Cargando…
Forest landscape restoration: state of play
Tree planting has been widely touted as an inexpensive way to meet multiple international environmental goals for mitigating climate change, reversing landscape degradation and restoring biodiversity restoration. The Bonn Challenge and New York Declaration on Forests, motivated by widespread defores...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201218 |
_version_ | 1783637815565746176 |
---|---|
author | Stanturf, John A. Mansourian, Stephanie |
author_facet | Stanturf, John A. Mansourian, Stephanie |
author_sort | Stanturf, John A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tree planting has been widely touted as an inexpensive way to meet multiple international environmental goals for mitigating climate change, reversing landscape degradation and restoring biodiversity restoration. The Bonn Challenge and New York Declaration on Forests, motivated by widespread deforestation and forest degradation, call for restoring 350 million ha by 2030 by relying on forest landscape restoration (FLR) processes. Because the 173 million ha commitments made by 63 nations, regions and companies are not legally binding, expectations of what FLR means lacks consensus. The frequent disconnect between top-level aspirations and on-the-ground implementation results in limited data on FLR activities. Additionally, some countries have made landscape-scale restoration outside of the Bonn Challenge. We compared and contrasted the theory and practice of FLR and compiled information from databases of projects and initiatives and case studies. We present the main FLR initiatives happening across regional groups; in many regions, the potential need/opportunity for forest restoration exceeds the FLR activities underway. Multiple objectives can be met by manipulating vegetation (increasing structural complexity, changing species composition and restoring natural disturbances). Livelihood interventions are context-specific but include collecting or raising non-timber forest products, employment and community forests; other interventions address tenure and governance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7813234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78132342021-01-21 Forest landscape restoration: state of play Stanturf, John A. Mansourian, Stephanie R Soc Open Sci Ecology, Conservation, and Global Change Biology Tree planting has been widely touted as an inexpensive way to meet multiple international environmental goals for mitigating climate change, reversing landscape degradation and restoring biodiversity restoration. The Bonn Challenge and New York Declaration on Forests, motivated by widespread deforestation and forest degradation, call for restoring 350 million ha by 2030 by relying on forest landscape restoration (FLR) processes. Because the 173 million ha commitments made by 63 nations, regions and companies are not legally binding, expectations of what FLR means lacks consensus. The frequent disconnect between top-level aspirations and on-the-ground implementation results in limited data on FLR activities. Additionally, some countries have made landscape-scale restoration outside of the Bonn Challenge. We compared and contrasted the theory and practice of FLR and compiled information from databases of projects and initiatives and case studies. We present the main FLR initiatives happening across regional groups; in many regions, the potential need/opportunity for forest restoration exceeds the FLR activities underway. Multiple objectives can be met by manipulating vegetation (increasing structural complexity, changing species composition and restoring natural disturbances). Livelihood interventions are context-specific but include collecting or raising non-timber forest products, employment and community forests; other interventions address tenure and governance. The Royal Society 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7813234/ /pubmed/33489272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201218 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Ecology, Conservation, and Global Change Biology Stanturf, John A. Mansourian, Stephanie Forest landscape restoration: state of play |
title | Forest landscape restoration: state of play |
title_full | Forest landscape restoration: state of play |
title_fullStr | Forest landscape restoration: state of play |
title_full_unstemmed | Forest landscape restoration: state of play |
title_short | Forest landscape restoration: state of play |
title_sort | forest landscape restoration: state of play |
topic | Ecology, Conservation, and Global Change Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stanturfjohna forestlandscaperestorationstateofplay AT mansourianstephanie forestlandscaperestorationstateofplay |