Cargando…
Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences
AIMS: The dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) phenotype is the result of combined genetic and acquired triggers. Until now, clinical decision-making in DCM has mainly been based on ejection fraction (EF) and NYHA classification, not considering the DCM heterogenicity. The present study aimed to identify pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33156912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa841 |
_version_ | 1783637889134886912 |
---|---|
author | Verdonschot, Job A J Merlo, Marco Dominguez, Fernando Wang, Ping Henkens, Michiel T H M Adriaens, Michiel E Hazebroek, Mark R Masè, Marco Escobar, Luis E Cobas-Paz, Rafael Derks, Kasper W J van den Wijngaard, Arthur Krapels, Ingrid P C Brunner, Han G Sinagra, Gianfranco Garcia-Pavia, Pablo Heymans, Stephane R B |
author_facet | Verdonschot, Job A J Merlo, Marco Dominguez, Fernando Wang, Ping Henkens, Michiel T H M Adriaens, Michiel E Hazebroek, Mark R Masè, Marco Escobar, Luis E Cobas-Paz, Rafael Derks, Kasper W J van den Wijngaard, Arthur Krapels, Ingrid P C Brunner, Han G Sinagra, Gianfranco Garcia-Pavia, Pablo Heymans, Stephane R B |
author_sort | Verdonschot, Job A J |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) phenotype is the result of combined genetic and acquired triggers. Until now, clinical decision-making in DCM has mainly been based on ejection fraction (EF) and NYHA classification, not considering the DCM heterogenicity. The present study aimed to identify patient subgroups by phenotypic clustering integrating aetiologies, comorbidities, and cardiac function along cardiac transcript levels, to unveil pathophysiological differences between DCM subgroups. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 795 consecutive DCM patients from the Maastricht Cardiomyopathy Registry who underwent in-depth phenotyping, comprising extensive clinical data on aetiology and comorbodities, imaging and endomyocardial biopsies. Four mutually exclusive and clinically distinct phenogroups (PG) were identified based upon unsupervised hierarchical clustering of principal components: [PG1] mild systolic dysfunction, [PG2] auto-immune, [PG3] genetic and arrhythmias, and [PG4] severe systolic dysfunction. RNA-sequencing of cardiac samples (n = 91) revealed a distinct underlying molecular profile per PG: pro-inflammatory (PG2, auto-immune), pro-fibrotic (PG3; arrhythmia), and metabolic (PG4, low EF) gene expression. Furthermore, event-free survival differed among the four phenogroups, also when corrected for well-known clinical predictors. Decision tree modelling identified four clinical parameters (auto-immune disease, EF, atrial fibrillation, and kidney function) by which every DCM patient from two independent DCM cohorts could be placed in one of the four phenogroups with corresponding outcome (n = 789; Spain, n = 352 and Italy, n = 437), showing a feasible applicability of the phenogrouping. CONCLUSION: The present study identified four different DCM phenogroups associated with significant differences in clinical presentation, underlying molecular profiles and outcome, paving the way for a more personalized treatment approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7813623 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78136232021-01-25 Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences Verdonschot, Job A J Merlo, Marco Dominguez, Fernando Wang, Ping Henkens, Michiel T H M Adriaens, Michiel E Hazebroek, Mark R Masè, Marco Escobar, Luis E Cobas-Paz, Rafael Derks, Kasper W J van den Wijngaard, Arthur Krapels, Ingrid P C Brunner, Han G Sinagra, Gianfranco Garcia-Pavia, Pablo Heymans, Stephane R B Eur Heart J Clinical Research AIMS: The dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) phenotype is the result of combined genetic and acquired triggers. Until now, clinical decision-making in DCM has mainly been based on ejection fraction (EF) and NYHA classification, not considering the DCM heterogenicity. The present study aimed to identify patient subgroups by phenotypic clustering integrating aetiologies, comorbidities, and cardiac function along cardiac transcript levels, to unveil pathophysiological differences between DCM subgroups. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 795 consecutive DCM patients from the Maastricht Cardiomyopathy Registry who underwent in-depth phenotyping, comprising extensive clinical data on aetiology and comorbodities, imaging and endomyocardial biopsies. Four mutually exclusive and clinically distinct phenogroups (PG) were identified based upon unsupervised hierarchical clustering of principal components: [PG1] mild systolic dysfunction, [PG2] auto-immune, [PG3] genetic and arrhythmias, and [PG4] severe systolic dysfunction. RNA-sequencing of cardiac samples (n = 91) revealed a distinct underlying molecular profile per PG: pro-inflammatory (PG2, auto-immune), pro-fibrotic (PG3; arrhythmia), and metabolic (PG4, low EF) gene expression. Furthermore, event-free survival differed among the four phenogroups, also when corrected for well-known clinical predictors. Decision tree modelling identified four clinical parameters (auto-immune disease, EF, atrial fibrillation, and kidney function) by which every DCM patient from two independent DCM cohorts could be placed in one of the four phenogroups with corresponding outcome (n = 789; Spain, n = 352 and Italy, n = 437), showing a feasible applicability of the phenogrouping. CONCLUSION: The present study identified four different DCM phenogroups associated with significant differences in clinical presentation, underlying molecular profiles and outcome, paving the way for a more personalized treatment approach. Oxford University Press 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7813623/ /pubmed/33156912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa841 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Verdonschot, Job A J Merlo, Marco Dominguez, Fernando Wang, Ping Henkens, Michiel T H M Adriaens, Michiel E Hazebroek, Mark R Masè, Marco Escobar, Luis E Cobas-Paz, Rafael Derks, Kasper W J van den Wijngaard, Arthur Krapels, Ingrid P C Brunner, Han G Sinagra, Gianfranco Garcia-Pavia, Pablo Heymans, Stephane R B Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences |
title | Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences |
title_full | Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences |
title_fullStr | Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences |
title_full_unstemmed | Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences |
title_short | Phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences |
title_sort | phenotypic clustering of dilated cardiomyopathy patients highlights important pathophysiological differences |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33156912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa841 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verdonschotjobaj phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT merlomarco phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT dominguezfernando phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT wangping phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT henkensmichielthm phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT adriaensmichiele phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT hazebroekmarkr phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT masemarco phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT escobarluise phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT cobaspazrafael phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT derkskasperwj phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT vandenwijngaardarthur phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT krapelsingridpc phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT brunnerhang phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT sinagragianfranco phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT garciapaviapablo phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences AT heymansstephanerb phenotypicclusteringofdilatedcardiomyopathypatientshighlightsimportantpathophysiologicaldifferences |