrow 95% CIs from -15.32 to 65.69%, as determined by Bland-Altman analysis. In summary, a reliable, accurate and rapid UPLC-HRMS method for CsA analysis was successfully developed. The measurement of CsA by the CMIA assay in renal transplant patients should be further evaluated with a specific focus on positive bias. D.A. Spandidos 2021-03 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7812591/ /pubmed/33488800 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9623 Text en Copyright: © Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Wang, Xiaoxue
Qin, Wei
Chen, Wenqian
Liu, Huifang
Zhang, Dan
Zhang, Xianglin
Li, Pengmei
Validation of a novel UPLC-HRMS method for human whole-blood cyclosporine and comparison with a CMIA immunoassay
title Validation of a novel UPLC-HRMS method for human whole-blood cyclosporine and comparison with a CMIA immunoassay
title_full Validation of a novel UPLC-HRMS method for human whole-blood cyclosporine and comparison with a CMIA immunoassay
title_fullStr Validation of a novel UPLC-HRMS method for human whole-blood cyclosporine and comparison with a CMIA immunoassay
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a novel UPLC-HRMS method for human whole-blood cyclosporine and comparison with a CMIA immunoassay
title_short Validation of a novel UPLC-HRMS method for human whole-blood cyclosporine and comparison with a CMIA immunoassay
title_sort validation of a novel uplc-hrms method for human whole-blood cyclosporine and comparison with a cmia immunoassay
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33488800
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9623
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxiaoxue validationofanoveluplchrmsmethodforhumanwholebloodcyclosporineandcomparisonwithacmiaimmunoassay
AT qinwei validationofanoveluplchrmsmethodforhumanwholebloodcyclosporineandcomparisonwithacmiaimmunoassay
AT chenwenqian validationofanoveluplchrmsmethodforhumanwholebloodcyclosporineandcomparisonwithacmiaimmunoassay
AT liuhuifang validationofanoveluplchrmsmethodforhumanwholebloodcyclosporineandcomparisonwithacmiaimmunoassay
AT zhangdan validationofanoveluplchrmsmethodforhumanwholebloodcyclosporineandcomparisonwithacmiaimmunoassay
AT zhangxianglin validationofanoveluplchrmsmethodforhumanwholebloodcyclosporineandcomparisonwithacmiaimmunoassay
AT lipengmei validationofanoveluplchrmsmethodforhumanwholebloodcyclosporineandcomparisonwithacmiaimmunoassay