Cargando…

Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain?

The past couple of decades produced a surge of interest in interaction synchrony. Moving from the study of behavioral coordination to investigating the coordination of psychophysiological and brain activity, relevant research has tackled a broad range of interactional settings with a multitude of me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schirmer, Annett, Fairhurst, Merle, Hoehl, Stefanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33104804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa148
_version_ 1783637704989212672
author Schirmer, Annett
Fairhurst, Merle
Hoehl, Stefanie
author_facet Schirmer, Annett
Fairhurst, Merle
Hoehl, Stefanie
author_sort Schirmer, Annett
collection PubMed
description The past couple of decades produced a surge of interest in interaction synchrony. Moving from the study of behavioral coordination to investigating the coordination of psychophysiological and brain activity, relevant research has tackled a broad range of interactional settings with a multitude of measurement and analysis tools. This method diversity produced a host of interesting results converging on the fact that individuals engaged in social exchange tend to temporally align external as well as internal processes. Moreover, there appears to be a reciprocal relationship between the individuals’ affective bond and the extent of synchronization, which together benefit interaction outcomes. Notably, however, the current breadth of study approaches creates challenges for the field, including how to compare findings and how to develop a theoretical framework that unites and directs ongoing research efforts. More concerted efforts are called for to achieve the conceptual and methodological clarity needed to answer core questions and enabling a balanced pursuit of both synchronous and asynchronous processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7812616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78126162021-01-25 Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain? Schirmer, Annett Fairhurst, Merle Hoehl, Stefanie Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Editorial The past couple of decades produced a surge of interest in interaction synchrony. Moving from the study of behavioral coordination to investigating the coordination of psychophysiological and brain activity, relevant research has tackled a broad range of interactional settings with a multitude of measurement and analysis tools. This method diversity produced a host of interesting results converging on the fact that individuals engaged in social exchange tend to temporally align external as well as internal processes. Moreover, there appears to be a reciprocal relationship between the individuals’ affective bond and the extent of synchronization, which together benefit interaction outcomes. Notably, however, the current breadth of study approaches creates challenges for the field, including how to compare findings and how to develop a theoretical framework that unites and directs ongoing research efforts. More concerted efforts are called for to achieve the conceptual and methodological clarity needed to answer core questions and enabling a balanced pursuit of both synchronous and asynchronous processes. Oxford University Press 2020-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7812616/ /pubmed/33104804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa148 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Editorial
Schirmer, Annett
Fairhurst, Merle
Hoehl, Stefanie
Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain?
title Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain?
title_full Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain?
title_fullStr Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain?
title_full_unstemmed Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain?
title_short Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain?
title_sort being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain?
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33104804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa148
work_keys_str_mv AT schirmerannett beinginsyncisinteractionalsynchronythekeytounderstandingthesocialbrain
AT fairhurstmerle beinginsyncisinteractionalsynchronythekeytounderstandingthesocialbrain
AT hoehlstefanie beinginsyncisinteractionalsynchronythekeytounderstandingthesocialbrain