Cargando…
Fertility education: what’s trending on Instagram
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, authorship, and types of fertility-related information shared on Instagram targeted toward a new patient interested in fertility options using hashtag and content analysis. Secondary outcomes included comparison of post content stratified by author type (physi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33461628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-021-00095-6 |
_version_ | 1783637711005941760 |
---|---|
author | Peyser, Alexandra Goldstein, Liat Mullin, Christine Goldman, Randi H. |
author_facet | Peyser, Alexandra Goldstein, Liat Mullin, Christine Goldman, Randi H. |
author_sort | Peyser, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, authorship, and types of fertility-related information shared on Instagram targeted toward a new patient interested in fertility options using hashtag and content analysis. Secondary outcomes included comparison of post content stratified by author type (physicians versus patients). METHODS: A list of ten hashtags consisting of fertility terms for the new patient was derived. Content analysis was performed in April 2019 on the top 50 and most recent 50 posts for each hashtag to determine authorship and content type. The distribution of fertility terms in posts made by physicians was compared to that of patients and differences in use of terms were analyzed. RESULTS: Our search yielded 3,393,636 posts. The two most popular hashtags were IVF (N = 912,049), and Infertility (N = 852,939). Authorship of the top posts for each hashtag (N = 1000) were as follows: patients (67 %), physicians (10 %), for-profit commercial groups (6.0 %), allied health professional (4.5 %), professional societies (1 %), and other (11 %). Of these posts, 60 % related to patient experiences, 10 % advertisements, 10 % outreach, and 8 % educational. Physicians were more likely to author posts related to oocyte cryopreservation compared to IVF, while patients were more likely to author posts about IVF (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Over 3 million posts related to fertility were authored on Instagram. A majority of fertility posts are being mobilized by patients to publicly display and share their personal experiences. Concurrent with the rising utilization of planned oocyte cryopreservation, there is a trend toward physicians educating their patients about the process using social media as a platform. Physician participation on social media may offer a low-cost platform for networking and connecting with patients. Future studies examining the educational quality of posts by author type should be explored. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7812639 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78126392021-01-19 Fertility education: what’s trending on Instagram Peyser, Alexandra Goldstein, Liat Mullin, Christine Goldman, Randi H. Fertil Res Pract Research Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, authorship, and types of fertility-related information shared on Instagram targeted toward a new patient interested in fertility options using hashtag and content analysis. Secondary outcomes included comparison of post content stratified by author type (physicians versus patients). METHODS: A list of ten hashtags consisting of fertility terms for the new patient was derived. Content analysis was performed in April 2019 on the top 50 and most recent 50 posts for each hashtag to determine authorship and content type. The distribution of fertility terms in posts made by physicians was compared to that of patients and differences in use of terms were analyzed. RESULTS: Our search yielded 3,393,636 posts. The two most popular hashtags were IVF (N = 912,049), and Infertility (N = 852,939). Authorship of the top posts for each hashtag (N = 1000) were as follows: patients (67 %), physicians (10 %), for-profit commercial groups (6.0 %), allied health professional (4.5 %), professional societies (1 %), and other (11 %). Of these posts, 60 % related to patient experiences, 10 % advertisements, 10 % outreach, and 8 % educational. Physicians were more likely to author posts related to oocyte cryopreservation compared to IVF, while patients were more likely to author posts about IVF (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Over 3 million posts related to fertility were authored on Instagram. A majority of fertility posts are being mobilized by patients to publicly display and share their personal experiences. Concurrent with the rising utilization of planned oocyte cryopreservation, there is a trend toward physicians educating their patients about the process using social media as a platform. Physician participation on social media may offer a low-cost platform for networking and connecting with patients. Future studies examining the educational quality of posts by author type should be explored. BioMed Central 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7812639/ /pubmed/33461628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-021-00095-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Peyser, Alexandra Goldstein, Liat Mullin, Christine Goldman, Randi H. Fertility education: what’s trending on Instagram |
title | Fertility education: what’s trending on Instagram |
title_full | Fertility education: what’s trending on Instagram |
title_fullStr | Fertility education: what’s trending on Instagram |
title_full_unstemmed | Fertility education: what’s trending on Instagram |
title_short | Fertility education: what’s trending on Instagram |
title_sort | fertility education: what’s trending on instagram |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33461628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-021-00095-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peyseralexandra fertilityeducationwhatstrendingoninstagram AT goldsteinliat fertilityeducationwhatstrendingoninstagram AT mullinchristine fertilityeducationwhatstrendingoninstagram AT goldmanrandih fertilityeducationwhatstrendingoninstagram |