Cargando…
Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain?
The past couple of decades produced a surge of interest in interaction synchrony. Moving from the study of behavioral coordination to investigating the coordination of psychophysiological and brain activity, relevant research has tackled a broad range of interactional settings with a multitude of me...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33104804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa148 |
_version_ | 1783637704989212672 |
---|---|
author | Schirmer, Annett Fairhurst, Merle Hoehl, Stefanie |
author_facet | Schirmer, Annett Fairhurst, Merle Hoehl, Stefanie |
author_sort | Schirmer, Annett |
collection | PubMed |
description | The past couple of decades produced a surge of interest in interaction synchrony. Moving from the study of behavioral coordination to investigating the coordination of psychophysiological and brain activity, relevant research has tackled a broad range of interactional settings with a multitude of measurement and analysis tools. This method diversity produced a host of interesting results converging on the fact that individuals engaged in social exchange tend to temporally align external as well as internal processes. Moreover, there appears to be a reciprocal relationship between the individuals’ affective bond and the extent of synchronization, which together benefit interaction outcomes. Notably, however, the current breadth of study approaches creates challenges for the field, including how to compare findings and how to develop a theoretical framework that unites and directs ongoing research efforts. More concerted efforts are called for to achieve the conceptual and methodological clarity needed to answer core questions and enabling a balanced pursuit of both synchronous and asynchronous processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7812616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78126162021-01-25 Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain? Schirmer, Annett Fairhurst, Merle Hoehl, Stefanie Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Editorial The past couple of decades produced a surge of interest in interaction synchrony. Moving from the study of behavioral coordination to investigating the coordination of psychophysiological and brain activity, relevant research has tackled a broad range of interactional settings with a multitude of measurement and analysis tools. This method diversity produced a host of interesting results converging on the fact that individuals engaged in social exchange tend to temporally align external as well as internal processes. Moreover, there appears to be a reciprocal relationship between the individuals’ affective bond and the extent of synchronization, which together benefit interaction outcomes. Notably, however, the current breadth of study approaches creates challenges for the field, including how to compare findings and how to develop a theoretical framework that unites and directs ongoing research efforts. More concerted efforts are called for to achieve the conceptual and methodological clarity needed to answer core questions and enabling a balanced pursuit of both synchronous and asynchronous processes. Oxford University Press 2020-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7812616/ /pubmed/33104804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa148 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Schirmer, Annett Fairhurst, Merle Hoehl, Stefanie Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain? |
title | Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain? |
title_full | Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain? |
title_fullStr | Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain? |
title_full_unstemmed | Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain? |
title_short | Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain? |
title_sort | being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain? |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33104804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa148 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schirmerannett beinginsyncisinteractionalsynchronythekeytounderstandingthesocialbrain AT fairhurstmerle beinginsyncisinteractionalsynchronythekeytounderstandingthesocialbrain AT hoehlstefanie beinginsyncisinteractionalsynchronythekeytounderstandingthesocialbrain |