Cargando…

Numerical models for assessing the risk of leaflet thrombosis post-transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation

Leaflet thrombosis has been suggested as the reason for the reduced leaflet motion in cases of hypoattenuated leaflet thickening of bioprosthetic aortic valves. This work aimed to estimate the risk of leaflet thrombosis in two post-valve-in-valve (ViV) configurations, using five different numerical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plitman Mayo, Romina, Yaakobovich, Halit, Finkelstein, Ariel, Shadden, Shawn C., Marom, Gil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201838
_version_ 1783637815811112960
author Plitman Mayo, Romina
Yaakobovich, Halit
Finkelstein, Ariel
Shadden, Shawn C.
Marom, Gil
author_facet Plitman Mayo, Romina
Yaakobovich, Halit
Finkelstein, Ariel
Shadden, Shawn C.
Marom, Gil
author_sort Plitman Mayo, Romina
collection PubMed
description Leaflet thrombosis has been suggested as the reason for the reduced leaflet motion in cases of hypoattenuated leaflet thickening of bioprosthetic aortic valves. This work aimed to estimate the risk of leaflet thrombosis in two post-valve-in-valve (ViV) configurations, using five different numerical approaches. Realistic ViV configurations were calculated by modelling the deployments of the latest version of transcatheter aortic valve devices (Medtronic Evolut PRO, Edwards SAPIEN 3) in the surgical Sorin Mitroflow. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow followed the dry models. Lagrangian and Eulerian measures of near-wall stagnation were implemented by particle and concentration tracking, respectively, to estimate the thrombogenicity and to predict the risk locations. Most of the numerical approaches indicate a higher leaflet thrombosis risk in the Edwards SAPIEN 3 device because of its intra-annular implantation. The Eulerian approaches estimated high-risk locations in agreement with the wall sheer stress (WSS) separation points. On the other hand, the Lagrangian approaches predicted high-risk locations at the proximal regions of the leaflets matching the low WSS magnitude regions of both transcatheter aortic valve implantation models and reported clinical and experimental data. The proposed methods can help optimizing future designs of transcatheter aortic valves with minimal thrombotic risks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7813235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78132352021-01-21 Numerical models for assessing the risk of leaflet thrombosis post-transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation Plitman Mayo, Romina Yaakobovich, Halit Finkelstein, Ariel Shadden, Shawn C. Marom, Gil R Soc Open Sci Engineering Leaflet thrombosis has been suggested as the reason for the reduced leaflet motion in cases of hypoattenuated leaflet thickening of bioprosthetic aortic valves. This work aimed to estimate the risk of leaflet thrombosis in two post-valve-in-valve (ViV) configurations, using five different numerical approaches. Realistic ViV configurations were calculated by modelling the deployments of the latest version of transcatheter aortic valve devices (Medtronic Evolut PRO, Edwards SAPIEN 3) in the surgical Sorin Mitroflow. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow followed the dry models. Lagrangian and Eulerian measures of near-wall stagnation were implemented by particle and concentration tracking, respectively, to estimate the thrombogenicity and to predict the risk locations. Most of the numerical approaches indicate a higher leaflet thrombosis risk in the Edwards SAPIEN 3 device because of its intra-annular implantation. The Eulerian approaches estimated high-risk locations in agreement with the wall sheer stress (WSS) separation points. On the other hand, the Lagrangian approaches predicted high-risk locations at the proximal regions of the leaflets matching the low WSS magnitude regions of both transcatheter aortic valve implantation models and reported clinical and experimental data. The proposed methods can help optimizing future designs of transcatheter aortic valves with minimal thrombotic risks. The Royal Society 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7813235/ /pubmed/33489295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201838 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Engineering
Plitman Mayo, Romina
Yaakobovich, Halit
Finkelstein, Ariel
Shadden, Shawn C.
Marom, Gil
Numerical models for assessing the risk of leaflet thrombosis post-transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation
title Numerical models for assessing the risk of leaflet thrombosis post-transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation
title_full Numerical models for assessing the risk of leaflet thrombosis post-transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation
title_fullStr Numerical models for assessing the risk of leaflet thrombosis post-transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation
title_full_unstemmed Numerical models for assessing the risk of leaflet thrombosis post-transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation
title_short Numerical models for assessing the risk of leaflet thrombosis post-transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation
title_sort numerical models for assessing the risk of leaflet thrombosis post-transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation
topic Engineering
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201838
work_keys_str_mv AT plitmanmayoromina numericalmodelsforassessingtheriskofleafletthrombosisposttranscatheteraorticvalveinvalveimplantation
AT yaakobovichhalit numericalmodelsforassessingtheriskofleafletthrombosisposttranscatheteraorticvalveinvalveimplantation
AT finkelsteinariel numericalmodelsforassessingtheriskofleafletthrombosisposttranscatheteraorticvalveinvalveimplantation
AT shaddenshawnc numericalmodelsforassessingtheriskofleafletthrombosisposttranscatheteraorticvalveinvalveimplantation
AT maromgil numericalmodelsforassessingtheriskofleafletthrombosisposttranscatheteraorticvalveinvalveimplantation