Cargando…

Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences

AIMS: The dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) phenotype is the result of combined genetic and acquired triggers. Until now, clinical decision-making in DCM has mainly been based on ejection fraction (EF) and NYHA classification, not considering the DCM heterogenicity. The present study aimed to identify pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verdonschot, Job A J, Merlo, Marco, Dominguez, Fernando, Wang, Ping, Henkens, Michiel T H M, Adriaens, Michiel E, Hazebroek, Mark R, Masè, Marco, Escobar, Luis E, Cobas-Paz, Rafael, Derks, Kasper W J, van den Wijngaard, Arthur, Krapels, Ingrid P C, Brunner, Han G, Sinagra, Gianfranco, Garcia-Pavia, Pablo, Heymans, Stephane R B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33156912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa841
_version_ 1783637889134886912
author Verdonschot, Job A J
Merlo, Marco
Dominguez, Fernando
Wang, Ping
Henkens, Michiel T H M
Adriaens, Michiel E
Hazebroek, Mark R
Masè, Marco
Escobar, Luis E
Cobas-Paz, Rafael
Derks, Kasper W J
van den Wijngaard, Arthur
Krapels, Ingrid P C
Brunner, Han G
Sinagra, Gianfranco
Garcia-Pavia, Pablo
Heymans, Stephane R B
author_facet Verdonschot, Job A J
Merlo, Marco
Dominguez, Fernando
Wang, Ping
Henkens, Michiel T H M
Adriaens, Michiel E
Hazebroek, Mark R
Masè, Marco
Escobar, Luis E
Cobas-Paz, Rafael
Derks, Kasper W J
van den Wijngaard, Arthur
Krapels, Ingrid P C
Brunner, Han G
Sinagra, Gianfranco
Garcia-Pavia, Pablo
Heymans, Stephane R B
author_sort Verdonschot, Job A J
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) phenotype is the result of combined genetic and acquired triggers. Until now, clinical decision-making in DCM has mainly been based on ejection fraction (EF) and NYHA classification, not considering the DCM heterogenicity. The present study aimed to identify patient subgroups by phenotypic clustering integrating aetiologies, comorbidities, and cardiac function along cardiac transcript levels, to unveil pathophysiological differences between DCM subgroups. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 795 consecutive DCM patients from the Maastricht Cardiomyopathy Registry who underwent in-depth phenotyping, comprising extensive clinical data on aetiology and comorbodities, imaging and endomyocardial biopsies. Four mutually exclusive and clinically distinct phenogroups (PG) were identified based upon unsupervised hierarchical clustering of principal components: [PG1] mild systolic dysfunction, [PG2] auto-immune, [PG3] genetic and arrhythmias, and [PG4] severe systolic dysfunction. RNA-sequencing of cardiac samples (n = 91) revealed a distinct underlying molecular profile per PG: pro-inflammatory (PG2, auto-immune), pro-fibrotic (PG3; arrhythmia), and metabolic (PG4, low EF) gene expression. Furthermore, event-free survival differed among the four phenogroups, also when corrected for well-known clinical predictors. Decision tree modelling identified four clinical parameters (auto-immune disease, EF, atrial fibrillation, and kidney function) by which every DCM patient from two independent DCM cohorts could be placed in one of the four phenogroups with corresponding outcome (n = 789; Spain, n = 352 and Italy, n = 437), showing a feasible applicability of the phenogrouping. CONCLUSION: The present study identified four different DCM phenogroups associated with significant differences in clinical presentation, underlying molecular profiles and outcome, paving the way for a more personalized treatment approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7813623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78136232021-01-25 Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences Verdonschot, Job A J Merlo, Marco Dominguez, Fernando Wang, Ping Henkens, Michiel T H M Adriaens, Michiel E Hazebroek, Mark R Masè, Marco Escobar, Luis E Cobas-Paz, Rafael Derks, Kasper W J van den Wijngaard, Arthur Krapels, Ingrid P C Brunner, Han G Sinagra, Gianfranco Garcia-Pavia, Pablo Heymans, Stephane R B Eur Heart J Clinical Research AIMS: The dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) phenotype is the result of combined genetic and acquired triggers. Until now, clinical decision-making in DCM has mainly been based on ejection fraction (EF) and NYHA classification, not considering the DCM heterogenicity. The present study aimed to identify patient subgroups by phenotypic clustering integrating aetiologies, comorbidities, and cardiac function along cardiac transcript levels, to unveil pathophysiological differences between DCM subgroups. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 795 consecutive DCM patients from the Maastricht Cardiomyopathy Registry who underwent in-depth phenotyping, comprising extensive clinical data on aetiology and comorbodities, imaging and endomyocardial biopsies. Four mutually exclusive and clinically distinct phenogroups (PG) were identified based upon unsupervised hierarchical clustering of principal components: [PG1] mild systolic dysfunction, [PG2] auto-immune, [PG3] genetic and arrhythmias, and [PG4] severe systolic dysfunction. RNA-sequencing of cardiac samples (n = 91) revealed a distinct underlying molecular profile per PG: pro-inflammatory (PG2, auto-immune), pro-fibrotic (PG3; arrhythmia), and metabolic (PG4, low EF) gene expression. Furthermore, event-free survival differed among the four phenogroups, also when corrected for well-known clinical predictors. Decision tree modelling identified four clinical parameters (auto-immune disease, EF, atrial fibrillation, and kidney function) by which every DCM patient from two independent DCM cohorts could be placed in one of the four phenogroups with corresponding outcome (n = 789; Spain, n = 352 and Italy, n = 437), showing a feasible applicability of the phenogrouping. CONCLUSION: The present study identified four different DCM phenogroups associated with significant differences in clinical presentation, underlying molecular profiles and outcome, paving the way for a more personalized treatment approach. Oxford University Press 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7813623/ /pubmed/33156912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa841 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Verdonschot, Job A J
Merlo, Marco
Dominguez, Fernando
Wang, Ping
Henkens, Michiel T H M
Adriaens, Michiel E
Hazebroek, Mark R
Masè, Marco
Escobar, Luis E
Cobas-Paz, Rafael
Derks, Kasper W J
van den Wijngaard, Arthur
Krapels, Ingrid P C
Brunner, Han G
Sinagra, Gianfranco
Garcia-Pavia, Pablo
Heymans, Stephane R B
Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences
title Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences
title_full Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences
title_fullStr Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences
title_full_unstemmed Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences
title_short Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences
title_sort phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33156912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa841
work_keys_str_mv AT verdonschotjobaj phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT merlomarco phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT dominguezfernando phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT wangping phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT henkensmichielthm phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT adriaensmichiele phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT hazebroekmarkr phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT masemarco phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT escobarluise phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT cobaspazrafael phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT derkskasperwj phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT vandenwijngaardarthur phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT krapelsingridpc phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT brunnerhang phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT sinagragianfranco phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT garciapaviapablo phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences
AT heymansstephanerb phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences