Cargando…

A unified machine learning approach to time series forecasting applied to demand at emergency departments

BACKGROUND: There were 25.6 million attendances at Emergency Departments (EDs) in England in 2019 corresponding to an increase of 12 million attendances over the past ten years. The steadily rising demand at EDs creates a constant challenge to provide adequate quality of care while maintaining stand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vollmer, Michaela A.C., Glampson, Ben, Mellan, Thomas, Mishra, Swapnil, Mercuri, Luca, Costello, Ceire, Klaber, Robert, Cooke, Graham, Flaxman, Seth, Bhatt, Samir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33461485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00395-y
_version_ 1783637766897139712
author Vollmer, Michaela A.C.
Glampson, Ben
Mellan, Thomas
Mishra, Swapnil
Mercuri, Luca
Costello, Ceire
Klaber, Robert
Cooke, Graham
Flaxman, Seth
Bhatt, Samir
author_facet Vollmer, Michaela A.C.
Glampson, Ben
Mellan, Thomas
Mishra, Swapnil
Mercuri, Luca
Costello, Ceire
Klaber, Robert
Cooke, Graham
Flaxman, Seth
Bhatt, Samir
author_sort Vollmer, Michaela A.C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There were 25.6 million attendances at Emergency Departments (EDs) in England in 2019 corresponding to an increase of 12 million attendances over the past ten years. The steadily rising demand at EDs creates a constant challenge to provide adequate quality of care while maintaining standards and productivity. Managing hospital demand effectively requires an adequate knowledge of the future rate of admission. We develop a novel predictive framework to understand the temporal dynamics of hospital demand. METHODS: We compare and combine state-of-the-art forecasting methods to predict hospital demand 1, 3 or 7 days into the future. In particular, our analysis compares machine learning algorithms to more traditional linear models as measured in a mean absolute error (MAE) and we consider two different hyperparameter tuning methods, enabling a faster deployment of our models without compromising performance. We believe our framework can readily be used to forecast a wide range of policy relevant indicators. RESULTS: We find that linear models often outperform machine learning methods and that the quality of our predictions for any of the forecasting horizons of 1, 3 or 7 days are comparable as measured in MAE. Our approach is able to predict attendances at these emergency departments one day in advance up to a mean absolute error of ±14 and ±10 patients corresponding to a mean absolute percentage error of 6.8% and 8.6% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Simple linear methods like generalized linear models are often better or at least as good as ensemble learning methods like the gradient boosting or random forest algorithm. However, though sophisticated machine learning methods are not necessarily better than linear models, they improve the diversity of model predictions so that stacked predictions can be more robust than any single model including the best performing one.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7812986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78129862021-01-18 A unified machine learning approach to time series forecasting applied to demand at emergency departments Vollmer, Michaela A.C. Glampson, Ben Mellan, Thomas Mishra, Swapnil Mercuri, Luca Costello, Ceire Klaber, Robert Cooke, Graham Flaxman, Seth Bhatt, Samir BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: There were 25.6 million attendances at Emergency Departments (EDs) in England in 2019 corresponding to an increase of 12 million attendances over the past ten years. The steadily rising demand at EDs creates a constant challenge to provide adequate quality of care while maintaining standards and productivity. Managing hospital demand effectively requires an adequate knowledge of the future rate of admission. We develop a novel predictive framework to understand the temporal dynamics of hospital demand. METHODS: We compare and combine state-of-the-art forecasting methods to predict hospital demand 1, 3 or 7 days into the future. In particular, our analysis compares machine learning algorithms to more traditional linear models as measured in a mean absolute error (MAE) and we consider two different hyperparameter tuning methods, enabling a faster deployment of our models without compromising performance. We believe our framework can readily be used to forecast a wide range of policy relevant indicators. RESULTS: We find that linear models often outperform machine learning methods and that the quality of our predictions for any of the forecasting horizons of 1, 3 or 7 days are comparable as measured in MAE. Our approach is able to predict attendances at these emergency departments one day in advance up to a mean absolute error of ±14 and ±10 patients corresponding to a mean absolute percentage error of 6.8% and 8.6% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Simple linear methods like generalized linear models are often better or at least as good as ensemble learning methods like the gradient boosting or random forest algorithm. However, though sophisticated machine learning methods are not necessarily better than linear models, they improve the diversity of model predictions so that stacked predictions can be more robust than any single model including the best performing one. BioMed Central 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7812986/ /pubmed/33461485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00395-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vollmer, Michaela A.C.
Glampson, Ben
Mellan, Thomas
Mishra, Swapnil
Mercuri, Luca
Costello, Ceire
Klaber, Robert
Cooke, Graham
Flaxman, Seth
Bhatt, Samir
A unified machine learning approach to time series forecasting applied to demand at emergency departments
title A unified machine learning approach to time series forecasting applied to demand at emergency departments
title_full A unified machine learning approach to time series forecasting applied to demand at emergency departments
title_fullStr A unified machine learning approach to time series forecasting applied to demand at emergency departments
title_full_unstemmed A unified machine learning approach to time series forecasting applied to demand at emergency departments
title_short A unified machine learning approach to time series forecasting applied to demand at emergency departments
title_sort unified machine learning approach to time series forecasting applied to demand at emergency departments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7812986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33461485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00395-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vollmermichaelaac aunifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT glampsonben aunifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT mellanthomas aunifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT mishraswapnil aunifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT mercuriluca aunifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT costelloceire aunifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT klaberrobert aunifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT cookegraham aunifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT flaxmanseth aunifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT bhattsamir aunifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT vollmermichaelaac unifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT glampsonben unifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT mellanthomas unifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT mishraswapnil unifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT mercuriluca unifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT costelloceire unifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT klaberrobert unifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT cookegraham unifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT flaxmanseth unifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments
AT bhattsamir unifiedmachinelearningapproachtotimeseriesforecastingappliedtodemandatemergencydepartments